"Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal"

[Faun]

Apparantly your so blinded by what you WANT to believe that you can't read.


Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.


For the first time, it was disclosed that retired Army Gen. Carter Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, testified that he had told Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs chairman, that day that Americans in Benghazi were under attack by terrorists, not demonstrators. He said both men agreed.
They knew. They just lied about it.

The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward

Dream on dreamer.

It's been investigated, Dreamer. Seven times. Deal with it.

In finished reports after September 11, 2012, intelligence analysts inaccurately referred to the presence of a protest at the Mission facility before the attack based on open source information and limited intelligence, but without sufficient intelligence or eyewitness statements to corroborate that assertion. The IC took too long to correct these erroneous reports, which caused confusion and influenced the public statements of policymakers.

[...]

In addition, there were intelligence reports in the days following the Benghazi attacks that al-Qa'ida-associated terrorists hoped to take advantage of global protests for further attacks. As a result of evidence from closed circuit videos and other reports, the IC changed its assessment about a protest in classified intelligence reports on September 24, 2012, to state there were no demonstrations or protests at the Temporary Mission Facility prior to the attacks. This slow change in the official assessment affected the public statements of government officials, who continued to state in press interviews that there were protests outside the Mission compound.

Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi attack - Washington Post​

You poor, demented Dreamer.

 

[Claudette]

Dream on dreamer

 

[Faun]

Because I'm not stupid like you apparantly are.

Riiight. Apparently, you think the GOP is protecting Obama and Clinton.

Since I'm not a Rep I could care what you think about the GOP.

Dream on dreamer.

Who cares what political party you belong too? No doubt you vote Republican; mostly, if not entirely. Does it matter that you're too embarrassed to be a member of the party you secretly support?

 

[Faun]

Dream on dreamer

Too bad your projections fail, eh, Dreamer? You calling me a Dreamer would be as stupid as a Birther calling me a Birther. Need I remind you that I'm the one living in the real world where 7 investigations have cleared Obama and Clinton of the shit you accuse them of? You're the one living in a dream world where 7 investigations mean nothing.

 

[Claudette]

Your persistant stupidity is wearing.

Your not worth debating because you don't want to believe whats right in front of your face.

Dream on dreamer.

 

[Claudette]

Apparantly your so blinded by what you WANT to believe that you can't read.


Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.


For the first time, it was disclosed that retired Army Gen. Carter Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, testified that he had told Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs chairman, that day that Americans in Benghazi were under attack by terrorists, not demonstrators. He said both men agreed.
They knew. They just lied about it.

The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward

Dream on dreamer.

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing? You have nothing, but you continue on because you feel your voice is important and should be heard...Or something to that affect....all over a fake scandal.....Issa thanks you for donating to his cause you blind moron

Your another dreamer and not worth the bother.

Believe as you wish.

Dream on dreamer.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

“You know the FBI conducted interviews with the survivors one or two days after the attacks, ... ". US Senator Lindsay Graham.

Has anyone discussed this?

Benghazi Survivors Forced to Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements

"On Tuesday I raised the question of why none of the Benghazi survivors, whether State Department, CIA, or private security contract employees have testified publicly before Congress," said Wolf.

Do you see the word 'publicly' at the end of Wolf's statement?

You now can see how right winger propaganda works. The idiot minions the propaganda is fed to, can be relied upon to ignore the use of that word.

Vigilante's report is 16 months old and dead.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R – SC), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told Breitbart News on Tuesday that he wants to see the interviews the FBI conducted with the individuals who survived the Benghazi attacks.
“You know the FBI conducted interviews with the survivors one or two days after the attacks, and it hasn’t been released to the Congress. I just can’t get over that,” he said.

Sen. Lindsey Graham Wants FBI Interviews of Benghazi Survivors

OH! So you feel that the FBI interviews, which would lend information to the report(s) issued by the US Government, which would be the same US government which forced those being 'interviewed privately' to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements, would disclose the information which the Non-Disclosure Agreements were designed to prevent from being disclosed?

ROFLMNAO!

Folks... they're HELPLESS!

Now ask yourselves, "Would allowing people with such limited means to reason, as that demonstrated by the above contributor, tend toward the promotion of cultural viability or tend toward injuring cultural viability?"

You do not need to profess your answer... as reasonable people already know the answer.

 

[Faun]

Your persistant stupidity is wearing.

Your not worth debating because you don't want to believe whats right in front of your face.

Dream on dreamer.

Imbecile ... what's right in front of my face are 7 investigations which conclude that Dreamers like you are out of your feckin' mind. All you do is reaffirm that.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing?

Huh... so you imply in your first portion of your comment that 'they found something', then immediately conclude that 'they found nothing"?

ROFLMNAO! The reader is asked again: "Do you believe that allowing people who employ such perverse human reasoning to vote, tend towards improving cultural viability, or does it tend toward the injury of cultural viability?"

 

[kaz]

Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal
Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal Hot Air Headlines

Obama must feel really stupid for obstructing the truth then. Do you know that's why Nixon resigned? No one accused him of being part of the break in, only of covering it up. When it's your guy, a cover up is no thang.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

OS 10334819

Show me a report from the intelligence community five days after the attack that still say a protest took place before the attack on our consulate, Notfooled

The White House released CIA talking points emails that are absolute proof that it was the CIA not the WH that ran with the 'protest participation' original assessment at the consulate in Benghazi. The CIA signed off on their version five days after the attack,

Your 24 hour version appears to be a fabrication and myth.

 

[kaz]

The committee says no scandal, the far right foolish guys won't buy it.

Does not matter what the far right thinks.

No, it doesn't matter, but it pisses me off.

It always cracks me up when the far left decries extremism ... on the right ...

 

[Faun]

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing?

Huh... so you imply in your first portion of your comment that 'they found something', then immediately conclude that 'they found nothing"?

ROFLMNAO! The reader is asked again: "Do you believe that allowing people who employ such perverse human reasoning to vote, tend towards improving cultural viability, or does it tend toward the injury of cultural viability?"

How demented are you? That's not what he said. He didn't imply they found something, then concluded they found nothing. He said they investigated something, then concluded it was nothing.

 

[Plasmaball]

Apparantly your so blinded by what you WANT to believe that you can't read.


Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.


For the first time, it was disclosed that retired Army Gen. Carter Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, testified that he had told Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs chairman, that day that Americans in Benghazi were under attack by terrorists, not demonstrators. He said both men agreed.
They knew. They just lied about it.

The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward

Dream on dreamer.

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing? You have nothing, but you continue on because you feel your voice is important and should be heard...Or something to that affect....all over a fake scandal.....Issa thanks you for donating to his cause you blind moron

Your another dreamer and not worth the bother.

Believe as you wish.

Dream on dreamer.

you look like a moron with that dreamer crap.

 

[Plasmaball]

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing?

Huh... so you imply in your first portion of your comment that 'they found something', then immediately conclude that 'they found nothing"?

ROFLMNAO! The reader is asked again: "Do you believe that allowing people who employ such perverse human reasoning to vote, tend towards improving cultural viability, or does it tend toward the injury of cultural viability?"

How demented are you? That's not what he said. He didn't imply they found something, then concluded they found nothing. He said they investigated something, then concluded it was nothing.

when you have nothing, you cling to whatever so you feel relevant...

 

[Claudette]

The committee says no scandal, the far right foolish guys won't buy it.

Does not matter what the far right thinks.

No, it doesn't matter, but it pisses me off.

It always cracks me up when the far left decries extremism ... on the right ...

Yep and if Bush had been POTUS during Benghazi and did the same things Obamas administration did the left would be screaming like stuck pigs demanding an accounting.

Cracks me the hell up as well.

 

[Claudette]

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing?

Huh... so you imply in your first portion of your comment that 'they found something', then immediately conclude that 'they found nothing"?

ROFLMNAO! The reader is asked again: "Do you believe that allowing people who employ such perverse human reasoning to vote, tend towards improving cultural viability, or does it tend toward the injury of cultural viability?"

How demented are you? That's not what he said. He didn't imply they found something, then concluded they found nothing. He said they investigated something, then concluded it was nothing.

when you have nothing, you cling to whatever so you feel relevant...

Apparantly your so blinded by what you WANT to believe that you can't read.


Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.


For the first time, it was disclosed that retired Army Gen. Carter Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, testified that he had told Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs chairman, that day that Americans in Benghazi were under attack by terrorists, not demonstrators. He said both men agreed.
They knew. They just lied about it.

The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward

Dream on dreamer.

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing? You have nothing, but you continue on because you feel your voice is important and should be heard...Or something to that affect....all over a fake scandal.....Issa thanks you for donating to his cause you blind moron

Your another dreamer and not worth the bother.

Believe as you wish.

Dream on dreamer.

you look like a moron with that dreamer crap.

Speaking of morons.

 

[Plasmaball]

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing?

Huh... so you imply in your first portion of your comment that 'they found something', then immediately conclude that 'they found nothing"?

ROFLMNAO! The reader is asked again: "Do you believe that allowing people who employ such perverse human reasoning to vote, tend towards improving cultural viability, or does it tend toward the injury of cultural viability?"

How demented are you? That's not what he said. He didn't imply they found something, then concluded they found nothing. He said they investigated something, then concluded it was nothing.

when you have nothing, you cling to whatever so you feel relevant...

Apparantly your so blinded by what you WANT to believe that you can't read.


Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward.


For the first time, it was disclosed that retired Army Gen. Carter Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, testified that he had told Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the Joint Chiefs chairman, that day that Americans in Benghazi were under attack by terrorists, not demonstrators. He said both men agreed.
They knew. They just lied about it.

The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward

Dream on dreamer.

you dont think they knew this in the 7 investigations they had and found nothing? You have nothing, but you continue on because you feel your voice is important and should be heard...Or something to that affect....all over a fake scandal.....Issa thanks you for donating to his cause you blind moron

Your another dreamer and not worth the bother.

Believe as you wish.

Dream on dreamer.

you look like a moron with that dreamer crap.

Speaking of morons.

well i see you ran out of things to say fast...this is what happens when you are a bottom feeder like you are claud

 

[kaz]

The committee says no scandal, the far right foolish guys won't buy it.

Does not matter what the far right thinks.

No, it doesn't matter, but it pisses me off.

It always cracks me up when the far left decries extremism ... on the right ...

Yep and if Bush had been POTUS during Benghazi and did the same things Obamas administration did the left would be screaming like stuck pigs demanding an accounting.

Cracks me the hell up as well.

Yes, they would. There is no doubt.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Clay 10334829

Sure. After they told the American people the attack was caused by a demonstration over a video. They told that white lie for two weeks

Why can't you put up one transcript where they said the attack that resulted in the deaths of Stevens and Smith was caused by a demonstration over a video. They said plain as day after receiving CIA talking points advising them that it was extremists with possible ties to al Qaeda that brought heavy weapons to the consulate in Benghazi. Protesters killed no one anywhere in the world on 9/11/2012. It was extremists who came (protest or no protest) with heavy weapons and with possible ties to al Qaeda that were blamed for killing Stevens and Smith.

No WH official ever suggested that Woods and Dougherty were killed as a result of a protest turned violent. They were killed by mortar fire and the terrorists who fired it were never seen - protesting anything,