Rep. Louie Gohmert Laments That Republicans Can't Lie To Congress Or FBI

[bodecea]

We all know that the flavor of "justice" you get depends on if you are a Republican or Democrat.
Two entirely different systems.

The Republican white-wing system includes a LOT of whining. A LOT.

 

[bodecea]

The DC jury was made up of mostly democrat donors who ignored the law.

Prove that. Are you sure it wasn't a bunch of trump worshippers on that jury?

 

[bodecea]

1. Only a Democrat sheep can consider a Hillary-friendly judge and 4 Hillary supporters on the jury to be a 'fair trial', especially when the lead juror says, 'From the very start we never thought this case should be tried'.

2. 'Reasonable Doubt'

View attachment 653802

Sussmann admitted he lied, that he was working for Hillary

His text, the one the pro-Hillary judge threw out for obvious reasons, showed he admitted to working for Hillary

His own billing records showed he was working for Hillary on the exact day, the exact hour, he met with FNI lawyer Baker he billed Hillary for his services

His billing records show he charged Hillary for the 2 thumb drives he gave to FBI Lawyer Baker.

The FBI said they knew he was working for Hillary

The FBI had already warned Obama that Hillary was going to do this.

Hillary's own campaign manager testified he was sent to the FBI by Hillary


Were you dropped on your head as a small child, are you naturally stupid, or is it that you are just dishonest as hell, like the Democrats you defend?

It was at least six trump worshippers on that jury.

 

[bodecea]

So he was judge by his 'peers'...

Including at least six trump worshippers.

 

[bodecea]

So you don't see the difference between a registered voters and a Hillary supporter / donor?

Bwuhahaha

And a trump worshipper?

 

[bodecea]

Once again another snowflake pops up like a prairie dog to display their ignorance....

You obviously do not know a prosecutor abd defender only have a limited number of jury challenges...and trying to find a non-partisan juror in the DC liberal swamp is like trying to find a 5-leaf clover.

Is that why six trump worshippers were on the jury?

 

[bodecea]

'Nuh-Uh...YOU are!'
View attachment 653826

Your 'extremely mature' response is duly noted.

Well, THAT's an Ironic post.

 

[j-mac]

Louie Gohmert (R-TX) just reacted to Trump Advisor Peter Navarro’s indictment: “If you're a Republican, you can't even lie to Congress or lie to an FBI agent or they're coming after you!”

Gohmert, a former lawyer and judge, said that Navarro was the victim of “a two-tiered justice system.”

He said he was especially angered that Navarro’s indictment came in the same week that a jury acquitted Michael Sussman, a lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, of charges that he had lied to the FBI.

So, pulling his comments out of context is normal course now for progressive democrats…

 

[j-mac]

That is funny. Sussman probably paid a fortune in legal fees to fight and win that decision in court. To me, it says Gohmert would like the privilege of lying at will, without facing the legal bills of defending, when charged, win or lose. If it comes up, hopefully he will decide to take the cheap way out and just tell the truth.

Ok, you progressives first.

 

[OKTexas]

Sure Q NUT.

Decades of republican corruption.

Obama (D) – 8 yrs in office. Zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences.

Bush, George W. (R) – 8 yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences.

Clinton (D) – 8 yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. One conviction. One prison sentence. That’s right nearly 8 yrs of investigations. Tens of millions spent and 30 yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime.

Bush, George H. W. (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. One conviction. One prison sentence.

Reagan (R) – 8 yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences.

Carter (D) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment. Zero convictions and zero prison sentences.

Ford (R) – 4 yrs in office. One indictment and one conviction. One prison sentence.

Nixon (R) – 6 yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences.

Johnson (D) – 5 yrs in office. Zero indictments. Zero convictions. Zero prison sentences.

In their 25 yrs in office Democrats had a total of
three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence.

In the 28 yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53 yrs they have had a total of, 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down.


From 2017, even before the orange criminal was in office.

The Trump regimes crimes should double their total.

Yeah, I guess if you don't count Clinesmith in the maobama regime or Clinton himself. You're just not very good at this propaganda thingy, are ya?

.

 

[bodecea]

So, pulling his comments out of context is normal course now for progressive democrats…

You deny he said that? Or excuse-making?

 

[j-mac]

You deny he said that? Or excuse-making?

Not in the manner which you are framing it.

 

[White 6]

Ok, you progressives first.

I kind of think Congress critters on both sides would like to be above have to play it straight with government agencies asking questions. He is just one of the few to come out and gripe about it.

 

[j-mac]

I kind of think Congress critters on both sides would like to be above have to play it straight with government agencies asking questions. He is just one of the few to come out and gripe about it.

You do realize that wasn’t what he was getting at don’t you?

 

[White 6]

You do realize that wasn’t what he was getting at don’t you?

Tend to disregard the message of what he was wanting to get at, in light of what he said, up front. Can't work up many tears for what he was wanting to get at.

 

[forkup]

Holder was found in contempt of congress, yet his case was never presented to a grand jury, as the law requires.

No, it doesn't. Congress can refer, and the DOJ decides if they prosecute.

Brennen and Clapper both lied to congress and neither were charged.

Again it is the DOJ, in Brennan and Clappers case a DOJ led by REPUBLICANS, and they didn't press charges. There is a difference between what you consider lying and what you can prosecute. Which has a high burden for proof to accomplish.

There are plenty of examples of commies getting away scott free while republicans are charged for the same offenses.

DOJ declines to charge Meadows, Scavino with contempt of Congress for defying Jan. 6 committee

Former Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro was arrested on charges of contempt of Congress earlier Friday.

www.politico.com

The Justice Department has declined to prosecute two of Donald Trump’s closest White House advisers — former chief of staff Mark Meadows and social media director Dan Scavino — for refusing to cooperate with the Jan. 6 select committee, rejecting the House’s recommendation that the pair be charged with contempt of Congress.

Seems to me some Republicans walk while others don't. Maybe that's because there's a difference between what you believe and what you can prove in a court of law? What do you think?

 

[j-mac]

Tend to disregard the message of what he was wanting to get at, in light of what he said, up front. Can't work up many tears for what he was wanting to get at.

So, you only hear what you want to hear….got it.

 

[Clipper]

Louie Gohmert (R-TX) just reacted to Trump Advisor Peter Navarro’s indictment: “If you're a Republican, you can't even lie to Congress or lie to an FBI agent or they're coming after you!”

Gohmert, a former lawyer and judge, said that Navarro was the victim of “a two-tiered justice system.”

He said he was especially angered that Navarro’s indictment came in the same week that a jury acquitted Michael Sussman, a lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, of charges that he had lied to the FBI.

Goemert & other Trump asseaters are messing their pants, worried that Navarro may roll over on the Orange Blob & his crew of bottom feeders.

Navarro has already said he doesn't want to go to the slammer. And he can't afford millioins in lawyer fees to help protect Gangster Trump.

Eat shit, Louie.

 

[OKTexas]

No, it doesn't. Congress can refer, and the DOJ decides if they prosecute.

Again it is the DOJ, in Brennan and Clappers case a DOJ led by REPUBLICANS, and they didn't press charges. There is a difference between what you consider lying and what you can prosecute. Which has a high burden for proof to accomplish.

DOJ declines to charge Meadows, Scavino with contempt of Congress for defying Jan. 6 committee

Former Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro was arrested on charges of contempt of Congress earlier Friday.

www.politico.com

The Justice Department has declined to prosecute two of Donald Trump’s closest White House advisers — former chief of staff Mark Meadows and social media director Dan Scavino — for refusing to cooperate with the Jan. 6 select committee, rejecting the House’s recommendation that the pair be charged with contempt of Congress.

Seems to me some Republicans walk while others don't. Maybe that's because there's a difference between what you believe and what you can prove in a court of law? What do you think?

Try reading the damn contempt of congress law. Then feel free to point where the DOJ is given the discretion to present the case to a grand jury.

.

 

[j-mac]

• 

Reactions:White 6

oh yeah, I’m glad you find it funny to be willingly dishonest…