Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're dimmer than humanly possible.The anti-Constitutional stance of the left on clear display for all to see.Inevitably, gun proponents and the NRA will claim that the latest ruling allowing families of the Sandy Hook massacre of children, is a ridiculous ruling.....They will follow up with various scenarios that were someone to be killed by a knife or a rope, that knives and rope manufacturers could ALSO be sued....but when making such comparisons they show both their prejudices and downright stupidity.
Guns are manufactured virtually SOLELY for the purpose of killing....whereas knives or ropes have much different purposes and the flooding of some high-crime areas with weapons whose main purpose is killing of maiming is totally unacceptable.
This ruling is a small but necessary first step toward restoring sanity. The Sandy Hook massacre could not have been as lethal with knives or ropes. Let us join the rest of the sane, and progressive world community where those weapons (mostly made for military purposes) do NOT make their way into deranged and evil hands.
Anyone with a double digit IQ or the ability to think for themselves knows what this is about.
"The anti-Constitutional stance of the left on clear display for all to see."
Not true at all.
The only people who talk about banning are the gun nutters.
They are instructed to do that as a smoke screen to hide the real issues - which are being discussed in this thread.
My dad gave us guns. Seriously, christmas 1987 I got a marlin model 60 and one of those buckets of a buttload of bullets. Still have that here some place. I can't day I got special treatment, but I can day I never felt the urge to shoot anyone I was mad at. It was a very weird idea.yup my folks were hippies.
Then let's have a tax to vote too
How about a free speech tax
How about a search and seizure tax
or a tax to invoke the fifth amendment
If you can't pay any of these taxes on your Constitutional right s then tough shit you can't exercise them
Every time I walk out of my house armed, I pray I don't have to use it. Anti-gun Nazis really believe that people who carry are itching to pull that trigger on another human being.
My first gun was purchased after my apartment was robbed, and the people that did it were connected and very dangerous. I made sure they knew I was then armed. They thought I didn't know who robbed me, but I knew quite well who did it.
They used to come around and I didn't want these people here. They asked strange questions about me and my activities. I told them that I had a friend come over from time to time and pick up my car so it looked like I wasn't home. I told them I was going to get even with the MF's that robbed me even if I have to take time off of work to set them up.
They quit coming around and I haven't seen them since. That was 30 years ago.
You know with background checks, of course a criminal wouldn't think of getting a gun without going through a background check first, and, of course, when he takes the LEGAL route to obtain his weapon that he plans to commit crimes with . . . we want to make it more expensive for him to so. Outlawing particular guns are definitely going to help deter criminals from getting those guns because they wouldn't THINK of breaking a law.
gun dealer?....the dealer im talking about sells out of the trunk of his car....so adam would have got them from someone else....
The guy had no job, no money, and frankly, probably would have looked just seedy enough to make even most gun dealers look at him twice.
But I'd be all for suing whoever gave him a gun.
So you wouldn't sue the person he killed so he could take a gun.
guess what-the Banoid assholes claimed that crime would go up as a result of the ban dying
THEY WERE WRONG. They are lying assholes . Gil Douchebag has no business holding office since he is crapping over the constitution he took an oath to protect
better idea-put the assholes who filed the lawsuit into the poor house and bankrupt the ass wart attorneys who filed that crap.
Can someone,anyone explain the basis for a lawsuit against a gun manufacturer other then the gun malfunctioned
or failed to perform as advertised?....
If the gun worked properly how can the manufacturer be held liable....for anything?....
The peoples right to keep (own) and bear arms shall not be infringedThen let's have a tax to vote too
How about a free speech tax
How about a search and seizure tax
or a tax to invoke the fifth amendment
If you can't pay any of these taxes on your Constitutional right s then tough shit you can't exercise them
Again, there's no constitutional right to weapon ownership. Sorry, I know you want to think there is, but there isn't.
Scalia's taking a dirt nap, and your bizarro interpretation of the MILITIA AMENDMENT is done.
So you wouldn't sue the person he killed so he could take a gun.
If his mother had lived, I'd be all for prosecuting her crazy Prepper ass. And then letting all the dykes in prison know exactly what she did.
Do you even know what a "military grade" weapon is??Can someone,anyone explain the basis for a lawsuit against a gun manufacturer other then the gun malfunctioned
or failed to perform as advertised?....
If the gun worked properly how can the manufacturer be held liable....for anything?....
again, you need to go back to the Tobacco Lawsuit. It wasn't the design of the product that was the issue, it was the business practices of the industry.
The thing was, Bushmaster sold a military grade weapon to a woman who was mentally unstable with a son who was outright crazy. They pushed to sell increasingly dangerous weapons to unstable people.
That's why they are liable.
Can someone,anyone explain the basis for a lawsuit against a gun manufacturer other then the gun malfunctioned
or failed to perform as advertised?....
If the gun worked properly how can the manufacturer be held liable....for anything?....
again, you need to go back to the Tobacco Lawsuit. It wasn't the design of the product that was the issue, it was the business practices of the industry.
The thing was, Bushmaster sold a military grade weapon to a woman who was mentally unstable with a son who was outright crazy. They pushed to sell increasingly dangerous weapons to unstable people.
That's why they are liable.
Ever hear of a slippery slope?? LOLHow is no guns for citizens to defend themselves better?
Find EXACTLY where any of us stated "no guns for citizens"???
You right wing morons use the same lame script...try thinking on your own.....its fun.
