Scary that Republicans believe Russia over ALL of our US Intelligence Agencies.

[the_human_being]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.

Like I said, you refuse to take responsibility for your own gibberish.

 

[Toro]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

Name one agency head who has come out and said Trump got elected because of the Russians? Even the first half black president wont say it.

None have.

That's not the issue.

The issue is why so many Republicans are willing to believe a foreigner who was once a KGB agent, and who once said that the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the collapse of the USSR, over agencies who've had thousands of Americans die in defense of our country.

Perhaps the proper question should be then, why is it that most Americans would believe the soviet bear over their elected officials ? And its not just republicans either, and I assume when you say republicans you mean everyone who does not tow the democrat party line. Yall have to remember, The Clintons were not really thought of as honest even by those who voted for her and many in the democrat party really dont even like her. She is the lefts Trump if you will. So keeping that in mind, the leaders of all the alphabet agencies as well as the president (who is on his way out) can only say that Russia said bad things about Hillary, and not so bad things about trump. There is NO evidence Russia gave Julian Assange any hacked material either. None. Zip. Nada. Zero. Zilch. As far as believing a foreigner, it should be more sad that the Americans cant trust their elected officials.

Wrong

That's not what the intelligence agencies are saying.

They are saying that based on the nature and motives of the hacking, the Russian government is most likely behind the hacking.

The question is why you and so many other so-called Americans are willing to believe a foreign power who undermines our democracy over American agencies who've had thousands of Americans die?

How fucked up is that?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Toro]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

You're whining that Trump is going to do exactly what Obama has done. That's typical for leftwing douche bags.

As for Bush's so-called "intelligence failures," there were no domestic terror attacks in the USA after 9/11. That isn't using weasel words that Obama uses like "no MAJOR terror attacks." I think 50 people getting slaughtered in Obama is pretty major.

If 9/11 happened under a Democrat, you frauds would be screaming that they were traitors to America.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[occupied]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

Name one agency head who has come out and said Trump got elected because of the Russians? Even the first half black president wont say it.

None have.

That's not the issue.

The issue is why so many Republicans are willing to believe a foreigner who was once a KGB agent, and who once said that the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the collapse of the USSR, over agencies who've had thousands of Americans die in defense of our country.

Perhaps the proper question should be then, why is it that most Americans would believe the soviet bear over their elected officials ? And its not just republicans either, and I assume when you say republicans you mean everyone who does not tow the democrat party line. Yall have to remember, The Clintons were not really thought of as honest even by those who voted for her and many in the democrat party really dont even like her. She is the lefts Trump if you will. So keeping that in mind, the leaders of all the alphabet agencies as well as the president (who is on his way out) can only say that Russia said bad things about Hillary, and not so bad things about trump. There is NO evidence Russia gave Julian Assange any hacked material either. None. Zip. Nada. Zero. Zilch. As far as believing a foreigner, it should be more sad that the Americans cant trust their elected officials.

Wrong

That's not what the intelligence agencies are saying.

They are saying that based on the nature and motives of the hacking, the Russian government is most likely behind the hacking.

The question is why you and so many other so-called Americans are willing to believe a foreign power who undermines our democracy over American agencies who've had thousands of Americans die?

How fucked up is that?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Dangerously, suicidally fucked up. If they think nothing bad can come from Russia that is exactly the direction our enemies will come from.

 

[jc456]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

You need some pain relievers,

 

[jc456]

Not to worry. Trump will create so many jobs these hacks will be able to get jobs as security guards.

No he's not, the terrorists of the world are probably already planning to take full advantage of the chaos Trump is about to unleash on an intelligence community that has shielded us from major attacks since 9/11. Nothing like convenient terrorist attacks to distract from a failed domestic agenda.

Who's failed domestic agenda? Certainly not Trump's because he is not even the President yet. Are you saying someone will launch domestic terrorist attacks in order to distract from Obama and the Democrat's failed domestic policies?

I am saying that someone will launch attacks because Trump is going to attack the intelligence agencies. They have been successful in their mission to prevent large scale attacks by foriegn agents on our soil yet your man has a grudge against them and will make them dangerously useless when he tries to reshape them into an obedient echo chamber. After 9/11 Bush and the republicans took full advantage of their intelligence failures to implement dangerous domestic policy and to distract from flat economic growth and declines in jobs/wages/benefits for American workers. When I see your man lining up the exact same kind of people I cannot help but think we are about to see history repeat itself. I seriously hope I am mistaken but the Trump administration will be even more an MIC puppet than Bushco was.

You're whining that Trump is going to do exactly what Obama has done. That's typical for leftwing douche bags.

As for Bush's so-called "intelligence failures," there were no domestic terror attacks in the USA after 9/11. That isn't using weasel words that Obama uses like "no MAJOR terror attacks." I think 50 people getting slaughtered in Obama is pretty major.

If 9/11 happened under a Democrat, you frauds would be screaming that they were traitors to America.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Huh?

 

[deltex1]

The Russians and many others are up our ass all day, every day, wherever it's important to them. Our cyber offense is # 1...our defense needs work. Another reason Trump was elected.

 

[Correll]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

 

[jc456]

The US has many thousands of intelligence agents that put their lives into danger every single day.
Russia wants the US destroyed. That is no secret.

And now Trump has convinced half of the United States that you can't trust those brave American heroes working in secret to protect our country but you can trust one of the most dangerous regimes that ever existed headed by a dangerous and murderous former KGB agent.

When did this happen? And now the question of GOP loyalty to the United States will forever be in question. Republicans may try to spin and suggest it's Democrats who are dangerous, but it's not Democrats who welcome Nazi's into their party and believe dangerous foreign governments over non partisan Americans who put their lives into danger every day.

Will the Trump Administration go a step further and release the names of covert agents to Russia and other countries that threaten the United States? After all, if he doesn't believe ALL of our intelligence agencies, then what good are they? Maybe he thinks that's the easiest way to get rid of all of them and start over.

Name one agency head who has come out and said Trump got elected because of the Russians? Even the first half black president wont say it.

None have.

That's not the issue.

The issue is why so many Republicans are willing to believe a foreigner who was once a KGB agent, and who once said that the greatest tragedy of the 20th century was the collapse of the USSR, over agencies who've had thousands of Americans die in defense of our country.

Perhaps the proper question should be then, why is it that most Americans would believe the soviet bear over their elected officials ? And its not just republicans either, and I assume when you say republicans you mean everyone who does not tow the democrat party line. Yall have to remember, The Clintons were not really thought of as honest even by those who voted for her and many in the democrat party really dont even like her. She is the lefts Trump if you will. So keeping that in mind, the leaders of all the alphabet agencies as well as the president (who is on his way out) can only say that Russia said bad things about Hillary, and not so bad things about trump. There is NO evidence Russia gave Julian Assange any hacked material either. None. Zip. Nada. Zero. Zilch. As far as believing a foreigner, it should be more sad that the Americans cant trust their elected officials.

Wrong

That's not what the intelligence agencies are saying.

They are saying that based on the nature and motives of the hacking, the Russian government is most likely behind the hacking.

The question is why you and so many other so-called Americans are willing to believe a foreign power who undermines our democracy over American agencies who've had thousands of Americans die?

How fucked up is that?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Dangerously, suicidally fucked up. If they think nothing bad can come from Russia that is exactly the direction our enemies will come from.

Huh?

 

[the_human_being]

This wasn't the Russians:

Breaking: Three States Just Confirmed Suspicions Of Who Hacked Their Election Servers and It's Not Russia

 

[bripat9643]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What's so great about them? Are these the same analysts who failed to warn us about the rise of ISIS? Are they the ones who convinced Obama to help ISIS overthrow Gaddafi? Are the the same ones who convinced us to help the Muslim Brotherhood overthrow Mubarak?

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.

Like I said, you refuse to take responsibility for your own gibberish.

Gibberish? Explain yourself Trumpbot, if you cannot argue policy for your man then it is time to find something else to do with your time. He has expressed deeply troubling opinions of our intelligence agencies and inexplicably favorable opinions of Russia. That shit might somehow make sense to you but to those who actually care about policy there are endless ways that attitude in a President could hurt us badly.

 

[MarcATL]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

We don't have any intelligence analysts and foreign policy experts like that. All of them say exactly what Obama wants them to say.

Logic dictates that when Trump gets in, they'll all say what he wants them to say...yes?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[the_human_being]

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.

Like I said, you refuse to take responsibility for your own gibberish.

Gibberish? Explain yourself Trumpbot, if you cannot argue policy for your man then it is time to find something else to do with your time. He has expressed deeply troubling opinions of our intelligence agencies and inexplicably favorable opinions of Russia. That shit might somehow make sense to you but to those who actually care about policy there are endless ways that attitude in a President could hurt us badly.

Look Nut, if the Department of Homeland Security does not have the expertise to hack into these State voter agencies without leaving a footprint, then the Russians must be a whole lots better at it than our own government is.

 

[occupied]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

You need some pain relievers,

I need nothing more than you people to wise up. If someone had once told me that conservatives would one day trust the dictator of Russia over the CIA I would have laughed in their face, it's just too ridiculous to ever happen.

 

[bripat9643]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

We don't have any intelligence analysts and foreign policy experts like that. All of them say exactly what Obama wants them to say.

Logic dictates that when Trump gets in, they'll all say what he wants them to say...yes?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

So you are admitting that they are now saying what Obama wants them to say?

 

[HenryBHough]

The scary part is that The CIA is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Democrat Party.

Just like the (former) KGB was a sing of The Communist Party.

Note the "former" and look six weeks into America's future......

 

[occupied]

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.

Like I said, you refuse to take responsibility for your own gibberish.

Gibberish? Explain yourself Trumpbot, if you cannot argue policy for your man then it is time to find something else to do with your time. He has expressed deeply troubling opinions of our intelligence agencies and inexplicably favorable opinions of Russia. That shit might somehow make sense to you but to those who actually care about policy there are endless ways that attitude in a President could hurt us badly.

Look Nut, if the Department of Homeland Security does not have the expertise to hack into these State voter agencies without leaving a footprint, then the Russians must be a whole lots better at it than our own government is.

All hacks leave evidence, if you care to go looking for it. Your man is never going to look for it.

 

[bripat9643]

The Scary thing is that we are about to lose a bunch of intelligence analysts and foriegn policy experts who will simply refuse to work for agencies who will now be required to tell the president exactly what he wants to hear rather than the reality of threats we face.

That's different from today how?

We are about to lose the greatest collection of intelligence analysts this country has ever seen to political jury-rigging, bound to be some negative fallout from that. There is a very good chance we are going to be blindsided if Trump puts blinders on national intelligence.

You need some pain relievers,

I need nothing more than you people to wise up. If someone had once told me that conservatives would one day trust the dictator of Russia over the CIA I would have laughed in their face, it's just too ridiculous to ever happen.

This seems to be the latest Hillary and Obama meme: anyone who questions the credibility of their fake news about the Russians hacking the election is a traitor.

You can't get any sleazier than that.

America thanks you all for being the utter douche bags that you are so proud to be.

 

[the_human_being]

What would Liberals do without words such as "if", "may", "might", "suppose"?

Everyone indulges in speculation about the future like the way you were certain that Obama was going to seize power, take away your guns and impose some weird kind of Black Sharia socialism on America and have all the white people picking cotton.

Like I said, you refuse to take responsibility for your own gibberish.

Gibberish? Explain yourself Trumpbot, if you cannot argue policy for your man then it is time to find something else to do with your time. He has expressed deeply troubling opinions of our intelligence agencies and inexplicably favorable opinions of Russia. That shit might somehow make sense to you but to those who actually care about policy there are endless ways that attitude in a President could hurt us badly.

Look Nut, if the Department of Homeland Security does not have the expertise to hack into these State voter agencies without leaving a footprint, then the Russians must be a whole lots better at it than our own government is.

All hacks leave evidence, if you care to go looking for it. Your man is never going to look for it.

More unqualified predictions from the Left Wing Nut.