1srelluc
Diamond Member
Sometimes the simple solutions are the best.I saw it happen in James Bond movie, so it has to be real
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sometimes the simple solutions are the best.I saw it happen in James Bond movie, so it has to be real
When people were saying that the US was responsible, i thought that idea was preposterous. Now im reading that Sweden did an investigation, but they are now refusing to share what they found. That is way too strange for me to overlook. No one needs to know about any advanced techniques used, we just need to know what they found.No link. Desperate attempt at an OP... Try the conspiracy forum.
Frankly, her story was based on what she has dug up and flies in the face of Fox's Carlson. Fox apparently doesn't muzzle their reporters for going against their most popular commentator. In fact, Griffin has always maintained the U.S. had nothing to do with this explosion. I'd personally like to think Joe did it but I will not 'cancel' Griffin even though I might disagree, she's always been a straight shooter.There is "reporting" and there is reporting, Leo!
Fake news or people with an agenda is not reporting IMO!
But hey, we all have our opinions.![]()
A charge can be attached to the pig. I know they don't blow up on their own, I'm not an idiot.The kinds of pigs they send through pipelines don't blow up ... that's just common sense my friend ...
Over-pressurizing the line gets the same results without all the physical evidence left over ... something Fox News watchers wouldn't understand ...
Over-pressurizing the line gets the same results without all the physical evidence left over ... something Fox News watchers wouldn't understand ...
...unless explosives were put inside the pig. Pressure wouldnt destroy 50 meters of pipe, but a bomb sure would.The kinds of pigs they send through pipelines don't blow up ... that's just common sense my friend ...
Over-pressurizing the line gets the same results without all the physical evidence left over ... something Fox News watchers wouldn't understand ...
I just saw it on Fox. Couldn't find the story on line. I am not attempting to prove anything, just throwing it out there. Frankly, I thought Biden did it.
I saw it on Bret Baier's Special Report today. Stop calling me a liar, asshole.I don't think you saw it on Fox. Or anywhere. If you did it would have been the major headline everywhere since it's the current trend to hate Russia.
You made a statement but aren't trying to prove it? Interesting tactic.
You're just "throwing it out there"? That sounds like the opposite of you actually hearing it. Sounds more like "I want attention so here is a half baked idea I came up with".
Just heard it has been reported that a Russian 'pig' was used to blow up the pipeline because the blast came from INSIDE the pipeline. A 'pig' is a unit sent through a pipeline to inspect it.
Just heard it has been reported that a Russian 'pig' was used to blow up the pipeline because the blast came from INSIDE the pipeline. A 'pig' is a unit sent through a pipeline to inspect it.
Yes, that is what pigs do in pipelines but, according to reports, this explosion came from inside the pipeline so it's not out of line to think Russia did it, IMO.
Oh stop patronizing and projecting. I do all the above AND watch Fox and the MSM. I use different search engines and don't trust Google, Microsoft Edge either.Here's a tip.........dump ALL MSM sources yes including FOX. Do some research using what ever point of view you subscribe to. The truth is out there it just takes an open mind and an open heart. NOTHING is what it seems.
What browser do you use?Oh stop patronizing and projecting. I do all the above AND watch Fox and the MSM. I use different search engines and don't trust Google, Microsoft Edge either.
The kinds of pigs they send through pipelines don't blow up ... that's just common sense my friend ...
Over-pressurizing the line gets the same results without all the physical evidence left over ... something Fox News watchers wouldn't understand ...
Oh stop patronizing and projecting. I do all the above AND watch Fox and the MSM. I use different search engines and don't trust Google, Microsoft Edge either.
Pressure build up would cause it to rupture at its weakest point. There wouldnt be a 50 meter long weak point. That seems very unlikely.I guess people who don't watch Fox news wouldn't understand pressurizing a line that is blocked at one end creates back pressure where the pressure is being generated from by X over X distance.
Nordstreamm is about 800 miles long, and 4.5m in diameter which is 4 ft 11in so we will just round up to 5ft.
So there are 4,224,000 in 8 miles.
Then the diameter is 5ft so that's 143,316,943,583 inches of volume.
Now I don't know the amount of force required to rupture it but I'm sure it's quite a lot considering it's made of steel encased in concrete. Now do you really think they have something that could generate that much pressure to fill something that large?
But back to my original point. You create pressure over a distance the air occupying the system at the furthest end actually generates back pressure where at a certain point where the air being pushed in actually generates more pressure from it's source. The greater the distance the more pressure put on at the source and eventually needs a more reinforced source than the furthest. So whatever pressure it takes to break a 800 mile 5 ft wide steel concrete encased tube would need to be reinforced 30 to 40 more times at it's source.
Do you actually believe the Russians would do all of this? Or do only Fox news viewers have a at least a basic understanding of general physics and math?
They are talking about this kind of pig...Where did you hear that Leo? in The Babylon Bee?![]()