Second-quarter GDP jumps 4.1% for best pace in nearly four years

Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
 
Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

Annnnd how much did the QE program prop up the Barrypuppet while the Fed never raised rates the entire 8 years the Barrypuppet was in office???? That's a big time factor even an idiot like yourself should factor in, dipshit.
 
Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
 
Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
 
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
 
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
Why do you ask?
 
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
Why do you ask?
Your grasp of mathematics, obviously.
 
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
Why do you ask?
Your grasp of mathematics, obviously.
I’m glad you’re impressed.

Obama: 17.4 for 8 years comes to 2.2
Trump: 0.0 for 0 years comes to 0.0
 
2017 was Obama's economy just as 2009 was Bush's idiot.
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
Why do you ask?
Your grasp of mathematics, obviously.
I’m glad you’re impressed.

Obama: 17.4 for 8 years comes to 2.2
Trump: 0.0 for 0 years comes to 0.0
Probably useless given your genetic disadvantage but two quarters of 2.63 and 4.1 do not come out to zero. Go ask a white man to explain it to you, or better yet an East Asian.
 
So then it’s 2.2 for Obama and 0.0 for Trump.
Are you black?
Why do you ask?
Your grasp of mathematics, obviously.
I’m glad you’re impressed.

Obama: 17.4 for 8 years comes to 2.2
Trump: 0.0 for 0 years comes to 0.0
Probably useless given your genetic disadvantage but two quarters of 2.63 and 4.1 do not come out to zero. Go ask a white man to explain it to you, or better yet an East Asian.
Oh? What genetic disadvantage is that? And what was posted was his annual average. Starting from this year means he doesn’t have an annual average yet.
 
Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
 
Numbers just released. Last quarter was 2%.
During the Obama years, GDP passed 4.1% four times.
How is it different now?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?
 
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
 
2.2% if you ignore the Great Recession he inherited -- same as Trump.
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.

.... assuming you graduated from second grade.
 
Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.

.... assuming you graduated from second grade.


The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.

Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
 
It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2

Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.

.... assuming you graduated from second grade.


The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.

Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
LOLOL

Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??

Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...

Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)

The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
 
The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.

You're not very good at this.
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.

.... assuming you graduated from second grade.


The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.

Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
LOLOL

Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??

Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...

Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)

The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years

Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??

Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.

Thanks for the link.

The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.

Too bad you didn't understand it.

Try this one. Idiot.

Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
 
Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

Do you have different math that shows a different sum?

That's your mistake.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.

.... assuming you graduated from second grade.


The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.

Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
LOLOL

Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??

Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...

Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)

The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years

Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??

Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.

Thanks for the link.

The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.

Too bad you didn't understand it.

Try this one. Idiot.

Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.

CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1

Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??

1233796371590.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top