aaronleland
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2012
- 33,897
- 11,331
Do your homework instead of jacking off to porn!
No.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do your homework instead of jacking off to porn!
Go ahead then, but use some lubricant. Calluses on your penis are not attractive. I should know!Do your homework instead of jacking off to porn!
No.
Oh no I listen to people more informed than myself all the time I often formulate my opinions based on several different factors. But in this case you can easily read the piece and then voice your criticism using your experts as reference. It’s strange to me that you haven’t done that."My own damned mind" is influenced to a great degree by experts and those more knowledgeable than myself“I am depending on historical experts who have been consultants on this scam and what they say about it.”
that statement right there is the joke. Take a half hour and read the piece and check the sources. Make up your own damn mind. I can find some historical experts on the other side of the argument as well. If I said I I hadn’t read it but was depending on their opinions then you’d surely be calling me a puppet. How is it any different for you?!
every day in dozens of ways. And please don't think this means I never do research myself or investigate to
satisfy my own mind. That isn't what I'm saying at all.
But it's good to know YOU are the guy who never listens to anyone else. That says much about you.
And just knowing the NY Times is bankrolling and backing an avowed Marxist already informs me of just
about all I need know. You can't draw water from a poisoned well and come up with clean water.
Go ahead then, but use some lubricant. Calluses on your penis are not attractive. I should know!Do your homework instead of jacking off to porn!
No.
Correct and those concerns were addressed by the fact checker historians that worked on the project. Did you know that?Legitimate historians have expressed their opinion. It's an editorial by the New York Times.
![]()
Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill To Prevent Schools From Teaching 1619 Project
Conservatives have long railed against the New York Times Magazine project re-examining America’s legacy of slavery.www.forbes.com
Good! I have to do enough teaching my kids real history after they come home with their heads filled with leftist propaganda.
Right-wingers believe all non-whites should go back to their "colored countries". This is especially true for Native Americans. Right-wingers want their children to know the truth, that the United States was founded as a white country, on a white continent that must remain white to be civilized.Well you might as well tell us what you think the truth actually is.
And you wonder why so many people plan to vote against Republicans in November.
Racism is rampant in their ranks.
I hope a reporter asks Trump and every vulnerable Reublican if they agree with Cotton:.
"We have to study the history of slavery and its role and impact on the development of our country because otherwise we can’t understand our country. As the Founding Fathers said, it was the necessary evil upon which the union was built, but the union was built in a way, as Lincoln said, to put slavery on the course to its ultimate extinction,” he said.'
![]()
Bill by Sen. Tom Cotton targets curriculum on slavery | Arkansas Democrat Gazette
WASHINGTON -- A New York Times-based school curriculum emphasizing American slavery instead of American independence has been targeted by U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton.www.arkansasonline.com
But he's right.
Just think about what would have happened otherwise.
There would never have been a United States. The south would have never eliminated slavery at all.
And we would still have black slaves in America today. Right now, there would still be black slaves, because there would never have been a 13th amendment, because there would never have been a constitution.
So your position is the position that supports slavery, in effect. Because that is how your position would have ended up.
If nobody had stuck that dick in your ass it never would have been removed.
Aside from being idiotic.... you seem to be implying with your neanderthal like communication, that slavery didn't exist before the United States. As if, without us creating slavery, it would not have existed.
Slavery predates the United States, and predates the colonies, by oh.... I don't know... 10 thousand years?
Slavery was normal throughout the world. Slavery was the default aspect of every civilization in human history. There were far more white slaves in the Ivory Coast, than black slaves in the US, combined from all US history.
And contrary to idiotic left-wingers, slavery still exists to this very day, in parts of the world as we speak.
Without the formation of the United States, which would not have happened without allowing slavery, the south would never have eliminated slavery.
We would have slaves in America to this day. Not to mention Hitler or the Soviets would have likely taken over all of Europe and who knows how much of the rest of the world, and they had no problem using slaves.
Well dumbfuck, try doing some research. This crap has been called nothing but lies and fabrications by EVERY leading US Historian on either side of the aisle. This shit might be good for wrapping fish or lining the bird cage, that’s it.Why is 1619 leftist propaganda?![]()
Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill To Prevent Schools From Teaching 1619 Project
Conservatives have long railed against the New York Times Magazine project re-examining America’s legacy of slavery.www.forbes.com
Good! I have to do enough teaching my kids real history after they come home with their heads filled with leftist propaganda.
The uneducated idiot spews more bullshit. Again, do some research idiot. This crap has been fully debunked by REAL historians as lies and bullshit. Period. Continue your ignorance.![]()
Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill To Prevent Schools From Teaching 1619 Project
Conservatives have long railed against the New York Times Magazine project re-examining America’s legacy of slavery.www.forbes.com
Good! I have to do enough teaching my kids real history after they come home with their heads filled with leftist propaganda.
Yeah it's really, really hard to keep people loyal to conservative lies when they learn the truth, isn't it?
I always laugh at those who accuse the public education system of "brainwashing" their children, while their send their little darlings to "Christian schools", where they are taught that the Earth is 6000 years old; evolution is a lie; Global warming is a hoax; liberals are communists; and science is not to be believed. All while being segregated from "undesireables" (read gays, non-whites, and liberals).
It would be terrible to have them "brainwashed" by the public school system.
How about no college funding unless the professors are non-political and about half libs and half cons?
And you wonder why so many people plan to vote against Republicans in November.
And you wonder why so many people plan to vote against Republicans in November.
Racism is rampant in their ranks.
I hope a reporter asks Trump and every vulnerable Reublican if they agree with Cotton:.
"We have to study the history of slavery and its role and impact on the development of our country because otherwise we can’t understand our country. As the Founding Fathers said, it was the necessary evil upon which the union was built, but the union was built in a way, as Lincoln said, to put slavery on the course to its ultimate extinction,” he said.'
![]()
Bill by Sen. Tom Cotton targets curriculum on slavery | Arkansas Democrat Gazette
WASHINGTON -- A New York Times-based school curriculum emphasizing American slavery instead of American independence has been targeted by U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton.www.arkansasonline.com
But he's right.
Just think about what would have happened otherwise.
There would never have been a United States. The south would have never eliminated slavery at all.
And we would still have black slaves in America today. Right now, there would still be black slaves, because there would never have been a 13th amendment, because there would never have been a constitution.
So your position is the position that supports slavery, in effect. Because that is how your position would have ended up.
If nobody had stuck that dick in your ass it never would have been removed.
Aside from being idiotic.... you seem to be implying with your neanderthal like communication, that slavery didn't exist before the United States. As if, without us creating slavery, it would not have existed.
Slavery predates the United States, and predates the colonies, by oh.... I don't know... 10 thousand years?
Slavery was normal throughout the world. Slavery was the default aspect of every civilization in human history. There were far more white slaves in the Ivory Coast, than black slaves in the US, combined from all US history.
And contrary to idiotic left-wingers, slavery still exists to this very day, in parts of the world as we speak.
Without the formation of the United States, which would not have happened without allowing slavery, the south would never have eliminated slavery.
We would have slaves in America to this day. Not to mention Hitler or the Soviets would have likely taken over all of Europe and who knows how much of the rest of the world, and they had no problem using slaves.
Your argument is that the only way we could have ended slavery is to continue it's practice?
You and petro have the same ignorance issue... Your ignorant of US history...Still the Neanderthal dim witted post that assumes every party for 200 plus years with the same name had the same values.It amazes me how selective the dimwits are when they make stupid shit like this an issue... They forget that the KKK was a DEMOCRAT ORGANIZATION and if you weren't a Klansman you didn't go up in the democrat leadership..
What’s the top lies that you take issue with? Give me 2 or 3 specific ones.... I’d love to read about them and dig inWell dumbfuck, try doing some research. This crap has been called nothing but lies and fabrications by EVERY leading US Historian on either side of the aisle. This shit might be good for wrapping fish or lining the bird cage, that’s it.Why is 1619 leftist propaganda?![]()
Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill To Prevent Schools From Teaching 1619 Project
Conservatives have long railed against the New York Times Magazine project re-examining America’s legacy of slavery.www.forbes.com
Good! I have to do enough teaching my kids real history after they come home with their heads filled with leftist propaganda.
You know everything. While living the good life. Tell us who it was who financed the slave trade. Give us the names of people. The names of ship Captains. This seems to be a big deal but these things get muddied at the source. Even the Roots writer was fuzzy. Name the people who promoted, financed and made a business out of the slave trade from Africa to other environs. Never get those names. Tell us those names. Then you can start from there.the more Cotton talks, the more he sounds like an arrogant blowhard!