Harryhands
Member
- Dec 8, 2017
- 79
- 12
- 21
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
The evidence is he is lying when he says he never met her, which he obviously did.Even if you think it was his handwriting, it is idiotic to maintain that it is some sort of evidence on malfeasance.How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.
So who wrote it?
Who wrote the note? Well it looks like Moore's handwriting.
Hasn't anyone ever asked to sign your yearbook?