Roy Moore handwriting 1 and 2 - the same

[Dschrute3]

The accuser has been proven to be a liar. She admitted forging the inscription. Her and her scummy lawyer Allred, need to be held accountable. But even if he did sign the yearbook, it doesn't make him a 'Child Rapist.'

Democrats can't even get their stories straight. Did he make 'unwanted advances', or did he 'rape' the girl? It really is disgusting what they've done to this man. I truly hope it comes back to haunt Democrats down the road. All this heinous B.S. to steal a Senate Seat. Shame on em.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

LOL, only in a kangaroo court. The date matters not, the fact that a 32 year old man signed the yearbook of a high school student is abnormal at best. When the Judge claims he does not know any of those girls, common sense suggests he's more than a bubble off center.

 

[Harryhands]

And when did she add that date? We need to know. Because if she did it recently it means she was setting it up with a date that would bolster her claim that she quit the day after.

Good to see her story falling fucking apart.

We don't need her story to know what a creep he is. No decent person would vote for him but y'all will. he's your kind of guy, a moral-less child molester.

And here you have convicted him without proof and in the face of fraud against him. That means that nothing you say has any cred. You lose dickwad.

The pattern makes sense and the women are believable not to mention what he has admitted to himself. This is an election not a court of law. The rules are different, dummy.

 

[DarkFury]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

When you alter evidence it gets tossed. That IS the law. Now go away loser.

 

[TNHarley]

Who gives a shit if he did or didnt come on to this one young girl? He has ADMITTED to scoping out teenage girls that arent even old enough to drive. Whats bad is, he didnt think that was bad so he said on the record...
Holy shit

 

[Harryhands]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

When you alter evidence it gets tossed. That IS the law. Now go away loser.

The evidence is him writing in the yearbook of a teenage girl he claims never to have met.

 

[tinydancer]

And when did she add that date? We need to know. Because if she did it recently it means she was setting it up with a date that would bolster her claim that she quit the day after.

Good to see her story falling fucking apart.

We don't need her story to know what a creep he is. No decent person would vote for him but y'all will. he's your kind of guy, a moral-less child molester.

And here you have convicted him without proof and in the face of fraud against him. That means that nothing you say has any cred. You lose dickwad.

The pattern makes sense and the women are believable not to mention what he has admitted to himself. This is an election not a court of law. The rules are different, dummy.

Two accusers who are sketchy at best.

 

[PredFan]

The answer to the question is simple. Have the yearbook examined by experts. But Allred won’t allow it. Why? Because her case would be dead if the truth came out, obviously.

Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?

Is Moore in control of wether there’s an investigation or not? No, he is t. It’s a bull shit dodge by Allred. If the examination proves that he wrote it, then there will be an investigation. Has to be. She is simply refusing to let it be examined prior to the election. Why? Likely because it’s a complete fraud. Why else?

 

[tinydancer]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

LOL, only in a kangaroo court. The date matters not, the fact that a 32 year old man signed the yearbook of a high school student is abnormal at best. When the Judge claims he does not know any of those girls, common sense suggests he's more than a bubble off center.

He doesn't remember either of his sexual misconduct accusers. So fucking what. 40 years ago.

 

[DarkFury]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

When you alter evidence it gets tossed. That IS the law. Now go away loser.

The evidence is him writing in the yearbook of a teenage girl he claims never to have met.

It was standard practice to sign year books of grads. He may have signed several hundred. Who would recall them all?

 

[Harryhands]

And when did she add that date? We need to know. Because if she did it recently it means she was setting it up with a date that would bolster her claim that she quit the day after.

Good to see her story falling fucking apart.

We don't need her story to know what a creep he is. No decent person would vote for him but y'all will. he's your kind of guy, a moral-less child molester.

And here you have convicted him without proof and in the face of fraud against him. That means that nothing you say has any cred. You lose dickwad.

The pattern makes sense and the women are believable not to mention what he has admitted to himself. This is an election not a court of law. The rules are different, dummy.

Two accusers who are sketchy at best.

There is none so blind as those who refuse to see, and your eyes and mind are both closed.

 

[Harryhands]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

When you alter evidence it gets tossed. That IS the law. Now go away loser.

The evidence is him writing in the yearbook of a teenage girl he claims never to have met.

It was standard practice to sign year books of grads. He may have signed several hundred. Who would recall them all?

He's not a teacher. Just stop trying to spin. You're pathetic at it.

 

[PredFan]

And when did she add that date? We need to know. Because if she did it recently it means she was setting it up with a date that would bolster her claim that she quit the day after.

Good to see her story falling fucking apart.

We don't need her story to know what a creep he is. No decent person would vote for him but y'all will. he's your kind of guy, a moral-less child molester.

And here you have convicted him without proof and in the face of fraud against him. That means that nothing you say has any cred. You lose dickwad.

The pattern makes sense and the women are believable not to mention what he has admitted to himself. This is an election not a court of law. The rules are different, dummy.

Do you ever read the shit you post?

The pattern makes sense to who? Butthurt leftists?

You know what he has admitted to himself???

This may be an election, but you can’t commit fraud, especially if you are an attorney.

 

[HappyJoy]

The answer to the question is simple. Have the yearbook examined by experts. But Allred won’t allow it. Why? Because her case would be dead if the truth came out, obviously.

Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?

Is Moore in control of wether there’s an investigation or not? No, he is t. It’s a bull shit dodge by Allred. If the examination proves that he wrote it, then there will be an investigation. Has to be. She is simply refusing to let it be examined prior to the election. Why? Likely because it’s a complete fraud. Why else?

Who said it was up to Moore? I think the senate should take it up.

 

[Tresha91203]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

She added a date and a location to her own yearbook at the same time it was signed by Moore, that is not a criminal offense

Who brings their yearbook from last May to a dinner date in December with someone not associated with the school? While I do believe RM was chasing after teenage girls, something is very "off" here.

 

[DarkFury]

The answer to the question is simple. Have the yearbook examined by experts. But Allred won’t allow it. Why? Because her case would be dead if the truth came out, obviously.

Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?

Is Moore in control of wether there’s an investigation or not? No, he is t. It’s a bull shit dodge by Allred. If the examination proves that he wrote it, then there will be an investigation. Has to be. She is simply refusing to let it be examined prior to the election. Why? Likely because it’s a complete fraud. Why else?

Gloria "Duke Lacrosse" Alred no less!

 

[miketx]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

And when one part of the evidence has been tampered with they throw the whole thing out.

There is no "tampering".

Can't prove it though can you?

 

[Muhammed]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.

So who wrote it?

Who wrote the note? Well it looks like Moore's handwriting.

Even if you think it was his handwriting, it is idiotic to maintain that it is some sort of evidence on malfeasance.

Hasn't anyone ever asked to sign your yearbook?

 

[Zander]

All the LWNJ's have are......

 

[Harryhands]

Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.

And when one part of the evidence has been tampered with they throw the whole thing out.

There is no "tampering".

Can't prove it though can you?

Yes, in can be proved, mainly because his writing to two different teenage girls is the same. There's no point in denying that.