Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well it is called the law. You see in order to strip me of my rights you need to take me before a Judge and prove I am incompetent or a danger. Good luck with that my shrink and my therapist will tell you I am neither.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Why would a self described paranoid be allowed to own firearms in the first place, that is the question
No ones coming for your firearms. Did you hear about the gun raids they did all over Detroit this week? How are there so many guns flooding the market? You want a gun or ten guns? Cool. But all your guns are legally registered to you. Where do all the guns come from? Corporations who want to max their profits just like healthcare and oil companies. Or any other corporation for that matter.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Total straw man, whole point of the 2nd is to give citizens equal power of the government, excuse me more power than the government. For those arguing that the militia means army and police not citizens, the founding fathers were more worried about a standing army being able to carry out ceaser like coup. A government won't be able to oppress armed citizens. For those arguing for assault rifle bans, I would ask what was the difference between civilian gun and a military gun when the 2nd was written? None, like I said before they wanted citizens to have equal power. The 2nd protects the rest of the ammendmets7 years since his election- 7 years of predictions that Obama will be seizing your guns.
7 years of gullible and paranoid gun enthusiasts making gun manufacturers wealthy
And 7 years without guns being seized.
We just need to better regulate the gun industry and audit the process and fix it so millions of illegal guns end up on the black market. But the gun lobby and corporations won't like it. But who's the boss here our government or the corporations? Unfortunately the corporations own our government, and this is just one of many examples that is true.Well it is called the law. You see in order to strip me of my rights you need to take me before a Judge and prove I am incompetent or a danger. Good luck with that my shrink and my therapist will tell you I am neither.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Why would a self described paranoid be allowed to own firearms in the first place, that is the question
Just the name of your post is paranoid,
And just how do people know you have guns and what type you have?
We have been hearing this paranoia for over 6 1/2 years and that is what fuels the gun fedisists to keep buying more guns and scouring the horizon for the President to take them away. all brought to you buy the gun lobby :the NRA
People do own full auto 50 cal m2 and m3m, as well as mini guns, they are all obviously responsible people. It's not rational to use c4 for a crime when a much cheaper concealed handgun can do the trick. Unless you're a terrorist, but you don't have to spend crazy money on c4 just to make a bomb.Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals. Is that really so invasive?You do know that the first amendment has limitations right? Child pornography and defamation are both illegal. Shouldn't the 2nd as well?
You do know that child pornography and defamation harm other people, right? Me owning a gun does not harm other people. Me going on a killing spree with it obviously does, but last I checked that was already illegal.
Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals.
Nothing keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, if they want them.
Why are their laws against owning fully auto .50 caliber machine guns then? And why don't criminals have them? What about explosives? Why have laws against them, criminals will get what they want right? Why are there so few criminals caught using C4 or dynamite?
The gun hugger arguments are ridiculous. "Why have laws, they don't protect anyone"? Well then why do we have any laws at all.
Gun lickers have an irrational fear of life and a gun seems to be the only pacifier that feels comfortable in their mouth.
If only law abiding citizens could get their hands on guns criminals wouldn't find it so easy getting their hands on guns.People do own full auto 50 cal m2 and m3m, as well as mini guns, they are all obviously responsible people. It's not rational to use c4 for a crime when a much cheaper concealed handgun can do the trick. Unless you're a terrorist, but you don't have to spend crazy money on c4 just to make a bomb.Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals. Is that really so invasive?You do know that the first amendment has limitations right? Child pornography and defamation are both illegal. Shouldn't the 2nd as well?
You do know that child pornography and defamation harm other people, right? Me owning a gun does not harm other people. Me going on a killing spree with it obviously does, but last I checked that was already illegal.
Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals.
Nothing keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, if they want them.
Why are their laws against owning fully auto .50 caliber machine guns then? And why don't criminals have them? What about explosives? Why have laws against them, criminals will get what they want right? Why are there so few criminals caught using C4 or dynamite?
The gun hugger arguments are ridiculous. "Why have laws, they don't protect anyone"? Well then why do we have any laws at all.
Gun lickers have an irrational fear of life and a gun seems to be the only pacifier that feels comfortable in their mouth.
"Why have laws they don't protect anyone," is a straw man argument that no one is talking about. The laws are disarming people making them soft easy targets for criminals who are not going to follow the gun laws. That's why the crazies go after the unarmed people following the laws, look at Chattanooga, aurora, v tech, fort hood, sandy hook, Charlie hebdo, etc. All gun free zones. You want to drop the rape rate, arm women. You want to stop purse theft, arm women. Guns are an equalizer, and gun laws only give a monopoly of force to the government and criminals. Now try to argue against that
People do own full auto 50 cal m2 and m3m, as well as mini guns, they are all obviously responsible people. It's not rational to use c4 for a crime when a much cheaper concealed handgun can do the trick. Unless you're a terrorist, but you don't have to spend crazy money on c4 just to make a bomb.Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals. Is that really so invasive?You do know that the first amendment has limitations right? Child pornography and defamation are both illegal. Shouldn't the 2nd as well?
You do know that child pornography and defamation harm other people, right? Me owning a gun does not harm other people. Me going on a killing spree with it obviously does, but last I checked that was already illegal.
Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals.
Nothing keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, if they want them.
Why are their laws against owning fully auto .50 caliber machine guns then? And why don't criminals have them? What about explosives? Why have laws against them, criminals will get what they want right? Why are there so few criminals caught using C4 or dynamite?
The gun hugger arguments are ridiculous. "Why have laws, they don't protect anyone"? Well then why do we have any laws at all.
Gun lickers have an irrational fear of life and a gun seems to be the only pacifier that feels comfortable in their mouth.
"Why have laws they don't protect anyone," is a straw man argument that no one is talking about. The laws are disarming people making them soft easy targets for criminals who are not going to follow the gun laws. That's why the crazies go after the unarmed people following the laws, look at Chattanooga, aurora, v tech, fort hood, sandy hook, Charlie hebdo, etc. All gun free zones. You want to drop the rape rate, arm women. You want to stop purse theft, arm women. Guns are an equalizer, and gun laws only give a monopoly of force to the government and criminals. Now try to argue against that
I sell accessories in manufacturing. Every part comes with a serial number. Every little tip. Why not guns and bullets too? Every part on the gun has a little serial number. I don't blame the gun corporations for wanting the status quo. They only care about profits. That's what corporations do.
No not in any way, gun bans did not stop Charlie hebdo, or any other shooting in any other country with gun bans. Nor does it lower their crime rates, look it up. And even if the crazies can't get their hands on guns, they'll use one of the many other tools humans can use to kill people. In china right around sandy hook shooting, somebody hacked 20 school children to death with a machete. Now I'll point back to a country with ridiculously low crime rates that issue their citizens assault rifles, Switzerland. Good people with guns keep us safe, the more of them there are, the safer we are.If only law abiding citizens could get their hands on guns criminals wouldn't find it so easy getting their hands on guns.People do own full auto 50 cal m2 and m3m, as well as mini guns, they are all obviously responsible people. It's not rational to use c4 for a crime when a much cheaper concealed handgun can do the trick. Unless you're a terrorist, but you don't have to spend crazy money on c4 just to make a bomb.Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals. Is that really so invasive?You do know that child pornography and defamation harm other people, right? Me owning a gun does not harm other people. Me going on a killing spree with it obviously does, but last I checked that was already illegal.
Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals.
Nothing keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, if they want them.
Why are their laws against owning fully auto .50 caliber machine guns then? And why don't criminals have them? What about explosives? Why have laws against them, criminals will get what they want right? Why are there so few criminals caught using C4 or dynamite?
The gun hugger arguments are ridiculous. "Why have laws, they don't protect anyone"? Well then why do we have any laws at all.
Gun lickers have an irrational fear of life and a gun seems to be the only pacifier that feels comfortable in their mouth.
"Why have laws they don't protect anyone," is a straw man argument that no one is talking about. The laws are disarming people making them soft easy targets for criminals who are not going to follow the gun laws. That's why the crazies go after the unarmed people following the laws, look at Chattanooga, aurora, v tech, fort hood, sandy hook, Charlie hebdo, etc. All gun free zones. You want to drop the rape rate, arm women. You want to stop purse theft, arm women. Guns are an equalizer, and gun laws only give a monopoly of force to the government and criminals. Now try to argue against that
Are you suggesting all the illegal guns on the black market were stolen from law abiding gun owners?
Wouldn't that prove gun ownership doesn't stop burglars? Lol
Hey....if you've ever been depressed.....or bounced a check forget about gun ownership.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Why would a self described paranoid be allowed to own firearms in the first place, that is the question
Ignorant right wingers. Does stupid take practice? They know Obama expanded gun rights more than any other president in nearly a hundred years and yet they are determined to stay as ignorant as possible. Ignorance heightens the thrill they get from fear.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Why would a self described paranoid be allowed to own firearms in the first place, that is the question
Just checked. Still got all of mine.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?
They have no problem with crazies and terrorists...if they have guns.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?
That's because we fight him.
-Geaux
A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.
The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.
Ignorant right wingers. Does stupid take practice? They know Obama expanded gun rights more than any other president in nearly a hundred years and yet they are determined to stay as ignorant as possible. Ignorance heightens the thrill they get from fear.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
Obama only wants to keep guns out of the hands of crazies. But this Republican party has gone so crazy, they don't recognize the dangerous crazies as being different from them.
he is planning to leave stupidI didn't say he WOULDN'T leave, I said "he's not planning to leave". PS, you don't know enough to capitalize the first word of a sentence and you call me a moron?you are a moron. He is leavingHe won't give up, and he's not planning on leaving office.
Just checked. Still got all of mine.Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News
He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.
How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?
Switzerland doesn't have high crime ghettos or poor masses. Don't compare America and Switzerland such a small rich nation. Please.No not in any way, gun bans did not stop Charlie hebdo, or any other shooting in any other country with gun bans. Nor does it lower their crime rates, look it up. And even if the crazies can't get their hands on guns, they'll use one of the many other tools humans can use to kill people. In china right around sandy hook shooting, somebody hacked 20 school children to death with a machete. Now I'll point back to a country with ridiculously low crime rates that issue their citizens assault rifles, Switzerland. Good people with guns keep us safe, the more of them there are, the safer we are.If only law abiding citizens could get their hands on guns criminals wouldn't find it so easy getting their hands on guns.People do own full auto 50 cal m2 and m3m, as well as mini guns, they are all obviously responsible people. It's not rational to use c4 for a crime when a much cheaper concealed handgun can do the trick. Unless you're a terrorist, but you don't have to spend crazy money on c4 just to make a bomb.Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals. Is that really so invasive?
Um yeah and strict background helps keep guns out of dangerous criminals.
Nothing keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, if they want them.
Why are their laws against owning fully auto .50 caliber machine guns then? And why don't criminals have them? What about explosives? Why have laws against them, criminals will get what they want right? Why are there so few criminals caught using C4 or dynamite?
The gun hugger arguments are ridiculous. "Why have laws, they don't protect anyone"? Well then why do we have any laws at all.
Gun lickers have an irrational fear of life and a gun seems to be the only pacifier that feels comfortable in their mouth.
"Why have laws they don't protect anyone," is a straw man argument that no one is talking about. The laws are disarming people making them soft easy targets for criminals who are not going to follow the gun laws. That's why the crazies go after the unarmed people following the laws, look at Chattanooga, aurora, v tech, fort hood, sandy hook, Charlie hebdo, etc. All gun free zones. You want to drop the rape rate, arm women. You want to stop purse theft, arm women. Guns are an equalizer, and gun laws only give a monopoly of force to the government and criminals. Now try to argue against that
Are you suggesting all the illegal guns on the black market were stolen from law abiding gun owners?
Wouldn't that prove gun ownership doesn't stop burglars? Lol
