Sandy Hook families can sue gun manufacturers.

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

 

[Wry Catcher]

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in the UK: 0.06

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in France: 0.21

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in the US: 3.43

There are other violent crimes besides homicides you know

And in the UK they don't classify a any death as a murder unless someone is convicted of murder

House of Commons - Home Affairs - Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence

Look at section 2 paragraph 35

. Since 1967, homicide figures for England and Wales have been adjusted to exclude any cases which do not result in conviction,

We call any death not deemed suicide or an accident a murder

You've never read a coroners report, what you want to call murder, the coroner describes as "at the hands of another".

 

[Skull Pilot]

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in the UK: 0.06

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in France: 0.21

Gun homicide rate per 100,000 in the US: 3.43

There are other violent crimes besides homicides you know

And in the UK they don't classify a any death as a murder unless someone is convicted of murder

House of Commons - Home Affairs - Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence

Look at section 2 paragraph 35

. Since 1967, homicide figures for England and Wales have been adjusted to exclude any cases which do not result in conviction,

We call any death not deemed suicide or an accident a murder

You've never read a coroners report, what you want to call murder, the coroner describes as "at the hands of another".

Doesn't change the fact that all deaths as far as the FBI is concerned that are not suicides, accidents, or deemed otherwise due to negligence are tallied as homicides.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

 

[hadit]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

And how does that prove the original contention, that gun manufacturers are doing what tobacco companies did and making their products addictive?

Edit to add: A gun certainly does give a woman walking alone a sense of confidence and power.

 

[jon_berzerk]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

maybe in your twisted mind butt head

 

[Skull Pilot]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

What kind of impact?

 

[jon_berzerk]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

What kind of impact?

his post demonstrates why he should not be allowed a firearm

 

[kwc57]

The point is so simple that it defies logic.....The point IS that such lethal weapons should NEVER be sold to common citizens.

You are quite insane, and fully evil.

Wanting to save children's lives is "insane" and "evil"?

What is insane and evil is is lining the pockets of Repub congress, NRA lobbyists and gun makers at the expense of innocent children.

Here's an idea. Protect the children instead of making them convenient targets in gun free zones.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

And how does that prove the original contention, that gun manufacturers are doing what tobacco companies did and making their products addictive?

Edit to add: A gun certainly does give a woman walking alone a sense of confidence and power.

That sense is exactly the point, having a gun impacts judgment and can lead to someone walking into harm's way.

 

[Rustic]

The point is so simple that it defies logic.....The point IS that such lethal weapons should NEVER be sold to common citizens.

You are quite insane, and fully evil.

Wanting to save children's lives is "insane" and "evil"?

What is insane and evil is is lining the pockets of Repub congress, NRA lobbyists and gun makers at the expense of innocent children.

Here's an idea. Protect the children instead of making them convenient targets in gun free zones.

...And Buy more guns and ammo.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Guns are manufactured virtually SOLELY for the purpose of killing....

This is a lie; as your entire argument rests on a lie, it fails.
Miserably.

 

[Centinel]

The thing was, Bushmaster sold a military grade weapon to a woman who was mentally unstable with a son who was outright crazy.

No, they didn't.

 

[hadit]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

And how does that prove the original contention, that gun manufacturers are doing what tobacco companies did and making their products addictive?

Edit to add: A gun certainly does give a woman walking alone a sense of confidence and power.

That sense is exactly the point, having a gun impacts judgment and can lead to someone walking into harm's way.

It also leads to the vulnerable among us having richer, fuller, more independent lives. How many smaller or elderly women relish the idea that they cannot move around their neighborhood without an escort?

 

[2aguy]

Damn, it stinks that this false flag crap just won't die. Whatever. Anyway, that Lanza got the guns was his mother's fault. Had she not been killed she would be the one who should face civil action as well as criminal charges. It was HER fault the boy got the weapon. Period. A law suit against Remington won't do anything but make them charge more for guns. In the end, they will lose. It's a shame that in this country acountability in flat out gone. I'm fat and is someone else's fault, I cut my finger, it's the knife makers fault because they made the knife sharp.

Fuck you. Fuck you big mother fucking time.

She liked to hunt. HOW THE HELL IS SHE RESPONSIBLE FOR HER FUCKED UP KID?..

First, she facilitated the murder of all those children by making the gun avaliable to her sick offspring. In most states had she not been shot she would have had charges brought and rightfully so. So fuck yo, fuck you big time. She is just as guilty for those dead kids as her son.deal with it.

Made it available? He stole the guns and killed her. There's not a state in the Union that would prosecute her even if they COULD prosecute a dead person. It's not like she handed him the gun and then stood there reloading for him.

Can't say for sure anyway else, but it can and has happened here. And the feds can make a case if they wanted to. Adam Lanzas mom is probubly pretty lucky she ain't around to find out, oh, and seeing that she did not properly secure the guns, she would have been the one who should have been held liable monitarily, not the gun companies.

How do you know she did not secure the guns? The notes they have from the shooter show he was planning this for about 2 years........do you really think a methodical planner, who was willing to commit murder of children......couldn't have gotten past whatever she did to secure her weapons?

 

[Rustic]

Buy more guns and. Ammo

 

[2aguy]

There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.

Have you read 2AGuy's posts recently? He frankly makes a crack addict going through withdrawls look sedate when you suggest he can't have a gun.

A gun is just a gun, it has no hypnotic powers.

Wrong. A gun gives its possessor a sense of power, and has an impact on how s/he will act. The simple possession of a gun will impact judgment.

And how does that prove the original contention, that gun manufacturers are doing what tobacco companies did and making their products addictive?

Edit to add: A gun certainly does give a woman walking alone a sense of confidence and power.

That sense is exactly the point, having a gun impacts judgment and can lead to someone walking into harm's way.

Wrong........that is you talking out of your ass.....

There are were over 320,000,000 million guns in private hands in 2013.....there were 8,124 gun murders in that time, 90% of the shooters were convicted criminals who should not have been able to own or carry those guns and had them illegally......so no, it isn't the 356,991,876 million guns in private hands and the people who have them who make poor judgements simply because they have a gun......it is sociopaths with long criminal records...
.

you are wrong......356,991,876 million times you are wrong.

 

[2aguy]

Fuck you. Fuck you big mother fucking time.

She liked to hunt. HOW THE HELL IS SHE RESPONSIBLE FOR HER FUCKED UP KID?..

First, she facilitated the murder of all those children by making the gun avaliable to her sick offspring. In most states had she not been shot she would have had charges brought and rightfully so. So fuck yo, fuck you big time. She is just as guilty for those dead kids as her son.deal with it.

Made it available? He stole the guns and killed her. There's not a state in the Union that would prosecute her even if they COULD prosecute a dead person. It's not like she handed him the gun and then stood there reloading for him.

Can't say for sure anyway else, but it can and has happened here. And the feds can make a case if they wanted to. Adam Lanzas mom is probubly pretty lucky she ain't around to find out, oh, and seeing that she did not properly secure the guns, she would have been the one who should have been held liable monitarily, not the gun companies.

Really? Your state prosecuted someone for being so "irresponsible" as to be murdered and subsequently robbed?

Not as dramatic as all that. A hood rat was taking a nap and two kids were playing with his gun. One shot the other. All this talk about the guns being in a safe, sooo, where did he get the gun to shoot his mom and steal her guns? And if he was crazy, why were they so easy to get to? The mother at a minimum was grossly negligent.

again....he planned this for 2 years........you do not know what he did to get the guns......give me two years and if your guns are locked up I will get them from you.