Repeal the 2nd Amendment

[cnm]

Like I said get to work on that amendment.

No need. You've more than enough school kids.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can deny any relationship you choose. Reality doesn't care.

you have not presented any data to back ANY of your claims.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You can deny any relationship you choose. Reality doesn't care.

Fact remains:
You cannot demonstrate any effect is necessarily related to any law.

 

[M14 Shooter]

No need. You've more than enough school kids.

Oh look. Another fallacious appeal to emotion.

 

[cnm]

Do you really think more laws will somehow convince those determined to kill children to not do it?

Other countries experiences show that fewer firearms in circulation means a lower firearms homicide rate and a reduced mass shooting rate.
Of course you'd need to repeal the 2nd to achieve that, but what need? You have sufficient population after all.

 

[cnm]

Oh look. Another fallacious appeal to emotion.

What? Are you saying you don't have enough school kids?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Other countries experiences show that fewer firearms in circulation means a lower firearms homicide rate and a reduced mass shooting rate.
Of course you'd need to repeal the 2nd to achieve that, but what need? You have sufficient population after all.

No they don't liar.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Other countries experiences show that fewer firearms in circulation means a lower firearms homicide rate and a reduced mass shooting rate.

You know cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between the gun laws in those countries and their lower rates of gun violence.
Thus, your statement, above, is a lie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What? Are you saying you don't have enough school kids?

Oh look. Another fallacious appeal to emotion.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You know cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between the gun laws in those countries and their lower rates of gun violence.
Thus, your statement, above, is a lie.

He is just lying since in Australia and Britian shootings are going up not down and after confiscation the rate never changed.

 

[M14 Shooter]

He is just lying....

And trolling.
He has nothing, and he knows it.

 

[cnm]

You know cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between the gun laws in those countries and their lower rates of gun violence.
Thus, your statement, above, is a lie.

I know you can and will deny anything, reality notwithstanding.

 

[hadit]

Other countries experiences show that fewer firearms in circulation means a lower firearms homicide rate and a reduced mass shooting rate.
Of course you'd need to repeal the 2nd to achieve that, but what need? You have sufficient population after all.

Again, we've had ready access to guns for centuries and only recently have school shootings become a problem. What changed? Not access to guns. My point is, you can try to eliminate guns and face a likely civil war with a lot of death, or you can deal with what's causing people to want to kill kids. We're not even dealing with that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I know you can and will deny anything, reality notwithstanding.

Fact remains:
Your statement is a lie.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I know you can and will deny anything, reality notwithstanding.

He doesn't have anything to deny you have NOT posted a single thing in support of ANY of your claims,

 

[cnm]

He is just lying since in Australia and Britian shootings are going up not down and after confiscation the rate never changed.

Only those determined to deny everything could argue the rate and severity of mass shootings in the UK did not decrease after stricter laws were introduced.

Category:Mass shootings in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[hadit]

Americans need to have laws that make firearms ownership a privilege not a right. So far, other people's school kids are a more than acceptable price to pay for that convenience.

We also accept tens of thousands of deaths on the highways every year as an acceptable price to pay for the privilege of driving fast. We accept the deaths of children slaving away in mines and environmental devastation for the privilege to feel good because we're driving an electric car. We accept the deaths of many for the privilege of wearing a pretty rock on our fingers. We always put a price tag on lives.

 

[cnm]

He doesn't have anything to deny you have NOT posted a single thing in support of ANY of your claims,

I have shown Americans prefer ease of access to firearms to the lives of other people's school children. That has been denied.

 

[cnm]

We also accept tens of thousands of deaths on the highways every year as an acceptable price to pay for the privilege of driving fast. We always put a price tag on lives.

Absolutely. We see the price you put on other people's school children. It's a bargain, eh?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Only those determined to deny everything...could argue the rate and severity of mass shootings in the UK did not decrease after stricter laws were introduced.

You are fully aware of the fact this does not prove the laws you cite caused the effect you claim.
This, you choose to lie.