Religion and Ethics 2.0

[RWS]

The people have to suffer. They never prosper.

Religion is for the rulers. Not the followers.

 

[RWS]

In order for a religion to happen and evolve, it has to make a profit. Otherwise it's dead in the water.

In order to make a profit, you need to make sure they donate in one way or another.

 

[RWS]

Religion is a business proposition. A business agreement you enter to based on birth.

It's a scam.

 

[RWS]

Because your birth religion is based on the fact that they killed your ancestors that had different beliefs.

 

[RWS]

There is no true Christian on this forum. Or any other religion. You got converted at some point by force.

 

[Taz]

All Muslims want to live under Sharia Law. World domination by the Koran is the ultimate goal. Don't be fooled.

Dear Taz the only thing that can dominate the world is love that everyone wants
and freedom from fear and stress that nobody wants.

As for Muslims, "shariah" refers to all practices including prayer and charity.
"Shariah Law" means the POLITICAL RELIGION that not all Muslims follow.

Are you leaving out Muslim Constitutional lawyers, scholars and veterans who
put duty to country and the Constitution before personal beliefs that remain private?

Are you saying they are no longer Muslims if they put the Constitution first?

That's exactly what I'm saying. If they don't put Sharia first, they aren't real Muslims, or more likely, they are just lying. They all want to live under Sharia. bar none.

That’s odd because the Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Drop the mic.

emi, it's just his say so. Dingbat will never give you a proper link. Ever.

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

 

[Taz]

That's exactly what I'm saying. If they don't put Sharia first, they aren't real Muslims, or more likely, they are just lying. They all want to live under Sharia. bar none.

so Taz what do you call Muslims
who follow civil and Constitutional laws like other citizens.

You don't call them Muslim what do you call them?

Are they Christians who just speak the Muslim language
and practice that culture but they are really Christian?

So it's just another "denomination" of Christianity
to follow the Bible and Bill of Rights like other citizens do?

^ Taz if that's too long
how about this proposal:
1. using JIHADISTS to mean the TERRORISTS committing violent attacks outside their regimes
2. using ISLAMISTS to mean the OPPRESSIVE political religion within their nations
3. using MUSLIMS to mean the peaceful CIVIL people who are neither 2 or 1

All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia. All of them.

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

 

[ding]

Dear Taz the only thing that can dominate the world is love that everyone wants
and freedom from fear and stress that nobody wants.

As for Muslims, "shariah" refers to all practices including prayer and charity.
"Shariah Law" means the POLITICAL RELIGION that not all Muslims follow.

Are you leaving out Muslim Constitutional lawyers, scholars and veterans who
put duty to country and the Constitution before personal beliefs that remain private?

Are you saying they are no longer Muslims if they put the Constitution first?

That's exactly what I'm saying. If they don't put Sharia first, they aren't real Muslims, or more likely, they are just lying. They all want to live under Sharia. bar none.

That’s odd because the Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Drop the mic.

emi, it's just his say so. Dingbat will never give you a proper link. Ever.

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

 

[ding]

That's exactly what I'm saying. If they don't put Sharia first, they aren't real Muslims, or more likely, they are just lying. They all want to live under Sharia. bar none.

so Taz what do you call Muslims
who follow civil and Constitutional laws like other citizens.

You don't call them Muslim what do you call them?

Are they Christians who just speak the Muslim language
and practice that culture but they are really Christian?

So it's just another "denomination" of Christianity
to follow the Bible and Bill of Rights like other citizens do?

^ Taz if that's too long
how about this proposal:
1. using JIHADISTS to mean the TERRORISTS committing violent attacks outside their regimes
2. using ISLAMISTS to mean the OPPRESSIVE political religion within their nations
3. using MUSLIMS to mean the peaceful CIVIL people who are neither 2 or 1

All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia. All of them.

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

 

[Taz]

That's exactly what I'm saying. If they don't put Sharia first, they aren't real Muslims, or more likely, they are just lying. They all want to live under Sharia. bar none.

That’s odd because the Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Drop the mic.

emi, it's just his say so. Dingbat will never give you a proper link. Ever.

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

Nothing to disprove except your say so. Better luck next time.

 

[Taz]

so Taz what do you call Muslims
who follow civil and Constitutional laws like other citizens.

You don't call them Muslim what do you call them?

Are they Christians who just speak the Muslim language
and practice that culture but they are really Christian?

So it's just another "denomination" of Christianity
to follow the Bible and Bill of Rights like other citizens do?

^ Taz if that's too long
how about this proposal:
1. using JIHADISTS to mean the TERRORISTS committing violent attacks outside their regimes
2. using ISLAMISTS to mean the OPPRESSIVE political religion within their nations
3. using MUSLIMS to mean the peaceful CIVIL people who are neither 2 or 1

All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia. All of them.

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

 

[ding]

That’s odd because the Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Drop the mic.

emi, it's just his say so. Dingbat will never give you a proper link. Ever.

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

Nothing to disprove except your say so. Better luck next time.

So you never made the claim that All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia?

I named 22 predominantly Muslim nations that don’t. Prove any of them do.

 

[ding]

^ Taz if that's too long
how about this proposal:
1. using JIHADISTS to mean the TERRORISTS committing violent attacks outside their regimes
2. using ISLAMISTS to mean the OPPRESSIVE political religion within their nations
3. using MUSLIMS to mean the peaceful CIVIL people who are neither 2 or 1

All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia. All of them.

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

So you believe the leaders just went against the wishes of every single Muslim in the nation?

 

[Taz]

All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia. All of them.

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

So you believe the leaders just went against the wishes of every single Muslim in the nation?

Why should they care, like in Turkey, they don’t care about mooselimbs.

 

[Taz]

emi, it's just his say so. Dingbat will never give you a proper link. Ever.

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

Nothing to disprove except your say so. Better luck next time.

So you never made the claim that All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia?

I named 22 predominantly Muslim nations that don’t. Prove any of them do.

The mooselimbs in those countries support jihad and sharia.

 

[ding]

Didn’t I already deal with this?

The Muslim predominant nations of Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Chad, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Tunisia, Togo, and Uzbekistan, declared the law under their Constitutions to be “completely secular” in nature, and Sharia has no role in the legal process.

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

So you believe the leaders just went against the wishes of every single Muslim in the nation?

Why should they care, like in Turkey, they don’t care about mooselimbs.

Because they want to remain in power. Because they don’t want to drug through the streets by mobs.

Face it. There are 22 Muslim nations where Sharia is not allowed in their laws which are totally secular in origin.

 

[ding]

What do you need a link for now?

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

Nothing to disprove except your say so. Better luck next time.

So you never made the claim that All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia?

I named 22 predominantly Muslim nations that don’t. Prove any of them do.

The mooselimbs in those countries support jihad and sharia.

You know this how?

 

[Taz]

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

So you believe the leaders just went against the wishes of every single Muslim in the nation?

Why should they care, like in Turkey, they don’t care about mooselimbs.

Because they want to remain in power. Because they don’t want to drug through the streets by mobs.

Face it. There are 22 Muslim nations where Sharia is not allowed in their laws which are totally secular in origin.

I’m talking about people. Your strawman just went up in flames.

 

[Taz]

To back up what you just said.

You mean you can’t disprove it?

Nothing to disprove except your say so. Better luck next time.

So you never made the claim that All Muslims support Jihad and Sharia?

I named 22 predominantly Muslim nations that don’t. Prove any of them do.

The mooselimbs in those countries support jihad and sharia.

You know this how?

Otherwise they aren’t real mooselimbs.

 

[ding]

Don’t you have a link proving your stereotype?

Anyways, just because a country doesn’t adopt sharia doesn’t mean that all the Muslim in it still don’t want to live under it.

So you believe the leaders just went against the wishes of every single Muslim in the nation?

Why should they care, like in Turkey, they don’t care about mooselimbs.

Because they want to remain in power. Because they don’t want to drug through the streets by mobs.

Face it. There are 22 Muslim nations where Sharia is not allowed in their laws which are totally secular in origin.

I’m talking about people. Your strawman just went up in flames.

Nations are comprised of people.