Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Senate Impeachment Trial Thread.
- Thread starter Nostra
- Start date
JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 14,718
- 15,258
- 2,405
Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.You guys ever hear of the US Constitution. Here is the wording on impeachment:
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
It is true that those wailing for witnesses and evidence do not specify the truth, that is they only want certain witnesses and evidence produced. Should McConnell, for example, call only those the president allows to testify that have not already, the shrieks would suddenly cease to be about getting all the evidence out.The DemTards want witnesses.
Clinton did not have new witnesses and they never publicly testified.
But if we are to have witnesses, these are the witnesses I would suggest.
Joe Biden
Hunter Biden
Whistleblower 1
Whistleblower 2
Zaid the Whistleblower's Lawyer
Seth Rich's Family
Julian Assange
and the witness for The Dems?
Let them interview John Bolton
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,078
- 56,900
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #124
That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.You guys ever hear of the US Constitution. Here is the wording on impeachment:
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
There is not One Leftist you will be able to get a Single Truthful Opinion From, None of them are worth a Runny Shit.That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.Don't see anything in there about the Senate conducting an investigation.Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming. Here is the wording from the Constitution.
Oops!
By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
-That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.Don't see anything in there about the Senate conducting an investigation.Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming. Here is the wording from the Constitution.
Oops!
By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
damn son, your way behind answering my questions that totally debunk your Trump/Clinton bullshit lie thread -
tie this around your ass and consider it another xmas present
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
The Proof is there is you just give The DemNazis 5 more years to find it!That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.You guys ever hear of the US Constitution. Here is the wording on impeachment:
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,078
- 56,900
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #128
How the fuck do you think some yes or no question debunks anything?-That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.Don't see anything in there about the Senate conducting an investigation.
Oops!
By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
damn son, your way behind answering my questions that totally debunk your Trump/Clinton bullshit lie thread -
View attachment 301781View attachment 301782
tie this around your ass and consider it another xmas present
You have brought nothing. Zip. Zero. Nada.
You are a punk who has nothing of substance to offer in any thread.
JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 14,718
- 15,258
- 2,405
That makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, in the second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.You guys ever hear of the US Constitution. Here is the wording on impeachment:
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Have you toppled and burned the false altar to Mueller you prayed to for the past 3 years?-That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.Don't see anything in there about the Senate conducting an investigation.
Oops!
By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
damn son, your way behind answering my questions that totally debunk your Trump/Clinton bullshit lie thread -
View attachment 301781View attachment 301782
tie this around your ass and consider it another xmas present
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,078
- 56,900
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #132
That makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, int he second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
Once again I will educate you on how our system works. The WH challenged the House subpoenas in court. The House should have gone to court for a ruling. They didn't.
That isn't obstruction of Congress, that is how our system works as laid out in the Constitution.
Nazi and her gang being in a hurry doesn't negate how our system works.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Show me in The Constitution where The President has to do one damn thing Schiff wants him to do.That makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, int he second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?Your Ignorance and lies are well, Worthy of Damnation To Hell, you Lying Worker of Iniquity. Due Process was completely violated. This should be dismissed completely.
Rep. Ratcliffe on Dems' impeachment case: Lack of fairness and due process will 'surprise' senators
There was a disparity in the way President Clinton and President Nixon were treated during their impeachment inquiries as opposed to President Trump," he remarked. "The Nixon and Clinton lawyers were allowed to participate every single day from the beginning to the end. They were allowed to review evidence, suggest evidence, call witnesses and cross-examine witnesses."
By Contrast, President Trump -- during his 78-day impeachment inquiry -- his lawyers were forbidden from participating for this first 71 of a 78-day process," Ratcliffe continued. "Not allowed to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, be there for the presentation or review of evidence."
"That is a lack of due process and fairness that I think all senators, Republican and Democrat, are going to be surprised to learn," he stated. "I think, as a result of that, they were not going to want to hear any witnesses because the Senate isn't going to be able to fix what happened in the House."
"[Democrats] can't make constitutional arguments because they don't have any," Ratcliffe concluded. "This impeachment fails."
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
You are allowed to contest subpoenas especially ones that involve separation of powers and executive privilege.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
CorrectamundoThat makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, int he second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
Once again I will educate you on how our system works. The WH challenged the House subpoenas in court. The House should have gone to court for a ruling. They didn't.
That isn't obstruction of Congress, that is how our system works as laid out in the Constitution.
Nazi and her gang being in a hurry doesn't negate how our system works.
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
How the fuck do you think some yes or no question debunks anything?-That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
damn son, your way behind answering my questions that totally debunk your Trump/Clinton bullshit lie thread -
View attachment 301781View attachment 301782
tie this around your ass and consider it another xmas present
You have brought nothing. Zip. Zero. Nada.
You are a punk who has nothing of substance to offer in any thread.
ignore my questions then claim no substance -
thats how f'n stupid you are .
you and tree are running a close race for Russian of the day -
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
There is no comparison between The President's Case and his attorneys and Bitch Adolph Schiffler and his lies, and I hope they punish that piece of Schiff every day until this is over.That makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, int he second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
Once again I will educate you on how our system works. The WH challenged the House subpoenas in court. The House should have gone to court for a ruling. They didn't.
That isn't obstruction of Congress, that is how our system works as laid out in the Constitution.
Nazi and her gang being in a hurry doesn't negate how our system works.
Zander
Platinum Member
Shampeachment trial will be a ratings flop. Nobody cares. 
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Your being stupid enough to be involved in any discussion where Truth is in Direct Opposition to your Lies, isn't our fault. It's not our job to make your Lies look like Truth, or to stop you from looking like a Hairy Man Butt Loving Asswipe of a Lying Son of a Bitch.How the fuck do you think some yes or no question debunks anything?-That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
damn son, your way behind answering my questions that totally debunk your Trump/Clinton bullshit lie thread -
View attachment 301781View attachment 301782
tie this around your ass and consider it another xmas present
You have brought nothing. Zip. Zero. Nada.
You are a punk who has nothing of substance to offer in any thread.
ignore my questions then claim no substance -
thats how f'n stupid you are .
you and tree are running a close race for Russian of the day -
JLW
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 14,718
- 15,258
- 2,405
That makes no sense. The WH refused to cooperate with Shiff as well that resulted, you know, int he second article of impeachment.That was once it was turned over to Nadless. All the witnesses were questioned by Schifferbrains and his committee.Liar: Tell one more Lie and You are on IgnoreTrump was allowed to participate in the impeachment and inquiry and chose not to do so. You do remember that, don't you?
White House won't take part in House Judiciary impeachment hearings
Nadless was just a rubber stamp.
Oops!
Once again I will educate you on how our system works. The WH challenged the House subpoenas in court. The House should have gone to court for a ruling. They didn't.
That isn't obstruction of Congress, that is how our system works as laid out in the Constitution.
Nazi and her gang being in a hurry doesn't negate how our system works.
LOL...Constitutional scholar you are not.
Here is a link to the actual articles:
Read the Articles of Impeachment Against President Trump
Read and learn
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
ITS LIVE *
LIVE: Senate Impeachment Trial Of President Trump
LIVE: Senate Impeachment Trial Of President Trump
Similar threads
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 300
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 331
- Replies
- 77
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 58
- Views
- 121
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 23
- Replies
- 110
- Views
- 549
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8518
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 484
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-