Remind Us how Obama does not want our firearms.

Folks, you have to understand the liberal "mind" in order to understand why they claim the stupid things they do. For instance, on guns, they can't think past this moment right now. You see, if obama isn't knocking on our door right now, that means he isn't going to. They can't think about next year or hell even next month or tomorrow for that matter. We know that disarming Americans is the goal of the left, they can't think past this very minute. They just aren't very smart.

Said a paranoid schizophrenic.

Thanks for volunteering yourself as an example of the stupidity I was talking about.

Oh yes, I'm sure Hinkley and Lanza also had bizarre views of reality and they thought it was everyone else that was loony.

Be sure to lick your gun before bed, it is feeling unloved.

Rather odd how relatives of all these massacre victims hug their families but you bungs hug your guns. Well, odd to the normals.

Lol. Whatever you have to tell yourself loser.
 
Yeah. I'm a person who needs evidence of stuff in order to be able to believe something.

how about this,
Hussein Obama told the BBC he has felt “distressed” and “stymied” over his inability to get gun-control passed through Congress, and he will double down on these efforts in his remaining months in office.

Read more at Bang Obama cocks hammer on new gun control

do you believe in this evidence ?
 
7 years since his election- 7 years of predictions that Obama will be seizing your guns.

7 years of gullible and paranoid gun enthusiasts making gun manufacturers wealthy

And 7 years without guns being seized.
Total straw man, whole point of the 2nd is to give citizens equal power of the government, excuse me more power than the government. For those arguing that the militia means army and police not citizens, the founding fathers were more worried about a standing army being able to carry out ceaser like coup. A government won't be able to oppress armed citizens. For those arguing for assault rifle bans, I would ask what was the difference between civilian gun and a military gun when the 2nd was written? None, like I said before they wanted citizens to have equal power. The 2nd protects the rest of the ammendmets
 
Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News

He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.

How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?


so what

obama says he is frustrated that he has not done so
This is a lie.

The president has never said he wants to 'confiscate guns.'

That you and many others on the right seek to contrive and propagate such lies comes as no surprise.
 
Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News

He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.

How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?

That's because we fight him.

-Geaux
Senatevote.jpg

A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".

Can you prosecute someone who makes a private sale to a felon if the private sale did not require a background check?

If you can show the person making the sale had knowledge that the buyer was ineligible, yes.
The seller is not exempt from due diligence.
 
Lack of US gun control Obama s greatest frustration - Yahoo News

He wants and expects new regulations on firearms specifically protected by the 2nd. Remind us again how Obama is not out to take firearms away again.

How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?

That's because we fight him.

-Geaux
Senatevote.jpg

A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".
That's not the issue – Federal law does not require a background check with regard to private face to face gun sales between residents of the same that take place in that state. A convicted felon can obtain a firearm in such a private sale with the intent of committing a crime where the seller has no idea he's selling a gun to a felon.

A prohibited person may not be able to 'legally' obtain a firearm, but there's nothing in the law preventing him from in fact doing so when buying from a private seller.

There's nothing in the law preventing me from robbing you either, doesn't make it legal. You prosecute people who actually do the crime, right?
 
How many of your guns has Obama confiscated so far?

That's because we fight him.

-Geaux
Senatevote.jpg

A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".

Can you prosecute someone who makes a private sale to a felon if the private sale did not require a background check?

If you can show the person making the sale had knowledge that the buyer was ineligible, yes.
The seller is not exempt from due diligence.

Why not just require the background check?
 
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

So where can I get Child Porn?

I can't legally.

Does that mean Child Porn doesn't exist? No, but it is illegal.

So right to a gun has to have limitations too.

Now to have loopholes in background checks is the same as having no background checks.

So do the gun guys here want no background checks and if so how do you propose keeping guns out of undesirables hands.

There are people who have had their right to own firearms taken from them, if they're found with one you prosecute them, just like any other crime. No law is effective in preempting crime, if they were there would be no crime, you just deal with them when they occur.

Is it illegal to sell a minor a beer?

You are saying that there is no point because convicted felon will get a gun anyway. How, if it is illegal to sell it to him?

This is about cutting the supply to people who shouldn't have a gun.

Are you really that dense, criminals do give a flying flip about any law you put on the books. The CDC has said no gun law has had any major impact on crime, including background checks, because criminals don't go to licensed dealers to buy their guns. And any individual who sells to someone he knows to be ineligible has broken existing law.

I'll tell ya what, when you show me that the strict registration and title requirements on cars stops all car thefts, I'll be happy to discuss any gun law you want.

So now you want to end car registration? lol
 
That's because we fight him.

-Geaux
Senatevote.jpg

A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".

Can you prosecute someone who makes a private sale to a felon if the private sale did not require a background check?

If you can show the person making the sale had knowledge that the buyer was ineligible, yes.
The seller is not exempt from due diligence.

Why not just require the background check?

The background check is not the problem, it's whose deciding what will disqualify you, and how much more strict it will become when the foots in the door
 
That's because we fight him.

-Geaux
Senatevote.jpg

A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".

Can you prosecute someone who makes a private sale to a felon if the private sale did not require a background check?

If you can show the person making the sale had knowledge that the buyer was ineligible, yes.
The seller is not exempt from due diligence.

Why not just require the background check?

Why? You going to pay for it? Are you going to make the instant check system available to everyone?
 
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

So where can I get Child Porn?

I can't legally.

Does that mean Child Porn doesn't exist? No, but it is illegal.

So right to a gun has to have limitations too.

Now to have loopholes in background checks is the same as having no background checks.

So do the gun guys here want no background checks and if so how do you propose keeping guns out of undesirables hands.

There are people who have had their right to own firearms taken from them, if they're found with one you prosecute them, just like any other crime. No law is effective in preempting crime, if they were there would be no crime, you just deal with them when they occur.

Is it illegal to sell a minor a beer?

You are saying that there is no point because convicted felon will get a gun anyway. How, if it is illegal to sell it to him?

This is about cutting the supply to people who shouldn't have a gun.

Are you really that dense, criminals do give a flying flip about any law you put on the books. The CDC has said no gun law has had any major impact on crime, including background checks, because criminals don't go to licensed dealers to buy their guns. And any individual who sells to someone he knows to be ineligible has broken existing law.

I'll tell ya what, when you show me that the strict registration and title requirements on cars stops all car thefts, I'll be happy to discuss any gun law you want.

So now you want to end car registration? lol

Why not, it's just another tax.
 
A bill designed to close loopholes in the background check system.

The opposition to this bill by the NRA and its extremist supporters PROVES that the NRA does not want to prevent ineligible people from legally obtaining guns.

Are you really that stupid, if an ineligible person obtains a gun they are already breaking the law, they can't "legally obtain a gun".

Can you prosecute someone who makes a private sale to a felon if the private sale did not require a background check?

If you can show the person making the sale had knowledge that the buyer was ineligible, yes.
The seller is not exempt from due diligence.

Why not just require the background check?

The background check is not the problem, it's whose deciding what will disqualify you, and how much more strict it will become when the foots in the door

That ship has already sailed.
 
Folks, you have to understand the liberal "mind" in order to understand why they claim the stupid things they do. For instance, on guns, they can't think past this moment right now. You see, if obama isn't knocking on our door right now, that means he isn't going to. They can't think about next year or hell even next month or tomorrow for that matter. We know that disarming Americans is the goal of the left, they can't think past this very minute. They just aren't very smart.

Said a paranoid schizophrenic.



Thanks for volunteering yourself as an example of the stupidity I was talking about.

Oh yes, I'm sure Hinkley and Lanza also had bizarre views of reality and they thought it was everyone else that was loony.

Be sure to lick your gun before bed, it is feeling unloved.

Rather odd how relatives of all these massacre victims hug their families but you bungs hug your guns. Well, odd to the normals.

Lol. Whatever you have to tell yourself loser.


You're an angry peck eh. I'm sorry to upset you, kissy kissy.

Again, no reason for discussion on this here, the gun licking side is not rational. But you arrrre angry and scared. Carry on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top