Republicans want the country to fail

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

If the winds of change blow I will stand with Muslims.

5 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama

The 1st US Ambassador in over 30 years to be 'needlessly' murdered

Armed Mexican Drug Cartels - over 500 / 2 Americans dead

Aided the Muslim Brotherhood

Took the country to war on his own - without Congressional approval to do so - by dragging us into the middle of Libya's civil war to help Al Qaeida - who murdered over 1,000 Americans on 9/11/01 - to take over their own country

HIRED an Al Qaeida-associated militia to protect a US Ambassador, refused to pull him out of danger when every other nation pulled their people out, denied over 600 requests for additional security from the now-dead Ambassador, and took away 16 members of his security team AFTER 2 previous terrorist attacks on his compound and while knowing he had no QRF military response help should the promised attack on 9/11/12 occur

Dragged the US into the middle of a civil war in Syria by engaging I a Proxy War against Syria, Iran, and Russia...

Supplied, armed, trained, protected, drop leaflets to ISIS warning them of pending attacks, protected their black market oil program that funded 50% of their operations, like the attack on Paris

Proven to have been lying about ISIS and terrorism since 2010....

And this is only a partial list...of FOREIGN policy actions....Obama has engaged in.

Yeah, it is the Republicans who have been acting contrary to the best interests in the US...

:rolleyes:

WTF is wrong with Liberals?

ISIS is created by Bush as a direct result of his invasion of Iraq, ISIS was created in 2006.

End of that discussion, glad we got it covered and out of the way.
ISIS was allowed to foment and flourish as a result of obama's politically driven premature exit from Iraq.

Would you prefer that the US is still in Iraq being killed by the thousands and causing endless war? Is that YOUR policy position?
Of course not. And that wouldn't be the case nor was it the case at the time obama removed our military presence. We had the situation under control until obama blew it. All in the name of his righteous politics.
It hasn't been that long. You have a bad memory.

You really don't know what the fuck was coming if you think as long as the US kept soldiers in Iraq then Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos.
 
Obama added more debt than every US President before him, COMBINED, setting records for 'monthly', 'annual', and 'total' deficit spending while doing so.

OF COURSE he had help doing so - the bad economy he inherited and the help he received in setting those deficit-spending records was provided by the Democratic party that took a near Super Majority (5 seats shy) control of both the House and Senate, which means THEY controlled the economy, the budgets, and the spending from the last 2 years of the Bush administration through the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.

:clap:
 
Are you saying Obama didn't grow the debt?

Yes debt is an issue you moron!

Reagan raised the debt 189%

Bush raised the debt 89%


please quote the % Obama EXPLODED the debt to ..

I'll wait.
BOOOOOOSH

We'll see after his term how bad he grew the debt. He took office the debt was ten trillion it's now over 18 trillion, you do the math.


won't answer the question will you moron?

Obama increased the debt about 70% ... far from EXPLODING by Republican standards.

now stfu.

You can't even do math! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes I call it exploding because it's about 80 percent increase now and it will be over a 100 percent increase before he leaves office.

But, but . but BOOOOOSH!!!

You idiots make me laugh!

Now you shut the fuck up!!


link

Link to what?

Here's an interesting link:

+106%: Obama Has More Than Doubled Marketable U.S. Debt
 
Amount Added to the Debt for Each Fiscal Year Since 1960:

Barack Obama: Added $6.167 trillion, a 53% increase in the $11.657 trillion debt level due to President Bush at the end of his last budget, FY 2009.
  • FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
  • FY 2013 - $672 billion.
  • FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
  • FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
  • FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
  • FY 2009 - $253 billion. (Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.)
George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101% increase to the $5.8 trillion debt level at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.
  • FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. (Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act).
  • FY 2008 - $1.017 trillion.
  • FY 2007 - $501 billion.
  • FY 2006 - $574 billion.
  • FY 2005 - $554 billion.
  • FY 2004 - $596 billion.
  • FY 2003 - $555 billion.
  • FY 2002 - $421 billion.
Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase in the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993.
  • FY 2001 - $133 billion.
  • FY 2000 - $18 billion.
  • FY 1999 - $130 billion.
  • FY 1998 - $113 billion.
  • FY 1997 - $188 billion.
  • FY 1996 - $251 billion.
  • FY 1995 - $281 billion.
  • FY 1994 - $281 billion.
George H.W. Bush: Added $1.554 trillion, a 54% increase in the $2.8 trillion debt level at the end of Reagan's last budget, FY 1989.
  • FY 1993 - $347 billion.
  • FY 1992 - $399 billion.
  • FY 1991 - $432 billion.
  • FY 1990 - $376 billion.
Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, 186% increase in the $998 billion debt level at the end of Carter's last budget, FY 1981. See Did Reaganomics Work?
  • FY 1989 - $255 billion.
  • FY 1988 - $252 billion.
  • FY 1987 - $225 billion.
  • FY 1986 - $297 billion.
  • FY 1985 - $256 billion.
  • FY 1984 - $195 billion.
  • FY 1983 - $235 billion.
  • FY 1982 - $144 billion.
Jimmy Carter: Added $299 billion, a 43% increase in the $699 billion debt level at the end of Ford's last budget, FY 1977.


Reublicans SUCK !
 
Are you saying Obama didn't grow the debt?

Yes debt is an issue you moron!

Reagan raised the debt 189%

Bush raised the debt 89%


please quote the % Obama EXPLODED the debt to ..

I'll wait.
BOOOOOOSH

We'll see after his term how bad he grew the debt. He took office the debt was ten trillion it's now over 18 trillion, you do the math.
So even if the 8 Trillion figure is correct that's a growth of only 80%.

Which sounds pretty low compared to Bush/Reagan.

Why do you idiots insist on bringing up Bush and Reagan in an attempt to defend the current moron in the white house?

Why do you think Obama's policies are BAAAAAD, when Bush and Reagan's were MORE than the current President's policies by any statistic.

Bush nor Reagan are currently in office.
 
Reagan raised the debt 189%

Bush raised the debt 89%


please quote the % Obama EXPLODED the debt to ..

I'll wait.
BOOOOOOSH

We'll see after his term how bad he grew the debt. He took office the debt was ten trillion it's now over 18 trillion, you do the math.
So even if the 8 Trillion figure is correct that's a growth of only 80%.

Which sounds pretty low compared to Bush/Reagan.

Why do you idiots insist on bringing up Bush and Reagan in an attempt to defend the current moron in the white house?
Because they're told to.

no... because you have a double standard depending on whether a person has an R or a D after their name.

it isn't our fault you refuse to take responsibility for your mess.
That response has nothing to do with my post.
 
You really don't know what the fuck was coming if you think as long as the US kept soldiers in Iraq then Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos.

HOW did Iraq fall back into chaos? The country was liberated. All Obama had to do was 'protect our interest, effort, and sacrifice'. He wasn't interested. The Nobel Peace Prize winner wanted to be the guy who brought our troops home...and ended up being the guy who almost / possibly let this nation's / our military's sacrifice and effort be for nothing by pulling out too soon AND by allowing the 'JV Team' to freely enter Iraq without any opposition on Obama's behalf.

ISIS is how Iraq fell back into chaos. You remember ISIS, right? The terrorist group Obama supplied, armed, trained, protected.... Yeah - Nah, Obama had nothing to do with them or Iraq being invaded by them. He had them 'contained'.

:rolleyes:
 
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

If the winds of change blow I will stand with Muslims.

5 successful terrorist attacks on US soil under Obama

The 1st US Ambassador in over 30 years to be 'needlessly' murdered

Armed Mexican Drug Cartels - over 500 / 2 Americans dead

Aided the Muslim Brotherhood

Took the country to war on his own - without Congressional approval to do so - by dragging us into the middle of Libya's civil war to help Al Qaeida - who murdered over 1,000 Americans on 9/11/01 - to take over their own country

HIRED an Al Qaeida-associated militia to protect a US Ambassador, refused to pull him out of danger when every other nation pulled their people out, denied over 600 requests for additional security from the now-dead Ambassador, and took away 16 members of his security team AFTER 2 previous terrorist attacks on his compound and while knowing he had no QRF military response help should the promised attack on 9/11/12 occur

Dragged the US into the middle of a civil war in Syria by engaging I a Proxy War against Syria, Iran, and Russia...

Supplied, armed, trained, protected, drop leaflets to ISIS warning them of pending attacks, protected their black market oil program that funded 50% of their operations, like the attack on Paris

Proven to have been lying about ISIS and terrorism since 2010....

And this is only a partial list...of FOREIGN policy actions....Obama has engaged in.

Yeah, it is the Republicans who have been acting contrary to the best interests in the US...

:rolleyes:

WTF is wrong with Liberals?

ISIS is created by Bush as a direct result of his invasion of Iraq, ISIS was created in 2006.

End of that discussion, glad we got it covered and out of the way.
ISIS was allowed to foment and flourish as a result of obama's politically driven premature exit from Iraq.

Would you prefer that the US is still in Iraq being killed by the thousands and causing endless war? Is that YOUR policy position?
Of course not. And that wouldn't be the case nor was it the case at the time obama removed our military presence. We had the situation under control until obama blew it. All in the name of his righteous politics.
It hasn't been that long. You have a bad memory.

You really don't know what the fuck was coming if you think as long as the US kept soldiers in Iraq then Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos.
Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos had we kept our military presence there. The proof is that it did become chaotic after we withdrew.
Duh.
 
Last edited:
Obama cut the deficit from $1.3T down to $400B isn't a failure .. RW's say he didn't do that and MAKE it a failure even though they're FOS.

mitigate that

The deficit is a measure of a single year’s shortfall, the difference between what the government takes in and what it spends.

Obama grew the debt and the debt is what really fucking matters you moron!!

so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

What do you mean by proportionately?

percentage of what they earn.....
 
ISIS is created by Bush as a direct result of his invasion of Iraq, ISIS was created in 2006.

End of that discussion, glad we got it covered and out of the way.
ISIS was allowed to foment and flourish as a result of obama's politically driven premature exit from Iraq.

Would you prefer that the US is still in Iraq being killed by the thousands and causing endless war? Is that YOUR policy position?
Of course not. And that wouldn't be the case nor was it the case at the time obama removed our military presence. We had the situation under control until obama blew it. All in the name of his righteous politics.
It hasn't been that long. You have a bad memory.

You really don't know what the fuck was coming if you think as long as the US kept soldiers in Iraq then Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos.
Iraq would not have fallen back into chaos had we kept our military presence here. The proof is that it did become chaotic after we withdrew.
Duh.

duh yourself..... we pulled our troops out when we did because that was the agreement entered into by baby bush.
 
Amount Added to the Debt for Each Fiscal Year Since 1960:

Barack Obama: Added $6.167 trillion, a 53% increase in the $11.657 trillion debt level due to President Bush at the end of his last budget, FY 2009.
  • FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
  • FY 2013 - $672 billion.
  • FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
  • FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
  • FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
  • FY 2009 - $253 billion. (Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.)
George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101% increase to the $5.8 trillion debt level at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.
  • FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. (Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act).
  • FY 2008 - $1.017 trillion.
  • FY 2007 - $501 billion.
  • FY 2006 - $574 billion.
  • FY 2005 - $554 billion.
  • FY 2004 - $596 billion.
  • FY 2003 - $555 billion.
  • FY 2002 - $421 billion.
Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase in the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993.
  • FY 2001 - $133 billion.
  • FY 2000 - $18 billion.
  • FY 1999 - $130 billion.
  • FY 1998 - $113 billion.
  • FY 1997 - $188 billion.
  • FY 1996 - $251 billion.
  • FY 1995 - $281 billion.
  • FY 1994 - $281 billion.
George H.W. Bush: Added $1.554 trillion, a 54% increase in the $2.8 trillion debt level at the end of Reagan's last budget, FY 1989.
  • FY 1993 - $347 billion.
  • FY 1992 - $399 billion.
  • FY 1991 - $432 billion.
  • FY 1990 - $376 billion.
Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, 186% increase in the $998 billion debt level at the end of Carter's last budget, FY 1981. See Did Reaganomics Work?
  • FY 1989 - $255 billion.
  • FY 1988 - $252 billion.
  • FY 1987 - $225 billion.
  • FY 1986 - $297 billion.
  • FY 1985 - $256 billion.
  • FY 1984 - $195 billion.
  • FY 1983 - $235 billion.
  • FY 1982 - $144 billion.
Jimmy Carter: Added $299 billion, a 43% increase in the $699 billion debt level at the end of Ford's last budget, FY 1977.


Reublicans SUCK !
Reposted it's just too good.
 
Obama cut the deficit from $1.3T down to $400B isn't a failure .. RW's say he didn't do that and MAKE it a failure even though they're FOS.

mitigate that

The deficit is a measure of a single year’s shortfall, the difference between what the government takes in and what it spends.

Obama grew the debt and the debt is what really fucking matters you moron!!

so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

You have evidence?


Data from the Tax Foundation show that in 2008, the average income for the bottom half of taxpayers was $15,300.

This year the first $9,350 of income is exempt from taxes for singles and $18,700 for married couples, just slightly more than in 2008. That means millions of the poor do not make enough to owe income taxes.

But they still pay plenty of other taxes, including federal payroll taxes. Between gas taxes, sales taxes, utility taxes and other taxes, no one lives tax-free in America.

When it comes to state and local taxes, the poor bear a heavier burden than the rich in every state except Vermont, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy calculated from official data. In Alabama, for example, the burden on the poor is more than twice that of the top 1 percent. The one-fifth of Alabama families making less than $13,000 pay almost 11 percent of their income in state and local taxes, compared with less than 4 percent for those who make $229,000 or more.

9 Things The Rich Don't Want You To Know About Taxes

and i'm pretty sure dividend income should be taxed at the same rate as any other income
 
Last edited:
duh yourself..... we pulled our troops out when we did because that was the agreement entered into by baby bush.
Actually we pulled out due to the SOFA expiring. When we were about to get a deal done Obama suddenly demanded something that had never been asked for in these negotiations before - that the entire Iraqi Security Council agree and sign the SOFA agreement. in the past the nation's President signs the deal. There was no way every one of those reps were going to sign it...and Obama knew it.
 
The deficit is a measure of a single year’s shortfall, the difference between what the government takes in and what it spends.

Obama grew the debt and the debt is what really fucking matters you moron!!

so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

What do you mean by proportionately?

percentage of what they earn.....

No one pays taxes based on a percentage of what they earn. I'm not sure why you think this is abnormal… Everyone (assuming you're a rational thinking person) seeks to lower their effective tax rate…
 
so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

What do you mean by proportionately?

percentage of what they earn.....

No one pays taxes based on a percentage of what they earn. I'm not sure why you think this is abnormal… Everyone (assuming you're a rational thinking person) seeks to lower their effective tax rate…

Do you think we should have a flat tax rate which shifts the burden of revenue to the masses rather than the people who have the most wealth?
 
The deficit is a measure of a single year’s shortfall, the difference between what the government takes in and what it spends.

Obama grew the debt and the debt is what really fucking matters you moron!!

so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

You have evidence?

Three Fact Checks on Myths About Millionaires and the Taxes They Pay - Roosevelt Institute

and i'm pretty sure dividend income should be taxed at the same rate as any other income.

Then don't tax corporate profits, because that's where dividends come from, and the government already got their taste on that money.
 
so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

What do you mean by proportionately?

percentage of what they earn.....

No one pays taxes based on a percentage of what they earn. I'm not sure why you think this is abnormal… Everyone (assuming you're a rational thinking person) seeks to lower their effective tax rate…
Which give the lie to the specious claims by insanely wealthy liberals that they don't pay high enough taxes...
 
Amount Added to the Debt for Each Fiscal Year Since 1960:

Barack Obama: Added $6.167 trillion, a 53% increase in the $11.657 trillion debt level due to President Bush at the end of his last budget, FY 2009.
  • FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
  • FY 2013 - $672 billion.
  • FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
  • FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
  • FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
  • FY 2009 - $253 billion. (Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.)
George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101% increase to the $5.8 trillion debt level at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.
  • FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. (Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act).
  • FY 2008 - $1.017 trillion.
  • FY 2007 - $501 billion.
  • FY 2006 - $574 billion.
  • FY 2005 - $554 billion.
  • FY 2004 - $596 billion.
  • FY 2003 - $555 billion.
  • FY 2002 - $421 billion.
Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase in the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993.
  • FY 2001 - $133 billion.
  • FY 2000 - $18 billion.
  • FY 1999 - $130 billion.
  • FY 1998 - $113 billion.
  • FY 1997 - $188 billion.
  • FY 1996 - $251 billion.
  • FY 1995 - $281 billion.
  • FY 1994 - $281 billion.
George H.W. Bush: Added $1.554 trillion, a 54% increase in the $2.8 trillion debt level at the end of Reagan's last budget, FY 1989.
  • FY 1993 - $347 billion.
  • FY 1992 - $399 billion.
  • FY 1991 - $432 billion.
  • FY 1990 - $376 billion.
Ronald Reagan: Added $1.86 trillion, 186% increase in the $998 billion debt level at the end of Carter's last budget, FY 1981. See Did Reaganomics Work?
  • FY 1989 - $255 billion.
  • FY 1988 - $252 billion.
  • FY 1987 - $225 billion.
  • FY 1986 - $297 billion.
  • FY 1985 - $256 billion.
  • FY 1984 - $195 billion.
  • FY 1983 - $235 billion.
  • FY 1982 - $144 billion.
Jimmy Carter: Added $299 billion, a 43% increase in the $699 billion debt level at the end of Ford's last budget, FY 1977.


Reublicans SUCK !
Reposted it's just too good.

Yes...but is it right? Looks like he's putting the 2009 Budget on Bush....which he didn't sign. Barrack Hussein Obama did.
 
The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

What do you mean by proportionately?

percentage of what they earn.....

No one pays taxes based on a percentage of what they earn. I'm not sure why you think this is abnormal… Everyone (assuming you're a rational thinking person) seeks to lower their effective tax rate…

Do you think we should have a flat tax rate which shifts the burden of revenue to the masses rather than the people who have the most wealth?

It all depends on whether or not you care about adequately funding the government.

Considering that I don't, I would say no. I don't think there should be a flat tax.
 
so perhaps the right should stop giving tax breaks to corporations and the top 1%

:thup:

The 1 percent that pay the highest percentages in taxes?

so silly....

they pay more taxes cumulatively.... but not proportionately.

I hope that helps.

You have evidence?

Three Fact Checks on Myths About Millionaires and the Taxes They Pay - Roosevelt Institute

and i'm pretty sure dividend income should be taxed at the same rate as any other income.

Then don't tax corporate profits, because that's where dividends come from, and the government already got their taste on that money.

that's idiocy.....

seriously.

taxes are paid as income comes into the hand of the recipient.

not the predecessor of the recipient.

:rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top