Roy Moore handwriting 1 and 2 - the same

Moore is not fit to serve in the senate for a myriad of reasons.
He thinks there shouldn’t be a separation between church and state.
He’s a stone cold racist..
He’s been thrown off the bench two times.
And it stretches the boundaries of credibility that all nine women are lying.
If we’ve learned anything the past 2 months is we have to believe the women who accuse rich powerful white men of sex assault.

Fox's Gregg Jarrett: Moore is not fit to serve in the Senate
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.





How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

Just another day in the rednecks deplorables world. This happens all the time in small towns in the south, give them youngins.

You are a butthurt liar.

Just what am I butthurt about?
 
Who wrote the note? Well it looks like Moore's handwriting.
Even if you think it was his handwriting, it is idiotic to maintain that it is some sort of evidence on malfeasance.

Hasn't anyone ever asked to sign your yearbook?
The evidence is he is lying when he says he never met her, which he obviously did.
Actually you are lying.

Moore said that he presided over her divorce case, jackass. He did not say that he never met her.

Funny, Moore seemed to have lied about presiding over her divorce case too.

Roy Moore’s Evidence Against Accuser Was Wrong
Your farticle is a ridiculous anonymous source.

No Name. No Date.

Sure, buddy. Whatever you say.

Court records dispute Moore campaign claim that he had additional contact with accuser, presided over her divorce
 
Moore is not fit to serve in the senate for a myriad of reasons.
He thinks there shouldn’t be a separation between church and state.
He’s a stone cold racist..
He’s been thrown off the bench two times.
And it stretches the boundaries of credibility that all nine women are lying.
If we’ve learned anything the past 2 months is we have to believe the women who accuse rich powerful white men of sex assault.

Fox's Gregg Jarrett: Moore is not fit to serve in the Senate

Say it ain't so.
 
The answer to the question is simple. Have the yearbook examined by experts. But Allred won’t allow it. Why? Because her case would be dead if the truth came out, obviously.

Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?
If he is going to sue her, he has to testify under oath. And he is ready to take her to court. Allred is the one that is backing down. But now since the accuser has admitted altering the inscriptions in the yearbook, that shows to the court, that it is proven that she is a manipulating liar. And so her testimony must be backed up with evidence. Her integrity is shot. That nasty heifer doesn't knows how many real victims has been stained by her lies. Now everytime when a woman says that she has been victimized, that nobody will believe her. I guessed that this was a set up by the Clintons. Bill Clinton probably will be having more victims from all across the globe, coming up accusing him of rape. Now since that woman stained other accusers names, that they will be afraid to step up to the plate. Knowing that nobody will believe them. Nice trick that the Clintons had done.





Fuctard brings up the Clinton’s like his masters insists he does. But leaves out the serial sex offender president we’re now unfortunate to have..
 
Why wouldn't she want a date and place record of when and where this happened?

benghazi.jpg
 
Who wrote the note? Well it looks like Moore's handwriting.
Even if you think it was his handwriting, it is idiotic to maintain that it is some sort of evidence on malfeasance.

Hasn't anyone ever asked to sign your yearbook?
The evidence is he is lying when he says he never met her, which he obviously did.
Actually you are lying.

Moore said that he presided over her divorce case, jackass. He did not say that he never met her.

Funny, Moore seemed to have lied about presiding over her divorce case too.

Roy Moore’s Evidence Against Accuser Was Wrong
the racists in Alabama sees this child sex offender as the salt of the earth. In reality he’s the scum of the earth. No wonder DEPLORABLES are attracted to him.
You are obviously projecting.

1) You cannot produce any sort of hard evidence against him, so all you do is resort to accusing him of things that you have done.

2) You can call him a pedophile all you want, but your obvious lies indicate that it's all psychological projection. Left wing felons of your ilk often blame other people for their own crimes.

And you can whine from behind bars.
 
Last edited:
The answer to the question is simple. Have the yearbook examined by experts. But Allred won’t allow it. Why? Because her case would be dead if the truth came out, obviously.

Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?
If he is going to sue her, he has to testify under oath. And he is ready to take her to court. Allred is the one that is backing down. But now since the accuser has admitted altering the inscriptions in the yearbook, that shows to the court, that it is proven that she is a manipulating liar. And so her testimony must be backed up with evidence. Her integrity is shot. That nasty heifer doesn't knows how many real victims has been stained by her lies. Now everytime when a woman says that she has been victimized, that nobody will believe her. I guessed that this was a set up by the Clintons. Bill Clinton probably will be having more victims from all across the globe, coming up accusing him of rape. Now since that woman stained other accusers names, that they will be afraid to step up to the plate. Knowing that nobody will believe them. Nice trick that the Clintons had done.






Allred is backing down? When is Moore going to sue, cuz he hasn't even filed a case in court yet, what is he waiting for?
That is why that they had to bring out the truth. It is because Senator Moore was going to take it to court. And so they better clean up the mess.


Roy Moore says he will file lawsuit against The Washington Post


Where is the lawsuit again? As of now it doesn't exist.

The only physical evidence of slander was that yearbook. If proven that it was a fraud, that whomever stands behind the yearbook as legitimate. Will be sued. And so they had to admit that the yearbook was a fraud, so that Senator Moore will not have any solid evidence against them. He cannot bring this matter up in court, because it was already has been established as a fraud. And so they had hurried up before he started the lawsuit. If they would of had done it after he had started the process, that they can be sued if proven to be a fraud. And so they had cleaned it up with a little twist to it.
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

Well ow that you have some paint on a paper, this proves everything! Not...

If democrats are ready to false accuse someone of rape, you really think they aren't willing to... write on a paper?
 
View attachment 164989
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
And when one part of the evidence has been tampered with they throw the whole thing out.
There is no "tampering".

Roy Moore accuser admits she wrote part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama Senate candidate

:lmao::lmao::lmao:


Who ever attributed the date and location to Moore?

Fox has become outright scummy.
BECOME scummy? Fox has been the pits since the 90’s.

They always had counter narratives but now they've gone to straight up, baldfaced lying.
 
10C6C058-7290-4B44-8F5F-0B81BE927D1C.jpeg
Whether that pervert Moore wins or loses its a win win for the democrats. If he loses a dem gets a seat in the red red state of Alabama.
If he wins, the GOP will be forced to answer the same question over and over again from now until Nov 2018: How does it feel to have a child molester on your side in Congress?
 
She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.

So who wrote it?

Who wrote the note? Well it looks like Moore's handwriting.
Even if you think it was his handwriting, it is idiotic to maintain that it is some sort of evidence on malfeasance.

Hasn't anyone ever asked to sign your yearbook?
The evidence is he is lying when he says he never met her, which he obviously did.
Actually you are lying.

Moore said that he presided over her divorce case, jackass. He did not say that he never met her.
That is not what he said. Go and look it up for yourself.
 
View attachment 164990 Whether that pervert Moore wins or loses its a win win for the democrats. If he loses a dem gets a seat in the red red state of Alabama.
If he wins, the GOP will be forced to answer the same question over and over again from now until Nov 2018: How does it feel to have a child molester on your side in Congress?

Show me the conviction ass wipe.
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.


Counterfeit Money: How to Spot Fake Bills
That's just utterly idiotic. Look at the two pieces of writing, they are the same, by the same person. A child could see that and they could also see in the first one that more than one person wrote part of it, the top part versus the bottom part. You are so far from grasping at straws that you can't even see the Dairy Queen on the horizon anymore.

Even if it is his signature, what crime is it to sign a yearbook? It means nothing. Nothing at all. It's the fact she added the date to make it appear to bolster her story. The date is crucial to her fairy tale to prove she quit the day after.

She's toast.
How many 30 year old non relatives sign teenage yearbooks you child molester sympathizer?

He had signed her yearbook 2 months ago. And she isn't a 14 yearsold. She is an old lady that even her son doesn't believe her story.
He had signed her yearbook 2 months ago.

WTF?

Liar.
 
Allred wants an investigation to go along with any forensic examination, why isn't Moore interested in that?
If he is going to sue her, he has to testify under oath. And he is ready to take her to court. Allred is the one that is backing down. But now since the accuser has admitted altering the inscriptions in the yearbook, that shows to the court, that it is proven that she is a manipulating liar. And so her testimony must be backed up with evidence. Her integrity is shot. That nasty heifer doesn't knows how many real victims has been stained by her lies. Now everytime when a woman says that she has been victimized, that nobody will believe her. I guessed that this was a set up by the Clintons. Bill Clinton probably will be having more victims from all across the globe, coming up accusing him of rape. Now since that woman stained other accusers names, that they will be afraid to step up to the plate. Knowing that nobody will believe them. Nice trick that the Clintons had done.






Allred is backing down? When is Moore going to sue, cuz he hasn't even filed a case in court yet, what is he waiting for?
That is why that they had to bring out the truth. It is because Senator Moore was going to take it to court. And so they better clean up the mess.


Roy Moore says he will file lawsuit against The Washington Post


Where is the lawsuit again? As of now it doesn't exist.

The only physical evidence of slander was that yearbook. If proven that it was a fraud, that whomever stands behind the yearbook as legitimate. Will be sued. And so they had to admit that the yearbook was a fraud, so that Senator Moore will not have any solid evidence against them. He cannot bring this matter up in court, because it was already has been established as a fraud. And so they had hurried up before he started the lawsuit. If they would of had done it after he had started the process, that they can be sued if proven to be a fraud. And so they had cleaned it up with a little twist to it.



Neat fact, they didn't 'admit the yearbook is a fraud'. So, have fun with that.
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.

Well ow that you have some paint on a paper, this proves everything! Not...

If democrats are ready to false accuse someone of rape, you really think they aren't willing to... write on a paper?
So, those are forgeries then? Both from teenage girls, which Moore dated, and neither knew of the other? Keep spinning but try to do it well.
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.





How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

Just another day in the rednecks deplorables world. This happens all the time in small towns in the south, give them youngins.

You are a butthurt liar.

Am I dick breath? Do you live in a small town in the deep south? If you do you're blind.

Where is your proof that Moore did anything wrong, liar? Where is it liar?
 
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968

Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.





How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?

Just another day in the rednecks deplorables world. This happens all the time in small towns in the south, give them youngins.

You are a butthurt liar.

Just what am I butthurt about?

That you lost, your candidate lost, your party is in shambles, none of your lies work anymore.
 

Forum List

Back
Top