Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #521
I can't, that's why I asked you! Can you continue to explain that?You're too big of a moron to deal with, vagisil.Hmmm, so whatdya think, vagisil? The CIA excused them from their non-disclosure so they could write a book about their ordeal?Has anyone discussed this?
Benghazi Survivors Forced to Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements
"On Tuesday I raised the question of why none of the Benghazi survivors, whether State Department, CIA, or private security contract employees have testified publicly before Congress," said Wolf.
"According to trusted sources that have contacted my office, many if not all of the survivors of the Benghazi attacks along with others at the Department of Defense, the CIA have been asked or directed to sign additional non-disclosure agreements about their involvement in the Benghazi attacks. Some of these new NDAs, as they call them, I have been told were signed as recently as this summer."
Wolf continued: "It is worth noting that the Marine Corps Times yesterday reported that the Marine colonel whose task force was responsible for special operations in northern and western Africa at the time of the attack is still on active duty despite claims that he retired. And therefore could not be forced to testify before Congress.
"If these reports are accurate, this would be a stunning revelation to any member of Congress, any member of Congress that finds this out and also more importantly to the American people. It also raises serious concerns about the priority of the administration's efforts to silence those with knowledge of the Benghazi attack in response.
Congressman Benghazi Survivors Forced to Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements The Weekly Standard#
well Pawned, do you have any idea why these men didn't testify before the committee? You have a link to some pertinent info?
They did give testimony to the committee. We know this because they complained the final report didn't include some of their testimony.
And again, you shvance, they wrote a book about it. Explain how people under a non-disclosure can publically write about the very subject you claim they were legally bound to remain quiet on?