REPORTER: Do you trust the election process this time around?

[otto105]

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

www.repdiamond.com

And this article:

Do outsized voter rolls signify fraud? No

A video on Instagram suggests that "good old fashioned, home-grown voter fraud" is persistent in the U.S. and one bit of

www.politifact.com

Makes a great case for why there needs to be frequent voter role purges.

No, it doesn't.

Did you read the fact check?

 

[theHawk]

Seriously? Uh ok..


View attachment 1021466

View attachment 1021467


It may have just been Wisconsin and Michigan, I thought there was a 3 rd state. However, both graphs, both appear to have happened around the same time, just before and just after 6am, and as of all of the votes were for Biden and Trump didn’t get any mail in ballots.

And they are already cheating here in AZ.

They won’t release the names of the 200,000+ illegally registered voters they found in AZ for this election.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That’s another thing, its like they want to ignore all the reports of areas that had more votes than registered voters.

Because those are all lies.

It's like your want to spread sore loser lies to protect an orange rapist. Even though he already discarded you guys.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

www.repdiamond.com

And this article:

Do outsized voter rolls signify fraud? No

A video on Instagram suggests that "good old fashioned, home-grown voter fraud" is persistent in the U.S. and one bit of

www.politifact.com

Makes a great case for why there needs to be frequent voter role purges.

Haha, you just debunked your own nonsense.

Good stuff.

 

[Oddball]

All lies.

In Wisconsin Fat Elvis only received about 11,000 of the 170,000 votes from Milwaukee.

So, you’re wrong and stupidity wrong at that.

Not lies, statistical facts.

Numerous precincts in Milwaukee reported more votes than residents, including minor children.

So fuck off.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not lies, statistical facts.

Numerous precincts in Milwaukee reported more votes than residents, including minor children.

So fuck off.

Lie.

And even if true, not an actual problem.

 

[otto105]

Not lies, statistical facts.

Numerous precincts in Milwaukee reported more votes than residents, including minor children.

So fuck off.

You fuckup off loser. You're just wrong and too stupid to admit it.

FACT CHECK: Did Seven Milwaukee City Wards Have Over 100% Voter Turnout?

 

[Oddball]

You fuckup off loser. You're just wrong and too stupid to admit it.

FACT CHECK: Did Seven Milwaukee City Wards Have Over 100% Voter Turnout?

Fuck your fake "fact check".

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fuck your fake "fact check".

Hahaha

Delusion freaks

 

[otto105]

Fuck your fake "fact check".

Fuckup


Those are the actual voting numbers and your bagina is triggered.

Deal with the fact your Fat Elvis lies and you parrot those falsehoods.


Stupid wanker.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Drop the delusions. You aren't questioning anything. You're doubting.

Questions have answers. You aren't honestly looking for answers.

I want a more secure election process. There are answers. Democrats seem to often fight them.

And we can all laugh at your bullshit about doubting past elections before 2020, now.

Can I make up things about you?Remember when you posted about attending the KKK rally?

And if you deny it, “we can all laugh at your bullshit”

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I want a more secure election process.

Tough shit. We already know 2020 was the most secure election in history.

You are proposing solutions for a non problem. Which puts the lie to your entire rant.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Tough shit. We already know 2020 was the most secure election in history.

LOL says who?

You are proposing solutions for a non problem. Which puts the lie to your entire rant.

If there were any breaches, it’s a problem.

If there’s obvious ways to cheat, there’s a problem.

 

[otto105]

LOL says who?

If there were any breaches, it’s a problem.

If there’s obvious ways to cheat, there’s a problem.

Can you prove in any way that it wasn’t the most secure?

You know, with actual proof…

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL says who?

Who would you consider the expert?

Hint: it ain't Rudy

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Who would you consider the expert?

I didn’t make a claim, you did.

You said “we know” that the 2020 election was the most secure in history.

Who is “we”… and how do they know? With what proof?

Hint: it ain't Rudy

Nobody brought him up but you

 

[Lastamender]

Can you prove in any way that it wasn’t the most secure?

You know, with actual proof…

81 million votes.