RW’s: because children have freedom of speech, does that mean kids should own guns too?

[Billy000]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

As a child I had full access to guns and ammo all my life, I was given my first gun for my birthday at the age of 12. The difference between now and then, people don't teach their children that actions have consequences and personal responsibility. Children back then were taught never to consider aiming a gun at another person, of course we were also taught to respect teachers and police. If we violated those rules there was a major price to pay, thanks to you regressives, it's not like that anymore.

So take your little play gotcha questions and shove it up your ass, people like you are responsible for the shape this country is in today. Enjoy MF.


.

lol what’s funny about this, ok Texas, is that you actually think your anecdotal experience as a child somehow serves as an example of legal precedent of anything.

At the age of 11 I walked into a Western Auto store and legally purchased a 20ga shotgun and a box of ammo, walked the 6 blocks home and no one thought a damn thing about it, how's that for a legal precedent, It should be like that today.


.

So you got nothing when I answered your stupid question in the OP? Let children have guns and let darwin sort them out. No reason to just let the little gang bangers have them.


.

How else can this be explained to you? Your personal experience with guns means DICK when it comes to creating laws.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Yes, that is exactly what the right wishes for.

You see the kids want our country to be like Africa! You'll find kids with guns everywhere there.

 

[cnelsen]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

I had guns when I was a kid. Every kid I knew did, too. Our parents gave them to us and taught us how to use them.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

Sure.

Why not.

Mine did.

 

[Missourian]

Show me the law that says a child can't own a firearm with their parents consent...I'll wait.

The point is, it’s illegal for children to buy guns. It doesn’t fucking matter if they get parental consent.

Show me that law then...The law that says a child can't buy a gun...because I'm betting that law says a person under 18 cannot buy a long gun from an Federal Firearm License holder.

I could sell, or gift my son or daughter a firearm without violating any law.

 

[OKTexas]

As a child I had full access to guns and ammo all my life, I was given my first gun for my birthday at the age of 12. The difference between now and then, people don't teach their children that actions have consequences and personal responsibility. Children back then were taught never to consider aiming a gun at another person, of course we were also taught to respect teachers and police. If we violated those rules there was a major price to pay, thanks to you regressives, it's not like that anymore.

So take your little play gotcha questions and shove it up your ass, people like you are responsible for the shape this country is in today. Enjoy MF.


.

lol what’s funny about this, ok Texas, is that you actually think your anecdotal experience as a child somehow serves as an example of legal precedent of anything.

At the age of 11 I walked into a Western Auto store and legally purchased a 20ga shotgun and a box of ammo, walked the 6 blocks home and no one thought a damn thing about it, how's that for a legal precedent, It should be like that today.


.

So you got nothing when I answered your stupid question in the OP? Let children have guns and let darwin sort them out. No reason to just let the little gang bangers have them.


.

How else can this be explained to you? Your personal experience with guns means DICK when it comes to creating laws.

I gave you an example of how the law was in the past, at least till one of your commie comrades decided to shoot Kennedy. I think we should return to those laws and deal harshly with anyone that would abuse them, just like we did then.


.

 

[Missourian]

My folks gave me a Stevens Model 15 when I was 14. My Dad tells me about taking his Winchester Model 1894 32-20 to school so he could go hunting right after school let out.

 

[Dale Smith]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

Children don't have freedom of speech, numskull.

Yes, they do. No child in the history of the US has ever been charged with a crime for simply saying something. Yeah, there are consequences to what they say, but adults have that same problem. Just see what happens if you call that black guy the N-word while being at work.

Children have "first amendment rights"? When they are in school and being indoctrinated?????.... without consequences?
No, the second amendment is pretty fucking clear and is in the order of importance for a reason.

Commie fucks like you don't like the second amendment because it's a HUGE roadblock as it pertains to the end game the commies seek. Want our guns? You will get the ammo and spent shells first......

You are so fucking dumb. You can’t address the actual points in my thread and you’re too much of a pussy to admit it.

You made no salient point. You are equating children's alleged first amendment right to the 2nd amendment as if they are somehow related. Should children be allowed to have consensual sex with an adult because that should be their right? We have first amendment rights but there can also be consequences for it. The first amendment protects free speech, the second amendment insures the first.

You are an intellectual lightweight and you have got nothing.

 

[Missourian]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

 

[Billy000]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

I had guns when I was a kid. Every kid I knew did, too. Our parents gave them to us and taught us how to use them.

None of that matters. I am talking about the actual legality of kids owning guns.

 

[Billy000]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

This refers to the gun show loophole. All that matters is the federal law that kids can’t purchase guns. Even so, my point is, even the most insane gun nuts in this country agree that kids shouldn’t own guns. That’s the point.

 

[Billy000]

Now, I know your answer to that is “no”, but think about this: what does that say about the 2nd amendment’s limitations? Doesn’t that mean gun control already has a legal precedent? If you think current gun control laws are illegal, then WHY would giving guns to kids be an exception when we think about the legal bounds of the constitution? After all kids are not at all mentioned in the amendment.

Children don't have freedom of speech, numskull.

Yes, they do. No child in the history of the US has ever been charged with a crime for simply saying something. Yeah, there are consequences to what they say, but adults have that same problem. Just see what happens if you call that black guy the N-word while being at work.

Children have "first amendment rights"? When they are in school and being indoctrinated?????.... without consequences?
No, the second amendment is pretty fucking clear and is in the order of importance for a reason.

Commie fucks like you don't like the second amendment because it's a HUGE roadblock as it pertains to the end game the commies seek. Want our guns? You will get the ammo and spent shells first......

You are so fucking dumb. You can’t address the actual points in my thread and you’re too much of a pussy to admit it.

You made no salient point. You are equating children's alleged first amendment right to the 2nd amendment as if they are somehow related. Should children be allowed to have consensual sex with an adult because that should be their right? We have first amendment rights but there can also be consequences for it. The first amendment protects free speech, the second amendment insures the first.

You are an intellectual lightweight and you have got nothing.

Um gun retards like you like think any gun control laws are unconstitutional yet you will support laws that bar 5 year olds from purchasing a gun. That’s the point. The first amendment applies to ALL Americans yet common sense law prevents kids from buying guns. According to your logic about limiting the 2nd amendment, it SHOULD be legal for kids to own guns.

 

[Dale Smith]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

This refers to the gun show loophole. All that matters is the federal law that kids can’t purchase guns. Even so, my point is, even the most insane gun nuts in this country agree that kids shouldn’t own guns. That’s the point.

But they can decide their gender??????

 

[Billy000]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

This refers to the gun show loophole. All that matters is the federal law that kids can’t purchase guns. Even so, my point is, even the most insane gun nuts in this country agree that kids shouldn’t own guns. That’s the point.

But they can decide their gender??????

Incredibly stupid point because nothing in the constitution says they can’t do it legally.

Moron.

 

[Dale Smith]

Children don't have freedom of speech, numskull.

Yes, they do. No child in the history of the US has ever been charged with a crime for simply saying something. Yeah, there are consequences to what they say, but adults have that same problem. Just see what happens if you call that black guy the N-word while being at work.

Children have "first amendment rights"? When they are in school and being indoctrinated?????.... without consequences?
No, the second amendment is pretty fucking clear and is in the order of importance for a reason.

Commie fucks like you don't like the second amendment because it's a HUGE roadblock as it pertains to the end game the commies seek. Want our guns? You will get the ammo and spent shells first......

You are so fucking dumb. You can’t address the actual points in my thread and you’re too much of a pussy to admit it.

You made no salient point. You are equating children's alleged first amendment right to the 2nd amendment as if they are somehow related. Should children be allowed to have consensual sex with an adult because that should be their right? We have first amendment rights but there can also be consequences for it. The first amendment protects free speech, the second amendment insures the first.

You are an intellectual lightweight and you have got nothing.

Um gun retards like you like think any gun control laws are unconstitutional yet you will support laws that bar 5 year olds from purchasing a gun. That’s the point. The first amendment applies to ALL Americans yet common sense law prevents kids from buying guns. According to your logic about limiting the 2nd amendment, it SHOULD be legal for kids to own guns.

I also support acts, statutes, codes and ordinances that prevents a child from having sex with an adult or imposes on him or her having to decide what their gender is. We have rules in place to prevent minors from drinking....is that an infringement on what you perceive is their rights? The entire argument is unbelievably STUPID.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

are the left wingers getting dumber?

 

[Billy000]

Yes, they do. No child in the history of the US has ever been charged with a crime for simply saying something. Yeah, there are consequences to what they say, but adults have that same problem. Just see what happens if you call that black guy the N-word while being at work.

Children have "first amendment rights"? When they are in school and being indoctrinated?????.... without consequences?
No, the second amendment is pretty fucking clear and is in the order of importance for a reason.

Commie fucks like you don't like the second amendment because it's a HUGE roadblock as it pertains to the end game the commies seek. Want our guns? You will get the ammo and spent shells first......

You are so fucking dumb. You can’t address the actual points in my thread and you’re too much of a pussy to admit it.

You made no salient point. You are equating children's alleged first amendment right to the 2nd amendment as if they are somehow related. Should children be allowed to have consensual sex with an adult because that should be their right? We have first amendment rights but there can also be consequences for it. The first amendment protects free speech, the second amendment insures the first.

You are an intellectual lightweight and you have got nothing.

Um gun retards like you like think any gun control laws are unconstitutional yet you will support laws that bar 5 year olds from purchasing a gun. That’s the point. The first amendment applies to ALL Americans yet common sense law prevents kids from buying guns. According to your logic about limiting the 2nd amendment, it SHOULD be legal for kids to own guns.

I also support acts, statutes, codes and ordinances that prevents a child from having sex with an adult or imposes on him or her having to decide what their gender is. We have rules in place to prevent minors from drinking....is that an infringement on what you perceive is their rights? The entire argument is unbelievably STUPID.

Your opinion about those issues is irrelevant since the 2nd amendment says NOTHING about kids being barred from purchasing guns. The same logic applies to the first amendment. We have since laws forbidding defamation of character and owning child pornography. Why not create further gun control laws?

 

[Dale Smith]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

This refers to the gun show loophole. All that matters is the federal law that kids can’t purchase guns. Even so, my point is, even the most insane gun nuts in this country agree that kids shouldn’t own guns. That’s the point.

But they can decide their gender??????

Incredibly stupid point because nothing in the constitution says they can’t do it legally.

Moron.

So, you believe that children should be able to decide that they want sex change surgery or be treated like the opposite gender before they are even fully developed.... but you are worried about a 12 year old kid having a .22 caliber rifle....see how stupid YOUR argument is????

 

[Dale Smith]

Children have "first amendment rights"? When they are in school and being indoctrinated?????.... without consequences?
No, the second amendment is pretty fucking clear and is in the order of importance for a reason.

Commie fucks like you don't like the second amendment because it's a HUGE roadblock as it pertains to the end game the commies seek. Want our guns? You will get the ammo and spent shells first......

You are so fucking dumb. You can’t address the actual points in my thread and you’re too much of a pussy to admit it.

You made no salient point. You are equating children's alleged first amendment right to the 2nd amendment as if they are somehow related. Should children be allowed to have consensual sex with an adult because that should be their right? We have first amendment rights but there can also be consequences for it. The first amendment protects free speech, the second amendment insures the first.

You are an intellectual lightweight and you have got nothing.

Um gun retards like you like think any gun control laws are unconstitutional yet you will support laws that bar 5 year olds from purchasing a gun. That’s the point. The first amendment applies to ALL Americans yet common sense law prevents kids from buying guns. According to your logic about limiting the 2nd amendment, it SHOULD be legal for kids to own guns.

I also support acts, statutes, codes and ordinances that prevents a child from having sex with an adult or imposes on him or her having to decide what their gender is. We have rules in place to prevent minors from drinking....is that an infringement on what you perceive is their rights? The entire argument is unbelievably STUPID.

Your opinion about those issues is irrelevant since the 2nd amendment says NOTHING about kids being barred from purchasing guns. The same logic applies to the first amendment. We have since laws forbidding defamation of character and owning child pornography. Why not create further gun control laws?

"Why not create further gun control laws?"

Such as? How many more laws do you think should be created? How many drug laws are there? How many people are still able to attain them and sell them??????

 

[Billy000]

In 30 states, a child can still legally own a rifle or shotgun - The Washington Post

This refers to the gun show loophole. All that matters is the federal law that kids can’t purchase guns. Even so, my point is, even the most insane gun nuts in this country agree that kids shouldn’t own guns. That’s the point.

But they can decide their gender??????

Incredibly stupid point because nothing in the constitution says they can’t do it legally.

Moron.

So, you believe that children should be able to decide that they want sex change surgery or be treated like the opposite gender before they are even fully developed.... but you are worried about a 12 year old kid having a .22 caliber rifle....see how stupid YOUR argument is????

What? The point is dumbass, what you or I think should he legal is irrelevant to the actual US constitution that says the 1st amendment is just as powerful as the 2nd since both are in the bill of rights.