School has brutal reply after Muslim issues threat over daughters lunch

[Syriusly]

Read the statutes you ignorant fuck, saying "watch your back," is not against the law, the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim and Muslim children are no different than Hitler youth they need to be taken from their death cult pedophile worshipping parents and deprogrammed.

Another lie since, like you lied before, I never said it was a "terroristic" threat nor "against the law". I simply said it was a threat, which it is.

The only good Muslim is a dead Muslim you can join them along with your fellow traitors to western civilization like that whore Jo Cox, Je Suis Breivik watch your fucking back bitch.

Awesome. Thanks for the threat of violence. I look forward to seeing you in the news just like this fucking nutjob:

Jewish Site Killings: Jury Recommends Death for Frazier Glenn Miller Jr.

Who here thinks Glenn should have had the balls to blow his own head off after murdering three innocent Christians he thought were Jews? One was a woman, Terri LaManno, and the other was a child, Reat Griffin Underwood along with Reat's grandfather.

A real threat of violence- but of course done anonymously and cowardly.

All traitors who opened the gates to the Islamic Imperialist invaders can join them on the chopping blocks just like that treasonous whore Jo Cox. Je Suis Breivik!

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

 

[Syriusly]

....From the testimony of SS-Gruppenführer Otto Ohlendorf head of Einsatzgruppen D outlining the rear actions of the Einsatzagruppen regarding the intentional murder of ethnic Jews in the East based on their blood including the women and children:


Q. What were these orders?

A. These orders had as their purpose to make it as easy as possible for the unfortunate victim and to prevent the brutality of the men from leading to inevitable excesses. Thus I first ordered that only so many victims should be brought to the place of execution as the execution commandos could handle. Any individual action by any individual man was forbidden. The Einsatzkommandos shot in a military manner only upon orders. It was strictly ordered to avoid any maltreatment, undressing was not permitted. The taking of any personal possessions was not permitted. Publicity was not permitted, and at the very moment when it was noted that a man had experienced joy in carrying out these executions, it was ordered that this man should never participate in any more executions. The men could not report voluntarily, they were ordered.
Q. Why did you not prevent the liquidations?

A. Even if I use the most severe standard in judging this, I had as little possibility as any of the codefendants here to prevent this order. There was only one thing, a senseless martyrdom through suicide, senseless because this would not have changed anything in the execution of this order, for this order was not an order of the SS, it was an order of the Supreme Commander in Chief and the Chief of State; it was not only carried out by Himmler or Heydrich. The army had to carry it out too, the High Command of the Army as well as the commanders in the east and southeast who were the superior commanders for the Einsatzgruppen and Einsatzkommandos. If I could imagine a theoretical possibility, then there was only the refusal on the part of those persons who were in the uppermost hierarchy and could appeal to the Supreme Commander and Chief of State, because they had the only possibility of getting access to him. They were, after all, the highest bearers of responsibility in the theater of operations.

Q. Did you not try in Nikolaev to dissuade the Reich Leader SS from this order?

A. The situation in Nikolaev was especially depressing in a moral sense, because in agreement with the army, we had excluded a large number of Jews, the farmers, from the executions. When the Reich Leader SS was in Nikolaev on 4 or 5 October, I was reproached for this measure and he ordered that henceforth, even against the will of the army, the executions should take place as planned. When the Reich Leader SS arrived at my headquarters, I had assembled all available commanders of my Einsatzgruppe. The Reich Leader addressed these men and repeated the strict order to kill all those groups which I have designated. He added that he alone would carry the responsibility, as far as accounting to the Fuehrer was concerned. None of the men would bear any responsibility, but he demanded the execution of this order, even though he knew how harsh these measures were. Nevertheless, after supper, I spoke to the Reich Leader and I pointed out the inhuman burden which was being imposed on the men in killing all these civilians. I didn't even get an answer.

Q. Now, I cannot pronounce it correctly, the Karaims were another sect whom you encountered in the south of Russia, and this sect had no Jewish blood, but it did share the religious confessions of the Jews. Is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. You submitted to Berlin the question whether the Karaims should be killed, and I understood you to say that the order you got from Berlin was you shall not kill them for they have nothing in common with the Jews except the confession?

A. Yes.

Q. Will you explain to the Court, please, what difference there was between the Karaims and the Krimchaks, except Jewish blood ?

A. I understand your question completely in reference to the eastern Jews, in the case of the Jews who were found in the eastern campaign. These Jews were to be killed-according to the order-for the reason that they were considered carriers of bolshevism, and, therefore, considered as endangering the security of the German Reich. This concerned the Jews who were found in Russia, and it was not known to me that the Jews in all of Europe were being killed, but on the contrary I knew that down to my dismissal these Jews were not killed, but it was attempted at all costs to get them to emigrate. The fact that the Karaims were not killed showed that the charge of the prosecution that persons were persecuted for their religion is not correct, for the Karaims had that Jewish religion, but they could not be killed because they did not belong to the Jewish race.

Q. I think, Witness, you answered exactly what I had antici-

*Sect which refused the Talmud and adopted the Old Testament as sole source of faith.
**Turkish Jews of mixed Semitic and Tartaric blood.

Page 275

pated in the last sentence, "They did not belong to the JewishRace," is that right?

A. Yes, That is right.

Q. They were found in Russia?

A. Yes.

Q. But they participated in the Jewish confession in Russia?

A. The Karaims had the Jewish faith, yes.

Q. But your race authorities in Berlin could find no trace of Jewish blood in them?

A. Yes.

Q. So they came absolutely under the Fuehrer Decree or the Streckenbach Order to kill all Jews?

A. Yes.

Q. Because of blood?

A. Because they were of Jewish origin. For you must understand the Nazi ideology, as you call it. It was the opinion of the Fuehrer that in Russia and in bolshevism, the representatives of this blood showed themselves especially suitable for this idea, therefore, the carriers of this blood became especially suitable representatives of the bolshevism. That is not on account of their faith, or their religion, but because of their human make-up and character.

Q. And because of their blood, right?

A. I cannot express it any more definitely than I stated, from their nature and their characteristics. Their blood, of course, has something to do with it, according to National Socialist ideology.

Q. Let's see, if I can understand it; we've got a lot of time, I hope. What was the distinction except blood?

A. Between whom?

B. Between the Karaims and the Krimchaks?

A. The difference of the blood, yes.

Q. Only the difference in blood, is that so?

A. Yes.

Q. So the criterion and the test which you applied in your slaughter was blood?

A. The criteria which I used were the orders which I got, and it has not been doubted during the entire trial, that in this
Fuehrer Order the Jews were designated as the ones who belonged to that circle in Russia and who were to be killed.

Q. Tell us how orders that you operated under in 1941 in Russia differed from the order which controlled killing of Jews in Poland in 1939 ?

A. In Poland individual actions had been ordered, while in Russia, during the entire time of the commitment, the killing of all Jews had been ordered. Special actions in Poland had been ordered, whose contents I do not know in detail.

COL. AMEN: Were all victims, including the men, women, and children executed in the same manner?

OHLENDORF: Until the spring of 1942, yes. Then an order came from Himmler that in the future women and children were to be killed only in gas vans.

COL. AMEN: How had women and children been killed previously?

OHLENDORF: In the same was as the men - by shooting.

COL. POKROVSKY: You said that mostly women and children were executed in these vans. For what reason?

OHLENDORF: That was a special order from Himmler to the effect that women and children were not to be exposed to the mental strain of the executions; and thus the men of the kommandos, mostly married men, should not be compelled to aim at women and children.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): In your testimony you said that the Einsatz group had the object of annihilating the Jews and the commissars, is that correct?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): And in what category did you consider the children? For what reason were the children massacred?

OHLENDORF: The order was that the Jewish population should be totally exterminated.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): Including the children?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): Were all the Jewish children murdered?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/Einsatz2c.htm
Ohlentestimony

The hanging of Nazi scumbags like Otto Ohlendorf ridded the world of their evil.

The point dipshit is that it had nothing to do with the Jewish ideology which is why non-ethnic Jews were not targeted but Jews were targeted specifically because of their blood.

You sound very much like the Nazis- with your attempts at legal distinctions for rationalizations why some people are okay to be murdered by you.

I'm not the one defending an anti-Semitic hate group,

You are the anti-semite promoting hate- because of course- Muslim arabs are semites......

 

[Syriusly]

Just like Hitler believed there were no "German Jews".......

Your comparison of Muslims to Jews is false, .

My comparison is spot on- Hitler told the German people that German Jews were not Germans.

Picaro and his fellow travellers tell the American people that American Muslims are not Americans

Members of the Ummah are foreign invaders .

How very Hitlerian of you- you fascists love to piss on the Constitution.

Islam poses a clear and probable danger to the security of the United States it is not protected by the Constitution.

How very Hitlerian of you- you fascists love to piss on the Constitution.

Different religion- same fascists.

 

[Picaro]

So what was the threat dumb ass, or is that just more stuff you made up like usual?

law suit dumbass

So exercising her legal right to sue is considered a threat?

Yes, it is: I've sued two lawyers for threatening to sue me, and then didn't follow it up. And I won both cases.

 

[Picaro]

And no- its not a 'false equivalency'- it is a valid equivalency- but you made a very good point and put that equivalency into perspective.

I am tempted to start a thread titled "The Religion of Peace?"- from a Jewish perspective in the 14th century.

.

lol go ahead, dumbass. It would be funny laughing at you getting your ass handed to you yet again. You're so easy; that's because you're completely ignorant of history, and certainly of Jewish history.

LOL

Being called ignorant by you is like being called a racist by the head of the KKK......its an honor.

I may- depends if I have time. The 14th and 15th Century were fascinating centuries in Europe.

I'm sure you imagine yourself as having 'won' all kinds of 'honors', and it might fun to read your fake news from other centuries, given how ridiculous your perceptions of current events are.

 

[BULLDOG]

So what was the threat dumb ass, or is that just more stuff you made up like usual?

law suit dumbass

So exercising her legal right to sue is considered a threat?

Yes, it is: I've sued two lawyers for threatening to sue me, and then didn't follow it up. And I won both cases.

No you didn't, except in your mind. Why do you altRight/teabagger/RWNJ types have to lie about everything?

 

[Mudda]

The bottom meme says it all for those who know this is America. Don't try and change our Country or our ways into your ways. If your ways are so great wth did you leave your country for.

So eating pork is the American way? If you ask me, all meats whether its pork or beef should be banned from schools. Its cancer causing and heart disease causing, but that's another topic for another day.

This mother wasn't asking for all students to be barred from eating pork. She was simply asking her own child not be fed it. The child is 7 years old. She still needs guidance on what to eat.

I agree the mother should just pack a lunch, but this notion that asking your not be fed pork is ridiculous.

Do you find it ridiculous when Jewish people ask for kosher options?

That Muslim mother should be told not to push her daughter into a barbaric and misogynistic religion.

And then deported.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

Mental illness isn't protected by the constitution. The mother must be sick in the head to want her daughter to be part of sharia.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

When you bend down to kiss the carpet at the mosque, does it smell like dirty feet? Because Muslims weren't the ones who invented soap.

 

[Picaro]

So what was the threat dumb ass, or is that just more stuff you made up like usual?

law suit dumbass

So exercising her legal right to sue is considered a threat?

Yes, it is: I've sued two lawyers for threatening to sue me, and then didn't follow it up. And I won both cases.

No you didn't, except in your mind. Why do you altRight/teabagger/RWNJ types have to lie about everything?

Call one and ask. In many cases it falls under 'attempted coercion and intimidation' as a tactic.

 

[Mudda]

What would you do with the American Muslims like myself?

there are no 'American' Muslims; Muslims are only loyal to the Umma and the future 'Caliphate'. They aren't Muslims if they aren't. Thomas Jefferson, the libertarian and the founder of what became of the Democratic Party, expressed the proper way to handle fake 'citizens', native or immigrants, didn't matter to him either way ...


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

-Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

So, all real Democrats would be all for deporting fake 'citizens', and those who support Obama or Hillary and their criminal syndicate should be happy to leave on their own, if they truly had any principles of any kind.

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

That Muslim mother should be told not to push her daughter into a barbaric and misogynistic religion.

And then deported.

Well that's your opinion and youre entitled to it. But this is America and people are free to raise their children on what religion or belief system they want.

Islam is a mental illness masquerading as a religion. In this case you could add child abuse by subjecting a child to the monstrosity that is sharia. People should wake up!

And again- that is your opinion- but in America- all Americans freedom of worship is protected- that includes Christians, Jews, and yes- Muslims.

Clear and probable dangers are not protected by the 1st amendment you dumb fuck.

LOL- does your momma know you have such a filthy mouth? She might take away your wifi privelages.

The First Amendment protects the rights of all Americans from Fascists like you.

Just curious, if we're fascists, what are ISIS?

 

[BULLDOG]

So what was the threat dumb ass, or is that just more stuff you made up like usual?

law suit dumbass

So exercising her legal right to sue is considered a threat?

Yes, it is: I've sued two lawyers for threatening to sue me, and then didn't follow it up. And I won both cases.

No you didn't, except in your mind. Why do you altRight/teabagger/RWNJ types have to lie about everything?

Call one and ask.

I'm asking you.

 

[Syriusly]

What would you do with the American Muslims like myself?

there are no 'American' Muslims; Muslims are only loyal to the Umma and the future 'Caliphate'. They aren't Muslims if they aren't. Thomas Jefferson, the libertarian and the founder of what became of the Democratic Party, expressed the proper way to handle fake 'citizens', native or immigrants, didn't matter to him either way ...


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

-Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

So, all real Democrats would be all for deporting fake 'citizens', and those who support Obama or Hillary and their criminal syndicate should be happy to leave on their own, if they truly had any principles of any kind.

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Well that's your opinion and youre entitled to it. But this is America and people are free to raise their children on what religion or belief system they want.

Islam is a mental illness masquerading as a religion. In this case you could add child abuse by subjecting a child to the monstrosity that is sharia. People should wake up!

And again- that is your opinion- but in America- all Americans freedom of worship is protected- that includes Christians, Jews, and yes- Muslims.

Clear and probable dangers are not protected by the 1st amendment you dumb fuck.

LOL- does your momma know you have such a filthy mouth? She might take away your wifi privelages.

The First Amendment protects the rights of all Americans from Fascists like you.

Just curious, if we're fascists, what are ISIS?

Your kissing cousins.

ISIS are murderous 'fascist' assholes who want a war between all Muslims- with ISIS in charge- and the West.

You are playing your part in promoting the ISIS agenda.

 

[Syriusly]

So eating pork is the American way? If you ask me, all meats whether its pork or beef should be banned from schools. Its cancer causing and heart disease causing, but that's another topic for another day.

This mother wasn't asking for all students to be barred from eating pork. She was simply asking her own child not be fed it. The child is 7 years old. She still needs guidance on what to eat.

I agree the mother should just pack a lunch, but this notion that asking your not be fed pork is ridiculous.

Do you find it ridiculous when Jewish people ask for kosher options?

That Muslim mother should be told not to push her daughter into a barbaric and misogynistic religion.

And then deported.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

Mental illness isn't protected by the constitution. The mother must be sick in the head to want her daughter to be part of sharia.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

When you bend down to kiss the carpet at the mosque, does it smell like dirty feet? Because Muslims weren't the ones who invented soap.

LOL.....I have never gone to a mosque. But hey interesting tidbit there- Muslims didn't invent soap.....of course neither did Christians or Jews......

 

[Syriusly]

And no- its not a 'false equivalency'- it is a valid equivalency- but you made a very good point and put that equivalency into perspective.

I am tempted to start a thread titled "The Religion of Peace?"- from a Jewish perspective in the 14th century.

.

lol go ahead, dumbass. It would be funny laughing at you getting your ass handed to you yet again. You're so easy; that's because you're completely ignorant of history, and certainly of Jewish history.

LOL

Being called ignorant by you is like being called a racist by the head of the KKK......its an honor.

I may- depends if I have time. The 14th and 15th Century were fascinating centuries in Europe.

I'm sure you imagine .

I'm sure you spend lots of time imagining what I am thinking.

Let me get back to your anti-religious USMB pogrom.

 

[Syriusly]

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

Wrong in several ways. First, Christian theology is not about politics, a.

In 1960 Christian Conservatives warned that electing John F. Kennedy would make the Pope in control of the United States- since- again according to Christian Conservatives- Catholics were obligated by their religion to put the Pope ahead of their religion.

In 1960- Christians were all involved in politics- both Catholics- and Protestants- because of theology.

John F. Kennedy and Religion - John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum
In September, a group of 150 Protestant ministers met in Washington and declared that Kennedy could not remain independent of Church control unless he specifically repudiated its teachings.

Sounds eerily like todays anti-Muslims

Pipe down, moron, and quit spamming the thread with your ignorant fake news. Some adults are having a discussion, so go play with the other left wing kids at the Pedo-Pavillion.

You fascists always are trying to yell down anyone who you don't agree with.

 

[Mudda]

there are no 'American' Muslims; Muslims are only loyal to the Umma and the future 'Caliphate'. They aren't Muslims if they aren't. Thomas Jefferson, the libertarian and the founder of what became of the Democratic Party, expressed the proper way to handle fake 'citizens', native or immigrants, didn't matter to him either way ...


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

-Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

So, all real Democrats would be all for deporting fake 'citizens', and those who support Obama or Hillary and their criminal syndicate should be happy to leave on their own, if they truly had any principles of any kind.

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Islam is a mental illness masquerading as a religion. In this case you could add child abuse by subjecting a child to the monstrosity that is sharia. People should wake up!

And again- that is your opinion- but in America- all Americans freedom of worship is protected- that includes Christians, Jews, and yes- Muslims.

Clear and probable dangers are not protected by the 1st amendment you dumb fuck.

LOL- does your momma know you have such a filthy mouth? She might take away your wifi privelages.

The First Amendment protects the rights of all Americans from Fascists like you.

Just curious, if we're fascists, what are ISIS?

Your kissing cousins.

ISIS are murderous 'fascist' assholes who want a war between all Muslims- with ISIS in charge- and the West.

You are playing your part in promoting the ISIS agenda.

I don't mind Muslim killing Muslim. It's all good.

 

[Mudda]

That Muslim mother should be told not to push her daughter into a barbaric and misogynistic religion.

And then deported.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

Mental illness isn't protected by the constitution. The mother must be sick in the head to want her daughter to be part of sharia.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

When you bend down to kiss the carpet at the mosque, does it smell like dirty feet? Because Muslims weren't the ones who invented soap.

LOL.....I have never gone to a mosque. But hey interesting tidbit there- Muslims didn't invent soap.....of course neither did Christians or Jews......

I am in none of those delusional sects. I'll leave believing in invisible people to you.

 

[Syriusly]

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

Mental illness isn't protected by the constitution. The mother must be sick in the head to want her daughter to be part of sharia.

You fascists do like to advocate pissing on the American constitution.

When you bend down to kiss the carpet at the mosque, does it smell like dirty feet? Because Muslims weren't the ones who invented soap.

LOL.....I have never gone to a mosque. But hey interesting tidbit there- Muslims didn't invent soap.....of course neither did Christians or Jews......

I am in none of those delusional sects. I'll leave believing in invisible people to you.

LOL- I don't believe in any of those delusional sects either.

I also don't spend my time attacking those sects for their delusions.

 

[Syriusly]

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

And again- that is your opinion- but in America- all Americans freedom of worship is protected- that includes Christians, Jews, and yes- Muslims.

Clear and probable dangers are not protected by the 1st amendment you dumb fuck.

LOL- does your momma know you have such a filthy mouth? She might take away your wifi privelages.

The First Amendment protects the rights of all Americans from Fascists like you.

Just curious, if we're fascists, what are ISIS?

Your kissing cousins.

ISIS are murderous 'fascist' assholes who want a war between all Muslims- with ISIS in charge- and the West.

You are playing your part in promoting the ISIS agenda.

I don't mind Muslim killing Muslim. It's all good.

Of course you don't.

Assholes like you are fine with people killing babies- as long as they are Muslim babies.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

What would you do with the American Muslims like myself?

there are no 'American' Muslims; Muslims are only loyal to the Umma and the future 'Caliphate'. They aren't Muslims if they aren't. Thomas Jefferson, the libertarian and the founder of what became of the Democratic Party, expressed the proper way to handle fake 'citizens', native or immigrants, didn't matter to him either way ...


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

-Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

So, all real Democrats would be all for deporting fake 'citizens', and those who support Obama or Hillary and their criminal syndicate should be happy to leave on their own, if they truly had any principles of any kind.

Likewise, all Christians put Jesus before country, therefore, like Muslims, cannot be true Christians if they put being an American first.

21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

That Muslim mother should be told not to push her daughter into a barbaric and misogynistic religion.

And then deported.

Well that's your opinion and youre entitled to it. But this is America and people are free to raise their children on what religion or belief system they want.

Islam is a mental illness masquerading as a religion. In this case you could add child abuse by subjecting a child to the monstrosity that is sharia. People should wake up!

And again- that is your opinion- but in America- all Americans freedom of worship is protected- that includes Christians, Jews, and yes- Muslims.

Clear and probable dangers are not protected by the 1st amendment you dumb fuck.

LOL- does your momma know you have such a filthy mouth? She might take away your wifi privelages.

The First Amendment protects the rights of all Americans from Fascists like you.

The first amendment does not apply to clear and probable dangers to the security of the United States which Islam through its mandates to slay the infidel and destroy all secular forms of government and replace them with Islamic theocracies, clearly does.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact you ignorant little faggot.

And again you call me a fascist but I'm not the one defending an anti-Semitic hate group, that would be you in your defense of Islam under which 90%+ of members are anti-Semitic and whose texts command the death of Jews and whose founder perpetrated genocide, ethnic cleansing, and enslavement of the Jewish banu tribes of the Arabian peninsula.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

....From the testimony of SS-Gruppenführer Otto Ohlendorf head of Einsatzgruppen D outlining the rear actions of the Einsatzagruppen regarding the intentional murder of ethnic Jews in the East based on their blood including the women and children:


Q. What were these orders?

A. These orders had as their purpose to make it as easy as possible for the unfortunate victim and to prevent the brutality of the men from leading to inevitable excesses. Thus I first ordered that only so many victims should be brought to the place of execution as the execution commandos could handle. Any individual action by any individual man was forbidden. The Einsatzkommandos shot in a military manner only upon orders. It was strictly ordered to avoid any maltreatment, undressing was not permitted. The taking of any personal possessions was not permitted. Publicity was not permitted, and at the very moment when it was noted that a man had experienced joy in carrying out these executions, it was ordered that this man should never participate in any more executions. The men could not report voluntarily, they were ordered.
Q. Why did you not prevent the liquidations?

A. Even if I use the most severe standard in judging this, I had as little possibility as any of the codefendants here to prevent this order. There was only one thing, a senseless martyrdom through suicide, senseless because this would not have changed anything in the execution of this order, for this order was not an order of the SS, it was an order of the Supreme Commander in Chief and the Chief of State; it was not only carried out by Himmler or Heydrich. The army had to carry it out too, the High Command of the Army as well as the commanders in the east and southeast who were the superior commanders for the Einsatzgruppen and Einsatzkommandos. If I could imagine a theoretical possibility, then there was only the refusal on the part of those persons who were in the uppermost hierarchy and could appeal to the Supreme Commander and Chief of State, because they had the only possibility of getting access to him. They were, after all, the highest bearers of responsibility in the theater of operations.

Q. Did you not try in Nikolaev to dissuade the Reich Leader SS from this order?

A. The situation in Nikolaev was especially depressing in a moral sense, because in agreement with the army, we had excluded a large number of Jews, the farmers, from the executions. When the Reich Leader SS was in Nikolaev on 4 or 5 October, I was reproached for this measure and he ordered that henceforth, even against the will of the army, the executions should take place as planned. When the Reich Leader SS arrived at my headquarters, I had assembled all available commanders of my Einsatzgruppe. The Reich Leader addressed these men and repeated the strict order to kill all those groups which I have designated. He added that he alone would carry the responsibility, as far as accounting to the Fuehrer was concerned. None of the men would bear any responsibility, but he demanded the execution of this order, even though he knew how harsh these measures were. Nevertheless, after supper, I spoke to the Reich Leader and I pointed out the inhuman burden which was being imposed on the men in killing all these civilians. I didn't even get an answer.

Q. Now, I cannot pronounce it correctly, the Karaims were another sect whom you encountered in the south of Russia, and this sect had no Jewish blood, but it did share the religious confessions of the Jews. Is that right?

A. Yes.

Q. You submitted to Berlin the question whether the Karaims should be killed, and I understood you to say that the order you got from Berlin was you shall not kill them for they have nothing in common with the Jews except the confession?

A. Yes.

Q. Will you explain to the Court, please, what difference there was between the Karaims and the Krimchaks, except Jewish blood ?

A. I understand your question completely in reference to the eastern Jews, in the case of the Jews who were found in the eastern campaign. These Jews were to be killed-according to the order-for the reason that they were considered carriers of bolshevism, and, therefore, considered as endangering the security of the German Reich. This concerned the Jews who were found in Russia, and it was not known to me that the Jews in all of Europe were being killed, but on the contrary I knew that down to my dismissal these Jews were not killed, but it was attempted at all costs to get them to emigrate. The fact that the Karaims were not killed showed that the charge of the prosecution that persons were persecuted for their religion is not correct, for the Karaims had that Jewish religion, but they could not be killed because they did not belong to the Jewish race.

Q. I think, Witness, you answered exactly what I had antici-

*Sect which refused the Talmud and adopted the Old Testament as sole source of faith.
**Turkish Jews of mixed Semitic and Tartaric blood.

Page 275

pated in the last sentence, "They did not belong to the JewishRace," is that right?

A. Yes, That is right.

Q. They were found in Russia?

A. Yes.

Q. But they participated in the Jewish confession in Russia?

A. The Karaims had the Jewish faith, yes.

Q. But your race authorities in Berlin could find no trace of Jewish blood in them?

A. Yes.

Q. So they came absolutely under the Fuehrer Decree or the Streckenbach Order to kill all Jews?

A. Yes.

Q. Because of blood?

A. Because they were of Jewish origin. For you must understand the Nazi ideology, as you call it. It was the opinion of the Fuehrer that in Russia and in bolshevism, the representatives of this blood showed themselves especially suitable for this idea, therefore, the carriers of this blood became especially suitable representatives of the bolshevism. That is not on account of their faith, or their religion, but because of their human make-up and character.

Q. And because of their blood, right?

A. I cannot express it any more definitely than I stated, from their nature and their characteristics. Their blood, of course, has something to do with it, according to National Socialist ideology.

Q. Let's see, if I can understand it; we've got a lot of time, I hope. What was the distinction except blood?

A. Between whom?

B. Between the Karaims and the Krimchaks?

A. The difference of the blood, yes.

Q. Only the difference in blood, is that so?

A. Yes.

Q. So the criterion and the test which you applied in your slaughter was blood?

A. The criteria which I used were the orders which I got, and it has not been doubted during the entire trial, that in this
Fuehrer Order the Jews were designated as the ones who belonged to that circle in Russia and who were to be killed.

Q. Tell us how orders that you operated under in 1941 in Russia differed from the order which controlled killing of Jews in Poland in 1939 ?

A. In Poland individual actions had been ordered, while in Russia, during the entire time of the commitment, the killing of all Jews had been ordered. Special actions in Poland had been ordered, whose contents I do not know in detail.

COL. AMEN: Were all victims, including the men, women, and children executed in the same manner?

OHLENDORF: Until the spring of 1942, yes. Then an order came from Himmler that in the future women and children were to be killed only in gas vans.

COL. AMEN: How had women and children been killed previously?

OHLENDORF: In the same was as the men - by shooting.

COL. POKROVSKY: You said that mostly women and children were executed in these vans. For what reason?

OHLENDORF: That was a special order from Himmler to the effect that women and children were not to be exposed to the mental strain of the executions; and thus the men of the kommandos, mostly married men, should not be compelled to aim at women and children.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): In your testimony you said that the Einsatz group had the object of annihilating the Jews and the commissars, is that correct?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): And in what category did you consider the children? For what reason were the children massacred?

OHLENDORF: The order was that the Jewish population should be totally exterminated.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): Including the children?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

THE TRIBUNAL (Gen. Niktchenko): Were all the Jewish children murdered?

OHLENDORF: Yes.

http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/Einsatz2c.htm
Ohlentestimony

The hanging of Nazi scumbags like Otto Ohlendorf ridded the world of their evil.

The point dipshit is that it had nothing to do with the Jewish ideology which is why non-ethnic Jews were not targeted but Jews were targeted specifically because of their blood.

You sound very much like the Nazis- with your attempts at legal distinctions for rationalizations why some people are okay to be murdered by you.

I'm not the one defending an anti-Semitic hate group,

You are the anti-semite promoting hate- because of course- Muslim arabs are semites......

A) not all Muslims are Arabs.

B) not all Arabs are Muslims.

C) the term "anti-Semitic," was coined specifically and exclusively to refer to the hatred of Jews and does not, nor has it ever referred to the hatred of the Semitic linguistic classification.

D) according to the PEW Global Attitudes Survey it is more than 90% of the global Muslim population that hates Jews.

E) it is you sir who are the Nazi, there is no other possible reason why you would support the invasion of western civilization by the Islamic Imperialists who promote not only virulent anti-Semitism but homophobia, misogyny, and theocracy as well (again we are talking about 90%+ of the worlds Muslims not radical fringe groups) you sir are an ardent supporter of the largest hate group in the history of the planet you sick fuck.