Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[MeBelle]

And 'they' still haven't found squat on Trump.
Even after three years of trying.


lmao

Several of trump's 'associates' in prison and one awaiting sentencing. That should tell you something.

It does tell me something.

It doesn't have anything to do with the House of Reps (Democrat) hardon to impeach Trump.

 

[M14 Shooter]

President's asking for investigations into their political opponents is a-okay with you?

Why do you believe than someone running against an incumbent White House is immune to federal investigation of actions he took while he was a elected federal official?

Where did I say that?

Oh, so you agree - the federal government CAN investigate Joe Biden for actions he took while an elected federal official, even though he is running for office.
And yet, you think Trump should be impeached for instigating that very thing.

Of course the government can investigate Joe Biden

You agree that the federal government CAN investigate Joe Biden for actions he took while an elected federal official, even though he is running for office, and yet you take exception to the President asking for an investigation into the actions Joe Biden took while an elected federal official, because he is running for office - to the point where you believe it is an impeachable offense

 

[jasonnfree]

Whatever information Trump has been hiding from the House.

giddy-up

Trump didn't 'hide' anything from the House.

Or do you mean the 'testimony' behind closed doors the House Dems hid from the public??

Trump has refused all requests at documents and witnesses. I can’t believe you aren’t aware of that.

THAT is not an impeachable offense! If you on the left feel that Trump is improperly invoking Executive Privilege then you should be taking that to the courts for a decision. You haven't done that however because you're SO desperate to come up with something you can impeach Trump on...and you've failed so epically to find something that you're reduced to claiming "obstruction of justice" because Trump isn't cooperating with your mock trial in the House!

This isn't about impeachable offenses! It never was. It's about impeaching Trump no matter what he's done or not done! It's why you're bringing impeachment articles

against him for doing something that Barack Obama did as well.

Republicans would have been all over Obama had he done one tenth of the crap trump has done.

 

[M14 Shooter]

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

What happened to the obstruction and collusion proven by Mueller Report?

“This is a president who has violated the law 6 ways from Sunday,” said the committee’s chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. He argued that Mueller’s report lays out “very substantial evidence” that Trump is guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” the constitutional standard for impeachment.
Mueller Hearing to Air Evidence of Trump Wrongdoing

Didn't have enough support in the House. It's a shame.

Why not?

The popular wisdom is that people didn't understand the allegations or didn't see attempted obstruction as enough of a crime. It's a fair point.

And so, after more than two years of hype from the Democrats and their servants in the MSM, the Democrats ditched the ENTIRE Mueller report and hung their political future on a phone call to the President of the Ukraine - with the useful idiots lined up all in a row to support them


How do you people remember to breathe?

 

[colfax_m]

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

What happened to the obstruction and collusion proven by Mueller Report?

“This is a president who has violated the law 6 ways from Sunday,” said the committee’s chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. He argued that Mueller’s report lays out “very substantial evidence” that Trump is guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” the constitutional standard for impeachment.
Mueller Hearing to Air Evidence of Trump Wrongdoing

Didn't have enough support in the House. It's a shame.

Why not?

The popular wisdom is that people didn't understand the allegations or didn't see attempted obstruction as enough of a crime. It's a fair point.

And so, after more than two years of hype from the Democrats and their servants in the MSM, the Democrats ditched the ENTIRE Mueller report and hung their political future on a phone call to the President of the Ukraine - with the useful idiots lined up all in a row to support them


How do you people remember to breathe?

It has the benefit of being easier to understand. Trump was holding out taxpayer dollars to get a foreign government to harm his opponent.

Easy peasy. Even for the 5th avenue supporters out there.

 

[M14 Shooter]

What happened to the obstruction and collusion proven by Mueller Report?

“This is a president who has violated the law 6 ways from Sunday,” said the committee’s chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. He argued that Mueller’s report lays out “very substantial evidence” that Trump is guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” the constitutional standard for impeachment.
Mueller Hearing to Air Evidence of Trump Wrongdoing

Didn't have enough support in the House. It's a shame.

Why not?

The popular wisdom is that people didn't understand the allegations or didn't see attempted obstruction as enough of a crime. It's a fair point.

And so, after more than two years of hype from the Democrats and their servants in the MSM, the Democrats ditched the ENTIRE Mueller report and hung their political future on a phone call to the President of the Ukraine - with the useful idiots lined up all in a row to support them

How do you people remember to breathe?

It has the benefit of being easier to understand. Trump was holding out taxpayer dollars to get a foreign government to harm his opponent.

That's the current lie, yes.

The "investigating a political opponent" line currently used by you people is nothing but desperate spin, as you all agree a political opponent of an incumbent white house is not immune from investigation.

 

[Nostra]

Didn't have enough support in the House. It's a shame.

Why not?

The popular wisdom is that people didn't understand the allegations or didn't see attempted obstruction as enough of a crime. It's a fair point.

And so, after more than two years of hype from the Democrats and their servants in the MSM, the Democrats ditched the ENTIRE Mueller report and hung their political future on a phone call to the President of the Ukraine - with the useful idiots lined up all in a row to support them

How do you people remember to breathe?

It has the benefit of being easier to understand. Trump was holding out taxpayer dollars to get a foreign government to harm his opponent.

That's the current lie, yes.

Impeachment is aimed at the Dimwinger base..........and Colfax is admitting they are too fucking stupid to understand "bribery", "collusion" and "obstruction".

That is his explanation as to why none of that is in the articles of impeachment. A sad commentary on his fellow travelers, but accurate on the assessment that the Dimwinger base is made up of blithering idiots.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Why not?

The popular wisdom is that people didn't understand the allegations or didn't see attempted obstruction as enough of a crime. It's a fair point.

And so, after more than two years of hype from the Democrats and their servants in the MSM, the Democrats ditched the ENTIRE Mueller report and hung their political future on a phone call to the President of the Ukraine - with the useful idiots lined up all in a row to support them

How do you people remember to breathe?

It has the benefit of being easier to understand. Trump was holding out taxpayer dollars to get a foreign government to harm his opponent.

That's the current lie, yes.

Impeachment is aimed at the Dimwinger base..........and Colfax is admitting they are too fucking stupid to understand "bribery", "collusion" and "obstruction".

Their only regret is the people of the US were too smart to see through their Mueller bullshit..

 

[jasonnfree]

And 'they' still haven't found squat on Trump.
Even after three years of trying.


lmao

Several of trump's 'associates' in prison and one awaiting sentencing. That should tell you something.

It does tell me something.

It doesn't have anything to do with the House of Reps (Democrat) hardon to impeach Trump.

Trump impeached himself by bribing the Ukranian president. Even Joe Biden had hijacked an airplane and raped a nun in Ukraine, that had nothing to do with what trump did.
The 2 quid pro quos at the heart of the impeachment inquiry

 

[M14 Shooter]

Trump impeached himself by bribing the Ukranian president

You need to find a new lie - this one expired weeks ago.

 

[Nosmo King]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

You have evidence now? Lol

What do you consider the testimony of Somdland, Taylor, Yovanovich, Vindman?

 

[Oddball]

giddy-up

Trump didn't 'hide' anything from the House.

Or do you mean the 'testimony' behind closed doors the House Dems hid from the public??

Trump has refused all requests at documents and witnesses. I can’t believe you aren’t aware of that.

Trump has no obligation to prove that he dindu nuffin....That's not me, that's centuries of western jurisprudence.

I'm sure that a guy like Putin might like someone like you working in his legal system.

He's a government employee and the people have a right to know what public servants are doing with our money

Entirely irrelevant to the point...He has no obligation to prove negatives.

You know what it's like having an unaccountable president? Ask Putin.

We saw it for eight years with your boi Barry Oboingo...Suck it.

No one is asking him to prove anything. He just has to let the truth be known.

Yes they are...They're asking him to prove that he didn't do anything...That's how Putin's system works, commie scum.

 

[Oddball]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

You have evidence now? Lol

What do you consider the testimony of Somdland, Taylor, Yovanovich, Vindman?

Sondland's story changed...His testimony is shit.

Vindman leaked classified information to someone who had no need to know...Should be court martialed.

The rest of them are hearsay "witnesses" whose testimony is entirely irrelevant.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Trump has refused all requests at documents and witnesses. I can’t believe you aren’t aware of that.

Trump has no obligation to prove that he dindu nuffin....That's not me, that's centuries of western jurisprudence.

I'm sure that a guy like Putin might like someone like you working in his legal system.

He's a government employee and the people have a right to know what public servants are doing with our money

Entirely irrelevant to the point...He has no obligation to prove negatives.

You know what it's like having an unaccountable president? Ask Putin.

We saw it for eight years with your boi Barry Oboingo...Suck it.

No one is asking him to prove anything. He just has to let the truth be known.

Yes they are...They're asking him to prove that he didn't do anything...That's how Putin's system works, commie scum.

Don't you know?
When a Democrat lays a charge, onus is on the accused to disprove it.
Ask them - they'll tell you.

 

[colfax_m]

Trump has refused all requests at documents and witnesses. I can’t believe you aren’t aware of that.

Trump has no obligation to prove that he dindu nuffin....That's not me, that's centuries of western jurisprudence.

I'm sure that a guy like Putin might like someone like you working in his legal system.

He's a government employee and the people have a right to know what public servants are doing with our money

Entirely irrelevant to the point...He has no obligation to prove negatives.

You know what it's like having an unaccountable president? Ask Putin.

We saw it for eight years with your boi Barry Oboingo...Suck it.

No one is asking him to prove anything. He just has to let the truth be known.

Yes they are...They're asking him to prove that he didn't do anything...That's how Putin's system works, commie scum.

No, they’re not. They’re asking for information. It happens in every investigation.

 

[Oddball]

Trump has no obligation to prove that he dindu nuffin....That's not me, that's centuries of western jurisprudence.

I'm sure that a guy like Putin might like someone like you working in his legal system.

He's a government employee and the people have a right to know what public servants are doing with our money

Entirely irrelevant to the point...He has no obligation to prove negatives.

You know what it's like having an unaccountable president? Ask Putin.

We saw it for eight years with your boi Barry Oboingo...Suck it.

No one is asking him to prove anything. He just has to let the truth be known.

Yes they are...They're asking him to prove that he didn't do anything...That's how Putin's system works, commie scum.

No, they’re not. They’re asking for information. It happens in every investigation.

It's not the job of the accused to supply anything to anyone....It's the prosecution that has the onus of proving their case.

You're a fucking imbecile, to go along with being a commie stooge.

Dismissed.

 

[Oldstyle]

The Republicans haven't DONE anything yet!!

You should be ashamed of your Democrats who didn't 'hold' a lawful impeachment query.

They’ve drug their heels rather than participate and find the truth. The impeachment inquiry has been perfectly lawful.

Yes, the House Dems have dug their heels in.

Since November 2016 - when Pelosi and Maxine began screeching "Impeach, Impeach!"

Dumb Dems can't even impeach properly.

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

They waited? Dude, the Democrats were trying to impeach Trump as soon as he beat Hillary! Waited? Don't make me laugh! It's been three years of liberals trying desperately to undo a legal election that they lost!

Incorrect. The impeachment investigation started just a few months ago.

Oh, bullshit! The Democratic search for an impeachable offense began as soon as you realized that the "impossible" had just happened...as soon as you realized that Hillary Clinton had lost to Donald Trump!

 

[Oddball]

They’ve drug their heels rather than participate and find the truth. The impeachment inquiry has been perfectly lawful.

Yes, the House Dems have dug their heels in.

Since November 2016 - when Pelosi and Maxine began screeching "Impeach, Impeach!"

Dumb Dems can't even impeach properly.

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

They waited? Dude, the Democrats were trying to impeach Trump as soon as he beat Hillary! Waited? Don't make me laugh! It's been three years of liberals trying desperately to undo a legal election that they lost!

Incorrect. The impeachment investigation started just a few months ago.

Oh, bullshit! The Democratic search for an impeachable offense began as soon as you realized that the "impossible" had just happened...as soon as you realized that Hillary Clinton had lost to Donald Trump!

I suspect a truthmaters or rderp sock puppet....Only those two can possibly be this stupid.

 

[M14 Shooter]

They’ve drug their heels rather than participate and find the truth. The impeachment inquiry has been perfectly lawful.

Yes, the House Dems have dug their heels in.

Since November 2016 - when Pelosi and Maxine began screeching "Impeach, Impeach!"

Dumb Dems can't even impeach properly.

They had to wait for Trump to do something stupid enough to be impeachable. It was only a matter of time really.

They waited? Dude, the Democrats were trying to impeach Trump as soon as he beat Hillary! Waited? Don't make me laugh! It's been three years of liberals trying desperately to undo a legal election that they lost!

Incorrect. The impeachment investigation started just a few months ago.

Oh, bullshit! The Democratic search for an impeachable offense began as soon as you realized that the "impossible" had just happened...as soon as you realized that Hillary Clinton had lost to Donald Trump!

Indeed - before the inauguration, George Snuffleuppagus made mention of the pending - civil - cases against Trump and how they might be the basis for impeachment.

 

[Jitss617]

Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial
The Senate Democratic leader wants to seek testimony from Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton and other White House officials, and subpoena documents the White House has withheld.
Schumer, Pushing McConnell to Negotiate, Lays Out Plan for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON — As the House prepared to make President Trump only the third president in American history to be impeached, the Senate’s top Democrat on Sunday laid out a detailed proposal for a Senate trial “in which all of the facts can be considered fully and fairly” — including subpoenas for documents the White House has withheld and witnesses it has prevented from testifying.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, presented the proposal in a letter to his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell, in an opening move to force Republicans to negotiate over the shape and scope of the proceedings. Mr. McConnell had said last week that he was “taking my cues” from the White House, prompting Democrats to accuse him of abandoning his duty to render “impartial justice” in the trial.

In the letter, Mr. Schumer proposed a trial beginning Jan. 7 that would give each side a fixed amount of time to present its case, and called for four top White House officials who have not previously testified — including Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser — to appear as witnesses.

Mr. Schumer also called for the Senate to subpoena documents that could shed light on the events at the heart of the charges against Mr. Trump: his campaign to enlist Ukraine to investigate his political rivals. And he set forth a specific timetable for each side to present its case, modeled on the one used when President Bill Clinton was tried in 1999. Mr. Clinton’s trial lasted about five weeks.
.....................................................................................................................................
Chuck should know better by now than to think McTurtle has an interest in anything approximating the kind of deliberative trial the Senate is obligated conduct. This is why it was so important for Trump's specious narrative of an unfair process in the House to have been spewed (just as it was equally important to make the similarly, objectively false accusations about the Mueller probe). All the trained seals repeat the sham process lie endlessly and will keep doing so all through the phony process Mitch is about to orchestrate in close consultation with the WH (Mitch has adopted the Trumpian strategy of violating rules, ethics, and law right out in the open). Why does McTreason think he can get away with it? Because he knows from experience The Following will swallow any ball of shit he feeds them. They rather like it.

You have evidence now? Lol

What do you consider the testimony of Somdland, Taylor, Yovanovich, Vindman?

An opinion