Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Free pussy doesn't exist. Last night had a lil 'friend" burn through $40 worth of Chilean wine and order up tiger shrimp........that was before the rack of lamb. Hey. It wasn't 130 grand but I aint trump either. It was close to $130 thOne of the less famous prostitutes Trump paid off.Who is karen mcdougal
There are free prostitutes??
Must be damn ugy
nce the xanzi wears off her lil ass I'll see if it was worth it.
She did she said the same thing everyone else has said...Trump wanted the meeting taped.....no there there...I'm sure Sarah Sanders will have a perfectly innocent explanation for these tapes.
No crime that I can see yet.....?
If there is a tape or any proof that Cohen for Donald arranged for the National Inquirer to catch and kill her story for the $130,000 paid to her for the story.... to silence her because it would hurt his campaign, then that would be breaking campaign finance laws, because it was not declared.... is the only thing I can think of....?
But, it seems, it would be the National Enquirer that would have made a donation, to help candidate Trump, and not declare it..... not trump or Cohen? Unless the payment by Trump's best buddy running the National Enquirer, was reimbursed somehow, by Cohen/Trump?
the story alone means nothing, other than the fact that Trump and even Hope Hicks, lied about it to the public, and that is not breaking the law.... if it were, Trump would have been locked up, ages ago....for ALL of his lies to us.
From what I've read and heard on the news trump paid the 150 grand.
He paid the money to the national enquirer and they paid McDougal.
See post #433.I know about the Clinton foundation and her use of the DNC to take out Bernie but GOP corruption I know nothing about...but you made the accusation so come on.....fill us in....or do you only have fake accusations?Don't be ridiculous. You've heard it all, you don't believe it or you're fine with it. I'm sure as shit not gonna roll it out for you again
You must be CNN....
So what? No money exchanged.... and this was a 'privileged' conversation between a client and attorney.. So the ends now justify the means for you folks.. I wonder how this would play out if we seized Hillary's communications and randomly exposed her conduct? Would we find collusion with the Russians? Treason?And now for the cultists to deny, deny, deny. Clinton had emails. But lordy, there are tapes.
Stormy Daniels
have a link?
and this was a 'privileged' conversation between a client and attorney.
The recording was made when Cohen WAS HIS LEGAL COUNCIL. That privilege does not end once he is no longer his council. It remains for life.and this was a 'privileged' conversation between a client and attorney.
How do you figure that? The only way privilege could possibly apply is if Cohen was providing legal advice or other legal work. Paying off a mistress so that she won't reveal a decade old affair isn't legal work.
Dumbfuck, that was Susan McDougal, not Karen McDougal.Who is karen mcdougal
My question as well.
Perfectly understandable to lose track of the women that Trump has had extra-marital relationships with and paid off to keep quiet.
Nah. I think its more about Whitwater and the Clinton's.
She spent time in jail for refusing to testify against the Clintons.
The recording was made when Cohen WAS HIS LEGAL COUNCIL. That privilege does not end once he is no longer his council. It remains for life.
Dumbfuck, that was Susan McDougal, not Karen McDougal.Who is karen mcdougal
My question as well.
Perfectly understandable to lose track of the women that Trump has had extra-marital relationships with and paid off to keep quiet.
Nah. I think its more about Whitwater and the Clinton's.
She spent time in jail for refusing to testify against the Clintons.
The recording was made when Cohen WAS HIS LEGAL COUNCIL. That privilege does not end once he is no longer his council. It remains for life.and this was a 'privileged' conversation between a client and attorney.
How do you figure that? The only way privilege could possibly apply is if Cohen was providing legal advice or other legal work. Paying off a mistress so that she won't reveal a decade old affair isn't legal work.
You idiots have now opened this box and its time we use it against you just like your doing to Trump....
If Attorney/client privilege doesn't matter any more lets open up all the shit! Lets seize Hillary's crap and put it out there... Uma Abedin and all the others who claimed to be her attorney... Put up all the communications... Lets see them!
That’s for the FEC to determine. They’re looking into it now.Well no crime was committed if it happened.
The libtards think it should be a "campaign" expense and since it wasn't reported as such it is a violation of the campaign finance laws.
In their minds a treasonous and impeachable offense.
Sounds like you’re PMSing. It wasn’t addressed prior to the post I respodended to.Dumbfuck, that was Susan McDougal, not Karen McDougal.Who is karen mcdougal
My question as well.
Perfectly understandable to lose track of the women that Trump has had extra-marital relationships with and paid off to keep quiet.
Nah. I think its more about Whitwater and the Clinton's.
She spent time in jail for refusing to testify against the Clintons.
Dumbfuck, that error has already been thoroughly addressed a half dozen times in this thread. It's over, move on.
Who is karen mcdougal
My question as well.
Campaign finance violations.So what? Where is the crime here?
Charges against Trump for campaign finance violations for in kind payments may be added to the list of crimes committed by the Liar-in-chief now! Wait for the copy to be written to read about this.
Campaign finance violations.So what? Where is the crime here?
Trump allowed this audio recording to be released. Why?
To distract from his Russia treason.
Trump allowed this audio recording to be released. Why?
To distract from his Russia treason.
You could not possibly know the truth of that, and you just made it up, then said it, then it became true, to you. The tape outs Trump in jeopardy in general because it indicates that there are many more tapes. It outs Trump in jeopardy in this specific instance, because it demonstrates intent.So what? No money exchanged..
