Rightwingers really need to stop comparing the summer riots to the Jan 6th insurrection and here is why

Fighting for racial justice is not the same as a violent insurrection to overturn a legal presidential election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power!
  1. The United States has had “racial justice” since the moment “separate but equal” was eliminated
  2. ANTIFA never claimed they were fighting for “racial justice”. From Day 1, they openly stated their agenda was about “overturning a legal presidential election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power”!
  3. If Black Lives Matters was fighting for “racial justice”, why did their rioting stop the moment Joe Biden was sworn in? Did all racism and “police brutality” magically stop at that moment?
  4. There is no law that says it is ok to rape, murder, and riot if you are upset about “racial justice” so you cannot justify your repugnant support of their repulsive crimes with that weak and ignorant argument
  5. The “violent insurrection” was committed in May 2020 by Dumbocrats
If you’re going to create propaganda, at least create something quasi-plausible. It is so easy to expose your bullshit and your ignorance :dunno:
 
What you call voter supression means blacks only get to vote once per election
Since the only people caught voting more than once have been white...
 
  1. The United States has had “racial justice” since the moment “separate but equal” was eliminated
  2. ANTIFA never claimed they were fighting for “racial justice”. From Day 1, they openly stated their agenda was about “overturning a legal presidential election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power”!
  3. If Black Lives Matters was fighting for “racial justice”, why did their rioting stop the moment Joe Biden was sworn in? Did all racism and “police brutality” magically stop at that moment?
  4. There is no law that says it is ok to rape, murder, and riot if you are upset about “racial justice” so you cannot justify your repugnant support of their repulsive crimes with that weak and ignorant argument
  5. The “violent insurrection” was committed in May 2020 by Dumbocrats
If you’re going to create propaganda, at least create something quasi-plausible. It is so easy to expose your bullshit and your ignorance :dunno:
Untrue.

BLM wasn't rioting.

If you’re going to create propaganda, at least create something quasi-plausible. It is so easy to expose your bullshit and your ignorance.
 
The comparison between the two is simply a distraction by Trumpists for their failed coup attempt.
Claiming there was a January 6th “insurrection” is simply a distraction by Dumbocrats for their failed coup attempt in May 2020.

Here was the nation’s capital that day. Never thought I would see Washington D.C. completely on fire, but that’s what Dumbocrats did that day.
6A4FDB8C-E476-4819-951A-120BC8E5B09B.jpeg
 
Claiming there was a January 6th “insurrection” is simply a distraction by Dumbocrats for their failed coup attempt in May 2020.

Here was the nation’s capital that day. Never thought I would see Washington D.C. completely on fire, but that’s what Dumbocrats did that day.
View attachment 584724
There was no insurrection on may 20 2020.
 
There were not 574 riots. Dozens were not killed, thousands of officers were not injurder.

“The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity.”

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. The project cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.” This report also found that the over the top government response from President number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED also found was that government intervened more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”

Another funny thing was discovered during these protests, (well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. The evidence from ACLED shows that much of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organizations. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3 percent of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7 percent of events, no injuries were reported at all. In fact, they determined that the majority of violence was directed at BLM protesters. There were arrests in 5 percent of the protests. Protesters/ bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests.
The same Harvard { not likely today } that allowed Alexander Solzhenitsyn
have a speech.That was before even little cutie Edie Sedgewick attended Radcliffe
at that time Harvards Women's College.
Harvard has been overtaken the last 4 decades by Liberalism.
If Barack Obama is any indictation.Where Obama was mentored by the
person who Re-invented Critical Theory by convoluting into Critical Race Theory.
Professor Derrick Bell.
 
Notice how IM2 has a propaganda profile pic that replaces truly great men with black people? Like all on the left, he’s a raging racist asshole.
 
The issue of riots concerns selling off black victimization to prepare for elections. That is about most things Democrat, they sell victim roles daily and project all the time.

It simply happens to be an issue that the left wing cares about. It does not somehow represent the natural behavior of liberals or democrats, they're dependent on others, and there's no such thing as a left liberal anymore anyway. Most of the people dead from those riots were the black people involved, so I guess that makes it alright in Billy terms.

The erection one year ago today was directly related to the Democrats making a spectacle of the election process, including victimization tactics surrounding covid for which the Democrats knew they'd benefit. The intentions of the communist elite was to remove Trump from power. They made up a story about how 4 people died and 4 capitol police officers committed suicide following the event, because the left are dramatic, and there just wasn't enough juice to splash all of the frustrated single women and white social justice warriors.
 
Last edited:
“The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity.”

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. The project cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.” This report also found that the over the top government response from President number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED also found was that government intervened more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”

Another funny thing was discovered during these protests, (well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. The evidence from ACLED shows that much of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organizations. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3 percent of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7 percent of events, no injuries were reported at all. In fact, they determined that the majority of violence was directed at BLM protesters. There were arrests in 5 percent of the protests. Protesters/ bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests.

1641534156976.png
 
Notice how IM2 has a propaganda profile pic that replaces truly great men with black people? Like all on the left, he’s a raging racist asshole.
Those are truly great men. Apparently you can't accept that blacks can have great people people among us. Like all on the right, you're a raging racist asshole.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top