- Oct 6, 2008
- 125,093
- 60,648
Can You Believe How Much Bilge They'll Swallow...
....the Leftists, the reliable Democrat voters, the Lock-Step-Liberals, the government school grads????
The very same dolts who foam at the mouth when believers stand up for religion, demand evidence and proof!
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration, or collusion of the Trump folks and Russia: no evidence necessary!
1. It's the sort of horrifying phenomenon that one simply cannot take their eyes off: a horrible traffic accident, or a snake swallowing a little bird......supposedly educated, adult, thinking human beings who will accept clearly, distinctly, manifestly provable lies...simply because they are put out by the political party they've aligned themselves with.
These dunces behave less like thinking human beings, and more iron filings in a magnetic field.
2. OK....here we go: Long story short.
a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.
b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.
There is nothing astounding in the proof of the two claims above....but what is astounding is how resolute Bills wife's voters are in slamming their eyes closed when the facts are provided.
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts:
4. Lying sleaze Democrat "Rep. Adam Schiff .... ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee ... successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
....Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
5. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
6. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
The truth, and nothing but the truth!!!
More in a moment.
....the Leftists, the reliable Democrat voters, the Lock-Step-Liberals, the government school grads????
The very same dolts who foam at the mouth when believers stand up for religion, demand evidence and proof!
But not when it comes to Obama surveillance of the new administration, or collusion of the Trump folks and Russia: no evidence necessary!
1. It's the sort of horrifying phenomenon that one simply cannot take their eyes off: a horrible traffic accident, or a snake swallowing a little bird......supposedly educated, adult, thinking human beings who will accept clearly, distinctly, manifestly provable lies...simply because they are put out by the political party they've aligned themselves with.
These dunces behave less like thinking human beings, and more iron filings in a magnetic field.
2. OK....here we go: Long story short.
a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.
b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.
There is nothing astounding in the proof of the two claims above....but what is astounding is how resolute Bills wife's voters are in slamming their eyes closed when the facts are provided.
Long time fav, Kimberly Strassel, of the WSJ, put the whole soap opera together...
Here, as a public service......the facts:
4. Lying sleaze Democrat "Rep. Adam Schiff .... ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee ... successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
....Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
5. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
6. We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation... was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
... Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials.
Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials.
Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia.
Third, ... they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed.
Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked.
Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration." What Devin Nunes Knows
The truth, and nothing but the truth!!!
More in a moment.
Last edited:
