RandallFlagg
PROUD Tea Party Member
- Dec 5, 2012
- 8,578
- 2,333
I was a Hollywood Marine, never left the West Coast in the early 80's.The Sustained Rate of Fire would be the term you need to google. About 45 rounds per minute, without aiming. 1-5 chance of hitting someone, which sounds right when you look at the data from recent Mass Shootings by democrats.How many rounds does a semi-automatic rifle fire per minute? - Quora
As fast as you can pull the trigger, up to 800 rounds per minute.
That's why the ARMALITE RIFLE was actually designed for single rate of fire (but the full auto switch - or the fun switch as we called it) was put there, to keep heads down with. Basically, on auto, it's (1) a waste of ammo and (2) inaccurate as hell.
I rarely ever had the fun switch on in Viet Nam.
It touches me to hear that you were in Viet Nam, I teach my boys to respect and honor you Vets. The best I can do, for you.
Thank you so very much. I truly appreciate it. However, please keep those vets who are coming home today in your thoughts and prayers. I was fortunate. Yes, I was wounded, but it was nothing to speak of. A couple of months in Germany and I was good as new.
These young fellas that are spending their entire careers going back and forth to the Middle East (I talked to a young SFC at the VFW the other night - 7 tours over there). It's madness. No wonder we are seeing these kids come back mentally torn to hell...
This is the result of the "volunteer" military, unfortunately. Those who enlist must carry the water for those who are too spineless to lend a hand.
My Father was a private in the Army in WWII, got a degree, returned to the newly formed Air Force and eventually became a One star General. My Brother served in the Marines and retired as a Master Gunny (2 tours in Vietnam) and (unfortunately) passed a few years back. My Son was a Lieutenant on a guided missile cruiser and my Daughter was a JAG officer in the Navy.
My way of thinking? Until a person has served (in some form) they should not have the right to vote. Just my opinion. We have far too many air heads casting ballots these days...![]()
So I assume then you always vote for candidates who have served?
I PREFER a candidate who has served. However, since politics is now a "business" and they start at an early age, there are few candidates who have the "time" (can't let the military get in the way of their "ambitions") so it is up to the conservative voter to make the best distinction possible, of the choices present. Liberals? They merely pick the most whacked out asshole they can find - even if they are in their 70s.
Last edited: