Scary that Republicans believe Russia over ALL of our US Intelligence Agencies.

[Crixus]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

Name one agency head who has come out and said Trump got elected because of the Russians? Even the first half black president wont say it.

None have.

That's not the issue.

The issue is why so many Republicans are willing to believe a foreigner who was once a KGB agent, and who once said that the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the collapse of the USSR, over agencies who've had thousands of Americans die in defense of our country.

Perhaps the proper question should be then, why is it that most Americans would believe the soviet bear over their elected officials ? And its not just republicans either, and I assume when you say republicans you mean everyone who does not tow the democrat party line. Yall have to remember, The Clintons were not really thought of as honest even by those who voted for her and many in the democrat party really dont even like her. She is the lefts Trump if you will. So keeping that in mind, the leaders of all the alphabet agencies as well as the president (who is on his way out) can only say that Russia said bad things about Hillary, and not so bad things about trump. There is NO evidence Russia gave Julian Assange any hacked material either. None. Zip. Nada. Zero. Zilch. As far as believing a foreigner, it should be more sad that the Americans cant trust their elected officials.

 

[miketx]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

Scary that an idiot like you really thinks the Russians have told us anything. Oh yeah, Putin called me last night and we talked for hours!

 

[miketx]

Trump is running around the country in a ball cap campaigning like the election isn't over.

The man has no idea what being president entails, and even less desire to learn.

Are you man enough to come on here and retract your words should Trump create thousands of jobs, secure or borders, curtail the flow of illegals and return this to a nation of law and order?

Everything the libtard skanks hate.

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

 

[the_human_being]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

 

[the_human_being]

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

 

[jc456]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

 

[jc456]

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

I wish they'd figure out they are personal and there was no hacking of any government server! So how is there a threat?

 

[occupied]

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

Hacks are a crime that is rarely ever detected until after the fact, your man damned sure appreciated all that criminal activity on his behalf though. If he had any honor he would have indicated he didn't want to win like that, oh well.

 

[bripat9643]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

You're whining that Trump is going to do exactly what Obama has done. That's typical for leftwing douche bags.

As for Bush's so-called "intelligence failures," there were no domestic terror attacks in the USA after 9/11. That isn't using weasel words that Obama uses like "no MAJOR terror attacks." I think 50 people getting slaughtered in Obama is pretty major.

 

[bripat9643]

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

Hacks are a crime that is rarely ever detected until after the fact, your man damned sure appreciated all that criminal activity on his behalf though. If he had any honor he would have indicated he didn't want to win like that, oh well.

Why would anyone honest deny the fact that the leaks proved that Hillary and the entire DNC are a bunch of sleazy lying douche bags?

 

[miketx]

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

Hacks are a crime that is rarely ever detected until after the fact, your man damned sure appreciated all that criminal activity on his behalf though. If he had any honor he would have indicated he didn't want to win like that, oh well.

Why would anyone honest deny the fact that leaks proved that Hillary and the entire DNC are a bunch of sleazy lying douche bags?

You have answered your own question. They are not and never will be honest. Never.

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

 

[miketx]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

The sky is falling henny penny.

 

[miketx]

What's the word from Turkey Lurky on this?

 

[the_human_being]

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

Of course he just might replace some of the deadwood with people capable of safeguarding our governmental agencies and actually earn their money.

We already have that, but he does not like what they are saying.

Apparently neither Hillary nor the DNC had their services available to them then.

Hacks are a crime that is rarely ever detected until after the fact, your man damned sure appreciated all that criminal activity on his behalf though. If he had any honor he would have indicated he didn't want to win like that, oh well.

That's probably because no one has yet come forward with any real proof that Russia hacked anything. Even Wikileaks said their source was not the Russians.

 

[the_human_being]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

The sky is falling henny penny.

Is this how you intend to argue policy for the duration of Emperor Trump's presidency?

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.