usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2017
- 10,923
- 1,635
So how do you get Russia input to cooberate stories? Or are you talking wire tapping?Well go get a warrantWhat people are saying is so fking what?Why is it so hard for people to see that the issue is not merely that people met with or talked to Putin or any other Russian, but rather that they did and when asked about it, they deny having done so, and that behavior in turn calls into question what transpired during the interactions such that denying they happened was considered necessary, especially, but not solely, insofar as the Americans involved weren't empowered to interact on behalf of the U.S. with any Russian. If the contact was so innocently innocuous, why deny that it happened or voluntarily assert that it didn't happen?
Well, the "so what" of it depends on what was discussed, and the people involved aren't exactly forthcoming about that seeing as they have each begun from a position of having denied the existentiality of interactions.and relationships.Well go get a warrant
Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?
If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.
Getting Russia's/Russians' input isn't the point. Americans were asked about their interactions and relationships with Russians, and they denied having any, only to later to be found to have had both. That's what's wrong.