Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,094
- 71,313
- 3,645
Wow, I was pretty clear. Maybe re read.What exactly do you think I should have acknowledged?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, I was pretty clear. Maybe re read.What exactly do you think I should have acknowledged?
You know who's loving this? China
China likes stability and probably aint too crazy about incineration of trading partners.You know who's loving this? China
That depends. So, not necessarily.Nukes is a line you do not cross unless your country is being invaded
The tangible point is to strengthen Ukraine's economic status and to cast an embargo of Ukraine in a new light.The question I am asking - that you don't have the answers to - are what are the commitments being made by admittance and what are the unintended consequences
That depends. So, not necessarily.
It certainly is a line the US crosses when nukes have been launched against the US. We even have a set playbook for how to respond.
It's not a line you cross if someone else's country is being invaded or even nuked. I suspect they would go the war crimes route instead. This is pretty simple, Russia invading Ukraine did not result in the US sending in it's military. The US has already said they will not fly planes in the no fly zone for fear of a plane being shot down and the US being forced to retaliate. Why would a tactical nuke be any different? Because that's probably the extent of Russia's nuclear options. It would be a battlefield nuke.
I don't know how we can afford anything other than that policy.The US cannot afford a policy of we will only use nukes if they are used on us
Putin knows better than to cross that line
And changes nothing that is happening on the ground today?The tangible point is to strengthen Ukraine's economic status and to cast an embargo of Ukraine in a new light.
The symbolic point is the unity of Europe and western values against an authoritarian war criminal.
Are you suggesting that doesn't already exist? Hell even Switzerland condemned Russia's actions. I'm pretty sure Europe is unified like never before now that the bear has moved in next door. It appears the light bulb has been finally turned on. Pretty sure their arms expenditures will be going up for the foreseeable future too. Given Europe's dependence upon Russian natural gas I would bet it's going to be a cold winter in Europe too. And all of this falls under the category of predictable surprises.The symbolic point is the unity of Europe and western values against an authoritarian war criminal.
He has stated as much on multiple occasions. You think you're clever. I speak as many languages as you, comrade.Oh, offcourse, you're the private brain surgeon of Putin and really know, what he think and what he believes!!! Amazing!
Not immediately, no. That isn't the point of it. What a bizarre standard you contrived, there.And changes nothing that is happening on the ground today?
They are pretty much on the sidelines in this one. They already share a border with Russia and have a long history with them. They are just hoping that if things go south that missiles don't come their way. Everything else is gravy as their rival will get weakened and their customers will need more steel. It's all good for them. They don't have to do a thing. They can sit back and let the West do the heavy lifting.China likes stability and probably aint too crazy about incineration of trading partners.
One doesn't have to be in a life or death situation to know that other opinions may be of help in a life or death situation, hotshot.You know this how? How many life or death situations have you been in?
"Life and Death"...LOL
Dumb Leftist
That standard is called reality. Nothing contrived about it. Contrived would be believing a hollow symbol matters or makes a difference. But you are still missing my point. There are unintended consequences to admitting Ukraine into the EU; specifically lowering the standard of admittance and Russia's response.Not immediately, no. That isn't the point of it. What a bizarre standard you contrived, there.
To a simpleton who doesn't think more than a week into the future, maybe.That standard is called reality.
I think that the unintended consequences are a reality and will be digested before Ukraine is included.That standard is called reality. Nothing contrived about it. Contrived would be believing a hollow symbol matters or makes a difference. But you are still missing my point. There are unintended consequences to admitting Ukraine into the EU; specifically lowering the standard of admittance and Russia's response.
You literally just said it had no immediate effect. If you wish to go out on a limb - shooting from the hip - to name some future effects that may have bearing on the war that is happening now, please feel free to do so. But until then you are just pontificating.To a simpleton who doesn't think more than a week into the future, maybe.
Rational adults who have responsibility and have to make long-term decisions appear to see it differently.
That's the problem with Putin the evil kleptocrat invading European countries 3 times in 15 years:I think that the unintended consequences are a reality and will be digested before Ukraine is included.
Correct.You literally just said it had no immediate effect.
If the EU is smart they will slow play it.I think that the unintended consequences are a reality and will be digested before Ukraine is included.