Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's like, you're so fucking stupid it just hurts knowing there is no chance of making you understand some basic ass shit. The Media, the fing media creates the candidate. When you have people talking on stage in debates for 15-26 min VS candidates the media gives 40 seconds of talk time, yeah, it has nothing to do with how conservative the base is.
Hillary lost because Democrats were pissed that she entrusted the Idiot Bush with the decision to invade Iraq.Yeah good luck trying to sell that Hillary lost in 2008 because Obama went farther left than she did in the primary and these guy's both have similar positions. Though the left will never admit you don't have a strong field out there Hillary is closely tied to Obama who does not have the sway with people he used to which will be a drag on her in a general election and beyond her you have no one who has any real star power or stands out.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.
They won't need to be. They're both excellent candidates and much better than the fodder offered by the republican party.
Republicans are thinking they can get a candidate elected the way that Obama was elected. By running on the embarrassing record of his predecessor. But the thing is Obama's record doesn't even come CLOSE to being as epically terrible as Bush's was.
So the GOP better get to work finding a good candidate soon or they'll be as big of losers in 2016 as they were in 2008 and 2012.
Wow that took your usual stupid to a whole new level yeah those three are about as center left moderate as Ted Cruz is center right moderate thanks for the laugh that was one of your funnier responses unintentionally as it was.Obama is not on the Left, no matter how much you wish to believe so. He's a Center-Left moderate. Just like Hillary. Just like Bill.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.I don't need any luck on that front good or bad I'm not working for any candidate by the way I asked this before and never got a answer who do the Democrats have if Hillary decides to bow out?
Well I'd prefer Jim Webb. Mark Warner would be okay too.
Bernie Sanders is on the Left. Elizabeth Warren is on the Left. Alan Grayson is on the Left.
Fer fuck's sake. You Right-Wingers can't even classify politicians correctly.
Keep drinking that kool aid.Hillary lost because Democrats were pissed that she entrusted the Idiot Bush with the decision to invade Iraq.Yeah good luck trying to sell that Hillary lost in 2008 because Obama went farther left than she did in the primary and these guy's both have similar positions. Though the left will never admit you don't have a strong field out there Hillary is closely tied to Obama who does not have the sway with people he used to which will be a drag on her in a general election and beyond her you have no one who has any real star power or stands out.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.
They won't need to be. They're both excellent candidates and much better than the fodder offered by the republican party.
Republicans are thinking they can get a candidate elected the way that Obama was elected. By running on the embarrassing record of his predecessor. But the thing is Obama's record doesn't even come CLOSE to being as epically terrible as Bush's was.
So the GOP better get to work finding a good candidate soon or they'll be as big of losers in 2016 as they were in 2008 and 2012.
That's what it came down to. The Democrats she lost because of that made the difference.
It's like, you're so fucking stupid it just hurts knowing there is no chance of making you understand some basic ass shit. The Media, the fing media creates the candidate. When you have people talking on stage in debates for 15-26 min VS candidates the media gives 40 seconds of talk time, yeah, it has nothing to do with how conservative the base is.
So, you're saying that conservatives are either so stupid, or so easily manipulated, that they abandon their principles and their values because of the Boob Tube, and Evil Libruls making them vote against their wishes?
What power we have!
You said back in 2007.
There was no teabagger party in 2007.
Never said there was.
That's the problem with extremists. Anyone who isn't as extreme as you is viewed as all the way to the other side.Wow that took your usual stupid to a whole new level yeah those three are about as center left moderate as Ted Cruz is center right moderate thanks for the laugh that was one of your funnier responses unintentionally as it was.Obama is not on the Left, no matter how much you wish to believe so. He's a Center-Left moderate. Just like Hillary. Just like Bill.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.I don't need any luck on that front good or bad I'm not working for any candidate by the way I asked this before and never got a answer who do the Democrats have if Hillary decides to bow out?
Well I'd prefer Jim Webb. Mark Warner would be okay too.
Bernie Sanders is on the Left. Elizabeth Warren is on the Left. Alan Grayson is on the Left.
Fer fuck's sake. You Right-Wingers can't even classify politicians correctly.
What's going to be your excuse when you get your ass kicked again in 2016?Keep drinking that kool aid.Hillary lost because Democrats were pissed that she entrusted the Idiot Bush with the decision to invade Iraq.Yeah good luck trying to sell that Hillary lost in 2008 because Obama went farther left than she did in the primary and these guy's both have similar positions. Though the left will never admit you don't have a strong field out there Hillary is closely tied to Obama who does not have the sway with people he used to which will be a drag on her in a general election and beyond her you have no one who has any real star power or stands out.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.
They won't need to be. They're both excellent candidates and much better than the fodder offered by the republican party.
Republicans are thinking they can get a candidate elected the way that Obama was elected. By running on the embarrassing record of his predecessor. But the thing is Obama's record doesn't even come CLOSE to being as epically terrible as Bush's was.
So the GOP better get to work finding a good candidate soon or they'll be as big of losers in 2016 as they were in 2008 and 2012.
That's what it came down to. The Democrats she lost because of that made the difference.
It's like, you're so fucking stupid it just hurts knowing there is no chance of making you understand some basic ass shit. The Media, the fing media creates the candidate. When you have people talking on stage in debates for 15-26 min VS candidates the media gives 40 seconds of talk time, yeah, it has nothing to do with how conservative the base is.
So, you're saying that conservatives are either so stupid, or so easily manipulated, that they abandon their principles and their values because of the Boob Tube, and Evil Libruls making them vote against their wishes?
What power we have!
For the most part yes, I agree with you... Hell look at you guys, supporting Obama after he started many new wars, re-entered Iraq, expanded Afghanistan and spends more than Bush on military and killing people. Obama has made the rich far more rich, Obama has helped make the middle class shrink and the poor more poor.... All by expanding Bush's progressive policies, and yet you love Obama to deff~
See how stupid people are? How easily you can be manipulated? Fuck, I bet you think NPR is neutral lol.
Your foreign policy bs- no boots, Arabs on board, no chickenhawk Pubcrappe. Economically, nothing much will change until voodoo is repealed- defended to the death by Pubs and dupes...Booosh's progressive policies- you're nuts lol.It's like, you're so fucking stupid it just hurts knowing there is no chance of making you understand some basic ass shit. The Media, the fing media creates the candidate. When you have people talking on stage in debates for 15-26 min VS candidates the media gives 40 seconds of talk time, yeah, it has nothing to do with how conservative the base is.
So, you're saying that conservatives are either so stupid, or so easily manipulated, that they abandon their principles and their values because of the Boob Tube, and Evil Libruls making them vote against their wishes?
What power we have!
For the most part yes, I agree with you... Hell look at you guys, supporting Obama after he started many new wars, re-entered Iraq, expanded Afghanistan and spends more than Bush on military and killing people. Obama has made the rich far more rich, Obama has helped make the middle class shrink and the poor more poor.... All by expanding Bush's progressive policies, and yet you love Obama to deff~
See how stupid people are? How easily you can be manipulated? Fuck, I bet you think NPR is neutral lol.
Ok, they did... Just like they did about Mitt and now like you're saying about Chris.You said back in 2007.
There was no teabagger party in 2007.
Never said there was.
You said:
based on my correct description of Dems claiming McCain had the best shot back in 2007
Explain that.
A stock market based solely on the FED pumping money into it which only helps the rich people you hate. Yes .5% growth per year is redic...I'm sorry it's pathetic. Alqida and ISIS who we are now going back to war with were defeated?A soaring stock market that went from 6,000 to 17,000? 50 straight months, or some other ridiculous figure, of job growth? The killing of America's #1 enemy?So you voted for what we now have. Nice job. This is all your fault.Republicans don't have even a single candidate. It makes me question the leadership of your party cons. What's going on?
You're an idiot.
Yea I bet you thought Romney had it locked up right?
No, I was 100% sure he would loose... And he did. I didn't vote for him. I think Mitt was a shitty candidate who the media and his money created.
I could go on, but you have your fingers in your ears.
It's like, you're so fucking stupid it just hurts knowing there is no chance of making you understand some basic ass shit. The Media, the fing media creates the candidate. When you have people talking on stage in debates for 15-26 min VS candidates the media gives 40 seconds of talk time, yeah, it has nothing to do with how conservative the base is.
So, you're saying that conservatives are either so stupid, or so easily manipulated, that they abandon their principles and their values because of the Boob Tube, and Evil Libruls making them vote against their wishes?
What power we have!
For the most part yes, I agree with you... Hell look at you guys, supporting Obama after he started many new wars, re-entered Iraq, expanded Afghanistan and spends more than Bush on military and killing people. Obama has made the rich far more rich, Obama has helped make the middle class shrink and the poor more poor.... All by expanding Bush's progressive policies, and yet you love Obama to deff~
See how stupid people are? How easily you can be manipulated? Fuck, I bet you think NPR is neutral lol.
He campaigned in 2008 on expanding the war in Afghanistan, dumbass! That's one of the reasons Democrats voted for him - he was going to refocus on the people who actually attacked us.
Now list - since you're so fond of lists - one thing that Obama has done to make the middle class and poor poorer.
I won't hold my breath waiting.
OK - I'm done toying with wingnut idiots. I'm going to go watch the Rachel Maddow re-broadcast.
So how are you simpletons working your tiny little minds through voting in a president who is now attacking Iraq, Syria, Lybia, Afghanistan etc?Hillary lost because Democrats were pissed that she entrusted the Idiot Bush with the decision to invade Iraq.Yeah good luck trying to sell that Hillary lost in 2008 because Obama went farther left than she did in the primary and these guy's both have similar positions. Though the left will never admit you don't have a strong field out there Hillary is closely tied to Obama who does not have the sway with people he used to which will be a drag on her in a general election and beyond her you have no one who has any real star power or stands out.Good guy's though I'm not sure if they would be far enough to the left for the Obama Democrats.
They won't need to be. They're both excellent candidates and much better than the fodder offered by the republican party.
Republicans are thinking they can get a candidate elected the way that Obama was elected. By running on the embarrassing record of his predecessor. But the thing is Obama's record doesn't even come CLOSE to being as epically terrible as Bush's was.
So the GOP better get to work finding a good candidate soon or they'll be as big of losers in 2016 as they were in 2008 and 2012.
That's what it came down to. The Democrats she lost because of that made the difference.
You were confused by her stupidity the first time around? If you need to watch a complete moron twice to understand the message that may be a clue you aren't very bright.OK - I'm done toying with wingnut idiots. I'm going to go watch the Rachel Maddow re-broadcast.
Not much of a leader is he?So it's all Obama's fault because he can't overcome Pub obstruction lol....
