Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you want higher pay, have something to offer an employer that the average minimum wage earner does not have. Or you could just sit on your ass and whine.
This is why we call you "shitflinger."
Naturally you don't grasp basic business or economic questions, you're a looter, not a producer.
McDonald's will not make a capital investment until such time as the payback is attractive. When you Communists push for doubling wages - then you vastly alter the ROCE on capital equipment to replace unskilled labor. Essentially, you are putting the workers you claim to help out of work.
Naturally, your intent (rather the intent of your masters) is not to help anyone. The massive increase in wages for the least skilled and valuable is designed to break the back of the middle, the ever-persistent goal of leftism.
You don't understand economics, nor do you care, so this is not intended for you.
Arbitrary markers of fiat currency do not alter the value proposition. Menial labor does not gain value simply because a government dictates that more fiat currency is given in exchange for that labor. Instead the value of the fiat currency is reduced to the level of the value it is exchanged for. The purchasing power of the dollar declines until equilibrium is established.
Who gets fucked by all of this is exactly who the left are targeting, the lower middle class. This is nothing more or less than democrats putting a boot to the face of workers struggling to rise out of poverty and into the middle. A person works hard and proves his value, obtaining a series of raises, from $7.25 to $9, then up to $13. Then along come you communists and kick him in the face repeatedly until he is right back to minimum wage where he started
Of course this is the whole idea, what Lenin called "leveling," paying the street sweeper the same as a doctor or craftsman. The left seeks to crush the middle, the bourgeoisie, you always have. 3 years after an arbitrary mandate to pay $15 instead of $8, the purchasing power of $15 will be the same as $8 today. So what was accomplished? Simply the act of kicking those climbing out of poverty right back down to the bottom.
Shitcensored
You are obviously some type of Luddite who thinks you could stop the flow of progress by rolling back a few bucks on wages. Your silly threats to workers......You better accept lower wages or we will get robots to replace you is ridiculous
This is why we call you "shitflinger."
Naturally you don't grasp basic business or economic questions, you're a looter, not a producer.
McDonald's will not make a capital investment until such time as the payback is attractive. When you Communists push for doubling wages - then you vastly alter the ROCE on capital equipment to replace unskilled labor. Essentially, you are putting the workers you claim to help out of work.
Naturally, your intent (rather the intent of your masters) is not to help anyone. The massive increase in wages for the least skilled and valuable is designed to break the back of the middle, the ever-persistent goal of leftism.
You don't understand economics, nor do you care, so this is not intended for you.
Arbitrary markers of fiat currency do not alter the value proposition. Menial labor does not gain value simply because a government dictates that more fiat currency is given in exchange for that labor. Instead the value of the fiat currency is reduced to the level of the value it is exchanged for. The purchasing power of the dollar declines until equilibrium is established.
Who gets fucked by all of this is exactly who the left are targeting, the lower middle class. This is nothing more or less than democrats putting a boot to the face of workers struggling to rise out of poverty and into the middle. A person works hard and proves his value, obtaining a series of raises, from $7.25 to $9, then up to $13. Then along come you communists and kick him in the face repeatedly until he is right back to minimum wage where he started
Of course this is the whole idea, what Lenin called "leveling," paying the street sweeper the same as a doctor or craftsman. The left seeks to crush the middle, the bourgeoisie, you always have. 3 years after an arbitrary mandate to pay $15 instead of $8, the purchasing power of $15 will be the same as $8 today. So what was accomplished? Simply the act of kicking those climbing out of poverty right back down to the bottom.
Shitcensored
You are obviously some type of Luddite who thinks you could stop the flow of progress by rolling back a few bucks on wages. Your silly threats to workers......You better accept lower wages or we will get robots to replace you is ridiculous
Shitcensored
You are obviously some type of Luddite who thinks you could stop the flow of progress by rolling back a few bucks on wages. Your silly threats to workers......You better accept lower wages or we will get robots to replace you is ridiculous
Pretty much....looking at past record.You have a lot of class, RW. More than anyone on this board probably.
Kept their mouth shut indeed. The democrats running weren't that great either. Either way, I still would have preferred a dem victory.
Congratulations you won because you kept your mouth shut. That's classy to you??
It is true
Republicans avoided "Legitimate Rape" and "Rape is Gods blessing" type comments that Dems used to destroy them last time. Republicans ran solid campaigns that avoided controversy. A key reason they won
If you would have said they did a good job at not producing gaffs that would have been a compliment. You didn't say that though, you said they did a good job of keeping their mouth shut, which is a backhanded compliment.
Not intended to be
"Keeping your mouth shut" did not mean say nothing, it means not saying anything stupid. Democrats crucified the entire GOP in 2010 and 2012 when key candidates said stupid things
Republicans ran a clean campaign this time by avoiding hot button topics
What you said was basically if republicans would have opened up their mouths stupid things would have come out. Who are you kidding ?
Pretty much....looking at past record.Congratulations you won because you kept your mouth shut. That's classy to you??
It is true
Republicans avoided "Legitimate Rape" and "Rape is Gods blessing" type comments that Dems used to destroy them last time. Republicans ran solid campaigns that avoided controversy. A key reason they won
If you would have said they did a good job at not producing gaffs that would have been a compliment. You didn't say that though, you said they did a good job of keeping their mouth shut, which is a backhanded compliment.
Not intended to be
"Keeping your mouth shut" did not mean say nothing, it means not saying anything stupid. Democrats crucified the entire GOP in 2010 and 2012 when key candidates said stupid things
Republicans ran a clean campaign this time by avoiding hot button topics
What you said was basically if republicans would have opened up their mouths stupid things would have come out. Who are you kidding ?
OH so NOW the "low information voter" excuse is an excuse?? Well hells bells why didnt you say that for the past 6 years. I guess its a coincidence that the day after the GOP wins that THAT SAME DAY all the "low information voters" vanished!!. lol
It happens at the end of the last 3 or 4 Presidents cycles...but you're right...THIS one is extraordinary!!
Duly noted the voters are NOW the day after winning "smarter" and the day before were "low information voters" according to the GOP. No no...no excuses thats really what happened
The Low information voters voted against the Dems because of high food prices and higher Health Insurance Premiums and higher college tuition.
WOW! All those things went up in price? Price increases have NEVER happened under a republican congress!
Sure they have but not by such a large margin and so quickly.
Obama promised that the health insurance would go down and they didn't.
Then govt should take full control of it then? No?
No it is because of Government that they went up.
Feds should not be in Health Care, Housing or Education.
The Low information voters voted against the Dems because of high food prices and higher Health Insurance Premiums and higher college tuition.
WOW! All those things went up in price? Price increases have NEVER happened under a republican congress!
Sure they have but not by such a large margin and so quickly.
Obama promised that the health insurance would go down and they didn't.
Then govt should take full control of it then? No?
No it is because of Government that they went up.
Feds should not be in Health Care, Housing or Education.
Are you sure? Because I thought the purpose of private biz was to turn a profit now you're telling me private biz raise prices and increased profitability by force.
Thats sad...I feel bad for them
OH so NOW the "low information voter" excuse is an excuse?? Well hells bells why didnt you say that for the past 6 years. I guess its a coincidence that the day after the GOP wins that THAT SAME DAY all the "low information voters" vanished!!. lol
It happens at the end of the last 3 or 4 Presidents cycles...but you're right...THIS one is extraordinary!!
Duly noted the voters are NOW the day after winning "smarter" and the day before were "low information voters" according to the GOP. No no...no excuses thats really what happened
The Low information voters voted against the Dems because of high food prices and higher Health Insurance Premiums and higher college tuition.
WOW! All those things went up in price? Price increases have NEVER happened under a republican congress!
Sure they have but not by such a large margin and so quickly.
Obama promised that the health insurance would go down and they didn't.
Then govt should take full control of it then? No?
Do you want VA type healthcare for everyone? waiting 6 months for an MRI? Dying before you can get an appointment?-----------then national healthcare is for you-------------------idiot.
Awwww all you want, you used the low information voter excuse. And the reality is you lost the war on women in Colorado. It's a tired old game and you lost.Awwww
OH so NOW the "low information voter" excuse is an excuse?? Well hells bells why didnt you say that for the past 6 years. I guess its a coincidence that the day after the GOP wins that THAT SAME DAY all the "low information voters" vanished!!. lol
Obama campaigned for the Illinois governor and lost. The Democrats had the Clinton's visit states and all lost.
It happens at the end of the last 3 or 4 Presidents cycles...but you're right...THIS one is extraordinary!!
Three female Republican Governors, have done well and were re-elected.
Biden goes out on the trail a leaves a trail of losses.
The fact is Obama has blamed everyone else for the countries troubles and the voters are a lot smarter than you and can see through the smoke. The Democrats ran from Obama and the GOP tied the Democrats to Obama and they lost big.
Duly noted the voters are NOW the day after winning "smarter" and the day before were "low information voters" according to the GOP. No no...no excuses thats really what happened
The Low information voters voted against the Dems because of high food prices and higher Health Insurance Premiums and higher college tuition.
WOW! All those things went up in price? Price increases have NEVER happened under a republican congress!
Sure they have but not by such a large margin and so quickly.
Obama promised that the health insurance would go down and they didn't.
As NYC saidTell me you think your Marxist Democrats are the moderates, that would be hysterical.
"Half of Americans consider themselves moderates, and yet Libertarian candidates rarely win more than single digit support in elections."
Libertarians Are The True Political Moderates US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Who is "NYC?" That quote turns up nothing in Google. I'm not a butt lazy liberal who wants other people to do my job for me, I always do my own searching before asking.
That quote also contradicts nothing. Politicians promise free shit, particularly the Democrats. That free shit comes from someone else. There's absolutely nothing moderate about voting for politicians to take other people's property and give it to you. It's a crime, it's called armed robbery. The mob voting for it in no way makes it right.
Libertarians are pretty much the definition of moderate. We respect the property of others, and we expect to have our property respected. We believe in charity, and that it's our job to do it, not someone else's like you do. We do on the other hand realize that we need a way to resolve differences (civil courts), defend our homes (police, criminal courts) defend our country (military), recognize and protect property rights so we can utilize our own assets and manage limited resources like water and build and maintain roads.
There is nothing that is not moderate about us. There is nothing moderate about you. You openly advocate armed robbery, the destruction of anyone who opposes you and kicking in the teeth of your victims and blaming them for your crime.
That's reality, deal with it.
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................LMAO......Dad you (and I want to go on the record here) are an imbecile.
Says the Klown voting for the GOP and 'believing in' the free markets and myths and fairy tales
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................LMAO......Dad you (and I want to go on the record here) are an imbecile.
Says the Klown voting for the GOP and 'believing in' the free markets and myths and fairy tales
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
LOWEST TURNOUTS IN A MIDTERM SINCE WW2
Deal with it
Lol um yes. Those tax cuts have contributed trillions to our debt.Here is your proof. Tax cuts aren't free. Both Bush and Obama's cuts have cost us.
US Debt by President
Not too bright, are you? The level of debt is determined by SPENDING over income. Your link in no way demonstrates that tax cuts always result in less revenue.
Fail again. Does it hurt to be so damn stupid???
Oh and here's proof of the raising of the wage boosting the economy:
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44995-MinimumWage.pdf
A projection by the CBO is not proof of anything.
Also:
Are CBO Estimates Really The Gold Standard Of Accuracy - Forbes
CBO Forecast Accuracy Cato Liberty
Weird, the US has ha LONG history of increasing the min wage and despite right wingers predictions, the economy has ALWAYS boomed. Of course nothing related to increasing the min wage, but the same folks against increasing min wage SWEAR tax cuts will create jobs and boom the economy, but recent examples have said they are morons!
The economy certainly did not "boom" the last 3 times the federal minimum wage was increased.
link[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Jul 24, 2007 $5.85 for all covered, nonexempt workers Jul 24, 2008 $6.55 for all covered, nonexempt workers Jul 24, 2009 $7.25 for all covered, nonexempt workers
link
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................Says the Klown voting for the GOP and 'believing in' the free markets and myths and fairy tales
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
LOWEST TURNOUTS IN A MIDTERM SINCE WW2
Deal with it
It was estimated at 37% pops....2006 was 37.1.
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................LMAO......Dad you (and I want to go on the record here) are an imbecile.
Says the Klown voting for the GOP and 'believing in' the free markets and myths and fairy tales
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
LOWEST TURNOUTS IN A MIDTERM SINCE WW2
Deal with it
Lol um yes. Those tax cuts have contributed trillions to our debt.Not too bright, are you? The level of debt is determined by SPENDING over income. Your link in no way demonstrates that tax cuts always result in less revenue.
Fail again. Does it hurt to be so damn stupid???
Oh and here's proof of the raising of the wage boosting the economy:
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44995-MinimumWage.pdf
A projection by the CBO is not proof of anything.
Also:
Are CBO Estimates Really The Gold Standard Of Accuracy - Forbes
CBO Forecast Accuracy Cato Liberty
Weird, the US has ha LONG history of increasing the min wage and despite right wingers predictions, the economy has ALWAYS boomed. Of course nothing related to increasing the min wage, but the same folks against increasing min wage SWEAR tax cuts will create jobs and boom the economy, but recent examples have said they are morons!
The economy certainly did not "boom" the last 3 times the federal minimum wage was increased.
link[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Jul 24, 2007 $5.85 for all covered, nonexempt workers Jul 24, 2008 $6.55 for all covered, nonexempt workers Jul 24, 2009 $7.25 for all covered, nonexempt workers
link
Oh you mean DURING Dubya's/GOP's great recession, the biggest downturn since the first GOP great depression? Let me guess, it was because they increased min wages right? lol
Your graph? lol
Retirement Among Baby Boomers Contributing To Shrinking Labor Force. According to The Washington Post, many economists agree the shrinking labor force participation rate is largely explained by a demographic shift, wherein "baby boomers are starting to retire en masse"
But since 2000, the labor force rate has been steadily declining as the baby-boom generation has been retiring. Because of this, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago expects the labor force participation rate to be lower in 2020 than it is today, regardless of how well the economy does.
The incredible shrinking labor force - The Washington Post
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
LOWEST TURNOUTS IN A MIDTERM SINCE WW2
Deal with it
It was estimated at 37% pops....2006 was 37.1.
AGAIN, lowest since WW2
Awwww all you want, you used the low information voter excuse. And the reality is you lost the war on women in Colorado. It's a tired old game and you lost.
OH so NOW the "low information voter" excuse is an excuse?? Well hells bells why didnt you say that for the past 6 years. I guess its a coincidence that the day after the GOP wins that THAT SAME DAY all the "low information voters" vanished!!. lol
Obama campaigned for the Illinois governor and lost. The Democrats had the Clinton's visit states and all lost.
It happens at the end of the last 3 or 4 Presidents cycles...but you're right...THIS one is extraordinary!!
Three female Republican Governors, have done well and were re-elected.
Biden goes out on the trail a leaves a trail of losses.
The fact is Obama has blamed everyone else for the countries troubles and the voters are a lot smarter than you and can see through the smoke. The Democrats ran from Obama and the GOP tied the Democrats to Obama and they lost big.
Duly noted the voters are NOW the day after winning "smarter" and the day before were "low information voters" according to the GOP. No no...no excuses thats really what happened
The Low information voters voted against the Dems because of high food prices and higher Health Insurance Premiums and higher college tuition.
WOW! All those things went up in price? Price increases have NEVER happened under a republican congress!
Sure they have but not by such a large margin and so quickly.
Obama promised that the health insurance would go down and they didn't.
I find it odd that you would say that. My job was to calculate group health insurance rates for HMO's and health insurance companies, and I was building in 21% annual inflation rates during the Carter years.
As NYC saidTell me you think your Marxist Democrats are the moderates, that would be hysterical.
"Half of Americans consider themselves moderates, and yet Libertarian candidates rarely win more than single digit support in elections."
Libertarians Are The True Political Moderates US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Who is "NYC?" That quote turns up nothing in Google. I'm not a butt lazy liberal who wants other people to do my job for me, I always do my own searching before asking.
That quote also contradicts nothing. Politicians promise free shit, particularly the Democrats. That free shit comes from someone else. There's absolutely nothing moderate about voting for politicians to take other people's property and give it to you. It's a crime, it's called armed robbery. The mob voting for it in no way makes it right.
Libertarians are pretty much the definition of moderate. We respect the property of others, and we expect to have our property respected. We believe in charity, and that it's our job to do it, not someone else's like you do. We do on the other hand realize that we need a way to resolve differences (civil courts), defend our homes (police, criminal courts) defend our country (military), recognize and protect property rights so we can utilize our own assets and manage limited resources like water and build and maintain roads.
There is nothing that is not moderate about us. There is nothing moderate about you. You openly advocate armed robbery, the destruction of anyone who opposes you and kicking in the teeth of your victims and blaming them for your crime.
That's reality, deal with it.
GAAWWWWDDDDD I gave you the link to WHO said it
NYcarbineer
Libertarians Are The True Political Moderates US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
NOW STOP PROJECTING BUBBA
Echo Echo Echo...........chamber..................
America rejected Obama and you Dad.................yell in the Grand Canyon and you might get a response............take your daddy Obomb with you............and you can cry and get drunk.....
Enjoy.
Really? Near record low turnouts in almost EVERY state means the Prez who was the first in 50+ years to win with 52%+ of popular vote in 2008 and 2012, was means rejection? lol
ONLY in right wing 'reality' Bubba
GOPers won because of turnout more than anything else
That's a good point. If the ideas put forth by your party are so great, why couldn't you even get people from your own side to support them at the ballot box?
Turnout was low among typical Democrat bases. Turnout was high among typical Republican voting bases.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/early-exit-polls-show-a-nation-dissatisfied-1415146566
The 2014 electorate wasn 8217 t just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. - The Washington Post
LOWEST TURNOUTS IN A MIDTERM SINCE WW2
Deal with it
It was estimated at 37% pops....2006 was 37.1.
AGAIN, lowest since WW2
