Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Republicans have been fighting big spending for years. They create their election platforms on the same. This administration has been spending out of control it has to stop. There have been individual spending problems with members on each side when it comes to earmarks. This just has to stop. Both parties have to stop "buying votes" with the tax payers money and be responsible to the country for its fiscal future.
Bush was a terrible spender.
terrible "leader" too....
Bush was a terrible spender.
terrible "leader" too....
he Was good when he told the un and all the progressives to fuck off, but i the second term, he started to do the same spending shit and it was awful
But atleast cons criticize their leaders, i never see the regressives on here do that,and harry knows what i mean, the antiliberal regressives never criticize der furer, obama
Here's a clue. We had a democrat congress until 94.
A Republican congress balanced the budget, Clinton got the credit. As he should.
Early in W's presidency an incident commonly referred to as 9/11 happened.
You may have heard about it.
W. allowed 9/11 to happen, then invaded Iraq, which had nothing to do with it. Try another excuse.
Wow, you know I think the birthers are crazy, but you just put yourself right up there with them.
So a president can make really stupid mistakes as long as he/she loves his/her country? That's what you're saying.yes, we know. He beat your clowns twice so you must demonize him---we get it. Now, go back to sleep.
Bush indeed was a terrible president.
Yes, he made some dumb mistakes, but he was/is an american who loves this country
whereas obama has made many more dumb mistakes and hates this country for being what it is
If you cannot see the difference then you are dumber than a sack of toad feet.
i vote 3rd party.....voting for either of the 2 Parties will just insure that nothing changes...if you want to see change you are going to have to take a chance and cut the cord....maybe if the 2 big boys see that they are not as untouchable as they think they are they might actually wake up and start getting some quality people to run who actually think about the Country first.....as long as you folks keep voting for the same old shit you are going to be here bitching about the same old shit year after year.....like we are doing now....sorry i did not vote for any of the clowns you speak of.....im sorry i insulted your clown...all in all your party has just as many clowns as the other one.....when will they stop playing circus and start running the Country?....can you answer that?....or are you too partisan to give me an honest answer?...yes, we know. He beat your clowns twice so you must demonize him---we get it. Now, go back to sleep.
I don't know, maybe never unless we make major changes to the system. Change number 1 should be term limits for congress.
If you didn't vote for Bush, Kerry, Gore, Romney, McCain, or Obama----all clowns by your definition, who did you vote for?
or did you just stay home and vote for obama de facto?
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
yes, we know. He beat your clowns twice so you must demonize him---we get it. Now, go back to sleep.
Bush indeed was a terrible president.
Yes, he made some dumb mistakes, but he was/is an american who loves this country
whereas obama has made many more dumb mistakes and hates this country for being what it is
If you cannot see the difference then you are dumber than a sack of toad feet.
NO ONE has the money to pay unfunded MANDATES that are 200Trillion PLUS ...The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The last three republican presidents are responsible for over $12 trillion of the national debt, with tax welfare to millionaires and corporate business, and the Iraq/Afghan wars. THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY OFF THE NATIONAL DEBT. The only way it's going to get paid off, is if those with the money pay it. But cons don't want it paid off, they just want to destroy those social programs.
Ronnie Raygun almost tripled the national debt in his eight years, building nuclear bombs and a STAR WARS fantasy.
Shrub daddy doubled it again in only four years, with the start of the Iraq war.
Clinton actually balanced the budget, which Shrub Jr. destroyed in his first six months.
And Shrub Jr. also doubled the national debt again, adding more than all presidents before him added together. AND he also destroyed not only the U.S. economy, but also the global economy. He left Obama with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit, which the cons try to blame Obama for.
Obama has cut that $1.2 trillion deficit in half in the last five years, while trying to bring this country out of the GREAT RECESSION Shrub Jr. left him with. All the while, the GOP has been obstructing all efforts to do so.
And now their solution is to fuck the elderly by destroying Social Security and Medicare, fucking the poor by destroying food stamps, taking food from the mouths of children, destroying unemployment benefits to workers that have lost their jobs because the cons have allowed corporations to send all the factory jobs to China.
The cons believe that throwing the elderly and the poor out in the street is going to make this country better. Like fifty million homeless it a good idea.
If you buy the con vision, you get what you deserve.
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The GOP always talks about privatizing Social Security, but there's a dirty little secret about any such scheme that they don't usually bring up:
If you privatized Social Security, working people would start putting their payroll tax into private accounts, which means it would NOT go into the Social Security Trust Fund.
Currently the Trust Fund is about a 2 trillion dollar note that the American taxpayers owe to those who put into the Fund, because the money was borrowed for wars and entitlements and all that.
Currently, the annual payroll tax contribution can pay all of most of that year's SS recipients, without dipping into the Trust Fund.
Once that payroll tax stopped coming in though, recipients would have to be paid from the Trust Fund,
which means the Trust Fund would be cashing in tens of billions of dollars worth of bonds every year,
and the American taxpayer would have to come up with that money out the revenue in the general fund, which, oh yeah,
is already still close to a trillion dollars in annual deficit to begin with.
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The last three republican presidents are responsible for over $12 trillion of the national debt, with tax welfare to millionaires and corporate business, and the Iraq/Afghan wars. THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY OFF THE NATIONAL DEBT. The only way it's going to get paid off, is if those with the money pay it. But cons don't want it paid off, they just want to destroy those social programs.
Ronnie Raygun almost tripled the national debt in his eight years, building nuclear bombs and a STAR WARS fantasy.
Shrub daddy doubled it again in only four years, with the start of the Iraq war.
Clinton actually balanced the budget, which Shrub Jr. destroyed in his first six months.
And Shrub Jr. also doubled the national debt again, adding more than all presidents before him added together. AND he also destroyed not only the U.S. economy, but also the global economy. He left Obama with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit, which the cons try to blame Obama for.
Obama has cut that $1.2 trillion deficit in half in the last five years, while trying to bring this country out of the GREAT RECESSION Shrub Jr. left him with. All the while, the GOP has been obstructing all efforts to do so.
And now their solution is to fuck the elderly by destroying Social Security and Medicare, fucking the poor by destroying food stamps, taking food from the mouths of children, destroying unemployment benefits to workers that have lost their jobs because the cons have allowed corporations to send all the factory jobs to China.
The cons believe that throwing the elderly and the poor out in the street is going to make this country better. Like fifty million homeless it a good idea.
If you buy the con vision, you get what you deserve.
Bull effing shit!!
Bull shit is all you got, but it's not a viable rebuttal. If you've got anything to refute my OP please present it. But we all know you can't, hence your bull shit.
Bush was a terrible spender.
terrible "leader" too....
he Was good when he told the un and all the progressives to fuck off, but i the second term, he started to do the same spending shit and it was awful
But atleast cons criticize their leaders, i never see the regressives on here do that,and harry knows what i mean, the antiliberal regressives never criticize der furer, obama
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The last three republican presidents are responsible for over $12 trillion of the national debt, with tax welfare to millionaires and corporate business, and the Iraq/Afghan wars. THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY OFF THE NATIONAL DEBT. The only way it's going to get paid off, is if those with the money pay it. But cons don't want it paid off, they just want to destroy those social programs.
Ronnie Raygun almost tripled the national debt in his eight years, building nuclear bombs and a STAR WARS fantasy.
Shrub daddy doubled it again in only four years, with the start of the Iraq war.
Clinton actually balanced the budget, which Shrub Jr. destroyed in his first six months.
And Shrub Jr. also doubled the national debt again, adding more than all presidents before him added together. AND he also destroyed not only the U.S. economy, but also the global economy. He left Obama with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit, which the cons try to blame Obama for.
Obama has cut that $1.2 trillion deficit in half in the last five years, while trying to bring this country out of the GREAT RECESSION Shrub Jr. left him with. All the while, the GOP has been obstructing all efforts to do so.
And now their solution is to fuck the elderly by destroying Social Security and Medicare, fucking the poor by destroying food stamps, taking food from the mouths of children, destroying unemployment benefits to workers that have lost their jobs because the cons have allowed corporations to send all the factory jobs to China.
The cons believe that throwing the elderly and the poor out in the street is going to make this country better. Like fifty million homeless it a good idea.
If you buy the con vision, you get what you deserve.
terrible "leader" too....
he Was good when he told the un and all the progressives to fuck off, but i the second term, he started to do the same spending shit and it was awful
But atleast cons criticize their leaders, i never see the regressives on here do that,and harry knows what i mean, the antiliberal regressives never criticize der furer, obama
democrats will criticize obama when muslims criticize suicide bombers. religions are like that----------liberalism is a religion-----
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created.
Carbonated is all about bilking the TAXPAYER especially if they are rich and Conservative.The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The GOP always talks about privatizing Social Security, but there's a dirty little secret about any such scheme that they don't usually bring up:
If you privatized Social Security, working people would start putting their payroll tax into private accounts, which means it would NOT go into the Social Security Trust Fund.
Currently the Trust Fund is about a 2 trillion dollar note that the American taxpayers owe to those who put into the Fund, because the money was borrowed for wars and entitlements and all that.
Currently, the annual payroll tax contribution can pay all of most of that year's SS recipients, without dipping into the Trust Fund.
Once that payroll tax stopped coming in though, recipients would have to be paid from the Trust Fund,
which means the Trust Fund would be cashing in tens of billions of dollars worth of bonds every year,
and the American taxpayer would have to come up with that money out the revenue in the general fund, which, oh yeah,
is already still close to a trillion dollars in annual deficit to begin with.
Remind us what the Democrat plan to deal with this is.
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created. And now with the $17 trillion national debt that THEY created, the cons think they have justification to destroy those programs.
The GOP always talks about privatizing Social Security, but there's a dirty little secret about any such scheme that they don't usually bring up:
If you privatized Social Security, working people would start putting their payroll tax into private accounts, which means it would NOT go into the Social Security Trust Fund.
Currently the Trust Fund is about a 2 trillion dollar note that the American taxpayers owe to those who put into the Fund, because the money was borrowed for wars and entitlements and all that.
Currently, the annual payroll tax contribution can pay all of most of that year's SS recipients, without dipping into the Trust Fund.
Once that payroll tax stopped coming in though, recipients would have to be paid from the Trust Fund,
which means the Trust Fund would be cashing in tens of billions of dollars worth of bonds every year,
and the American taxpayer would have to come up with that money out the revenue in the general fund, which, oh yeah,
is already still close to a trillion dollars in annual deficit to begin with.
They're as clean as the road driven slush...they're LIARS.Somebody did something to get us into debt to the tune of $17 trillion...
But of course the Democrats had nothing to do with it.
Democrats = It's never our fault.
The cons have been trying to destroy Social Security, Medicare, food stamps and healthcare since they were created.
When a liberal starts off a thread with a flat lie like this one (actually four lies for the price of one this time), you know there's no point in reading further.
