Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?They just broke the news he is indicted.
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.
And the charges are?
.
To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?They just broke the news he is indicted.
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.
Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.
....WTF? ADD kicking in again?
The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.
Which isn't a crime unless you stole the documents yourself from the U.S. Government. That isn't what happened here.
They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.
And the charges are?
.
I've already said in this thread. He exposed secret information that put American lives in danger.
ROFL. Anytime you make a phone call they accuse you of wire fraud. It's a meaningless charge.The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.
Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.
....WTF? ADD kicking in again?
The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.
Dumbass the consequence is that if Assange was a witting agent he participated in a WIRE FRAUD CONSPIRACY.
To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?They just broke the news he is indicted.
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.
And the charges are?
.
I've already said in this thread. He exposed secret information that put American lives in danger.
ROFL! I'll take that as a concession.To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
...but you don't know shit, so why would it matter?
ROFL. Anytime you make a phone call they accuse you of wire fraud. It's a meaningless charge.The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.
....WTF? ADD kicking in again?
The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.
Dumbass the consequence is that if Assange was a witting agent he participated in a WIRE FRAUD CONSPIRACY.
To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?They just broke the news he is indicted.
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
Which isn't a crime unless you stole the documents yourself from the U.S. Government. That isn't what happened here.
They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.
And the charges are?
.
I've already said in this thread. He exposed secret information that put American lives in danger.
Why would I stop pointing out your stupid and wrong claims? What does fraud have to do with anything Assange did? Who did he defraud?ROFL. Anytime you make a phone call they accuse you of wire fraud. It's a meaningless charge.The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?
....WTF? ADD kicking in again?
The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.
Dumbass the consequence is that if Assange was a witting agent he participated in a WIRE FRAUD CONSPIRACY.
...just wow. Ignorance through the roof.
Seriously, just stop.
When considering all factors, prosecutors may ask judges to impose terms well in excess of 30 years for fraud offenses.
What is the Prison Sentence for Wire Fraud? - Federal Prison Consultant
That's about revealing sources, not classified information, you fucking dumbass.To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?indicted for what?
For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
To the best of YOUR knowledge?
Now that is a hoot!
Yes, it is illegal.
Can Journalists Go To Jail For Printing Classified Information? - America's Future Foundation
Apparently I missed the post where you proved you are right.Which isn't a crime unless you stole the documents yourself from the U.S. Government. That isn't what happened here.Link?
They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.
And the charges are?
.
I've already said in this thread. He exposed secret information that put American lives in danger.
Wrong. You need to stick to what you are good at, and that most certainly isn't anything involving law.
Well i guess the corrupt Trump DOJ decided to pursue it??The case against Assange was built by Obama's corrupt DOJ, no?
This should be ..interesting.
DOJ did a lot of bad stuff during the Obama years.
Not sure if necessary gvt agency or not.
The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.
Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.
....WTF? ADD kicking in again?
The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.
Dumbass the consequence is that if Assange was a witting agent he participated in a WIRE FRAUD CONSPIRACY.
That's about revealing sources, not classified information, you fucking dumbass.To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
To the best of YOUR knowledge?
Now that is a hoot!
Yes, it is illegal.
Can Journalists Go To Jail For Printing Classified Information? - America's Future Foundation
Yes, the reporter refused to give up the name of the person who printed classified information. That person probably violated the Espionage Act, but the reporter didn't.That's about revealing sources, not classified information, you fucking dumbass.To the best of my knowledge, that isn't against the law. Furthermore, Assange isn't an American. If some guy in Japan published classified American documents that someone gave him, has he committed a crime? I don't think so.He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?
He exposed it by making it public. It is no different than if a U.S. news outlet got secret information that would put American lives in danger, and they print it without asking the U.S. government first if they can print it. You need to learn the laws.
To the best of YOUR knowledge?
Now that is a hoot!
Yes, it is illegal.
Can Journalists Go To Jail For Printing Classified Information? - America's Future Foundation
It involves printing classified information... you need to read the whole fucking thing genius.
