emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Again, you are either an apologist, or a believer, if you follow a religion.
You either apologize for the evil that got you there, or deny it.
It's very simple...
Either one is not the way to be. Both ways are evil.
Excuse me RWS but let's compare it to families that suffered incest or fraud where someone did something wrong to the other family members.
Are you saying it is "evil" to forgive that person?
What if that is part of the healing and correction process?
I know a family that had to forgive incestuous abuse and also adultery
in order to save their relationships. They don't DENYthe wrongs were wrong.
That's not what FORGIVENESS is about.
The family member who had to go through counseling to recover from the partner's infidelity was also SHOCKED and ANGERED/COMPLETELY INSULTED to learnt that forgiveness is one of the steps! "why should ***I*** have to forgive the other person when THEY did the wrong and I had no knowledge or say in it. I didn't ask for this, they did. Now it's on ***ME*** to change my thinking?"of course the initial reaction is it's the OTHER PERSON needs to change, THEY did the wrong not me!!! but when it comes to HEALING of the wrong, the victim of the wrong still needs to forgive and let go that emotional burden, or else they will carry the injury and burden "that belongs to the wrongdoer." the first step is to let go and not hold on to the responsibility that belongs to the wrongdoer, not to the victim to feel that injury and upset.
Forgiveness ALLOWS the mind and conscience to release the EMOTIONAL pains, distress and attachments associated with the injuries.
It does NOT change the fact that wrongs were wrong, or crimes were illegal and still face consequences! A person can forgive the murderer in prison, but that person may still face legal consequences and execution; and that has nothing to do with spiritual healing and forgiveness releasing the victims and survivors of any ill will, fear or negative feelings about the murder and the aftermath including the execution. They have let go, and are at peace, while the justice system is still used to govern the process by laws.
I think you are confusing forgiveness with "enabling".
If you are DENYING the wrongdoing that is ALSO NOT FORGIVENESS.
Forgiveness means ACKNOWLEDGING the wrongs or injuries,
or else what is there to FORGIVE if no wrong or harm was committed?
RWS I AGREE with you that just like the Black Democrats have done for years,
"denying tolerating enabling" and "turning a blind eye" to wrongs is WRONG.
It allows abuse to continue so that is the WRONG way to do things.
The right way is to forgive in order to communicate and understand the causes so these can be
ADDRESSED and CORRECTED mutually and transparently between the parties involved.
If people are still yelling and screaming, then the causes and solutions cannot be addressed rationally.
You seem very levelheaded and rational about this, RWS.
If you were so hostile and belligerent about religious abuses, that you could not contain your
outrage, so you were ranting and blaming and threatening people with punishment,
then nobody could work or reason with you to IDENTIFY which people caused which abuses.
So you would need to forgive the upset FIRST before you could rationally address the wrongs underneath.
That's what is meant by forgiveness.
IT DOES NOT CHANGE the nature of the wrongs and the need for justice for wrongdoings.'
It does NOT excuse the wrongdoer from having to take responsibility for the debts and damages incurred.
(in fact it does the opposite and allows them to be addressed MORE EFFECTIVELY so they CAN BE COMPELLED by conscience to take actions.)
It releases that emotional angst and victimhood obstructing people, and
brings them PEACE at ALL stages throughout the process. So you DON'T have
to wait until the problem is resolved to find PEACE, you can have it before and during the pursuit of justice.
(NOTE 1:
this is the most common misperception of forgiveness in thinking it lets the wrongdoers off the ho o k and enables
wrongs to continue like a doormat asking to be abused.
see explanations on the Dangers of Unforgiveness:
"Unforgiveness is like drinking poison and waiting for the other person to die"
Dangers of Unforgiveness
and the Steps to Forgiveness: Steps to Forgiveness)
NOTE 2: a common misperception of "turning the other cheek" in the Bible is to act like a doormat and invite abuse to continue.
No, of course that isn't what it means or you're right that is abusive and wrong. That is enabling injustice instead of invoking the authority of Justice which Jesus represents,
but Justice with Mercy, not with retribution which belongs to God alone.
The best explanation I ever saw for "turning the other cheek" in the Bible
was to compel the accuser to address the accused with respect as an equal peer in order to deliver a rebuke.
A backhanded slap was reserved for SLAVES who were not citizens but less than equal people.
So backhanding a slave was reprimanding someone lower than the other person as the Master.
A forehanded slap was reserved for Citizens, so forcing someone to rebuke you as an equal
citizen is demanding correction as a Colleague not as someone inferior.)
Last edited: