Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If your too stupid to know the answer to that question then there is nothing I can do for you.Are you still here?I don;t see the Trump team repeating anything your saying.You think it is a good thing that you and Schiff are saying the same thing?Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
you disappeared after I asked if you knew the charges against trump by a 13-year old girl had been dropped when you posted the story here
These ridiculous Subpoenas that Soviet Schummet wants violate Executive Privilege and should not be allowed.
Are you still here?I don;t see the Trump team repeating anything your saying.You think it is a good thing that you and Schiff are saying the same thing?Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
you disappeared after I asked if you knew the charges against trump by a 13-year old girl had been dropped when you posted the story here
They don't have to bother with that, since there is not one violation of US Code that appears in The Fake Articles.I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Odd, I thought they weren't allowed to interrupt.
are you saying they are?
Impeachment is defined as Gross Violations of High Crimes and Misdemeanors.Are you still here?I don;t see the Trump team repeating anything your saying.You think it is a good thing that you and Schiff are saying the same thing?Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
you disappeared after I asked if you knew the charges against trump by a 13-year old girl had been dropped when you posted the story here
not a criminal trial = no charges
political impeachment = articles
run along now, the grown ups have the floor.
Let me ask you a question though I suspect I will just get an answer that is the equivalent of dead wood.They don't have to bother with that, since there is not one violation of US Code that appears in The Fake Articles.I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Odd, I thought they weren't allowed to interrupt.
are you saying they are?
How about you prove you aren't a little lying bitch and show us what US CODE was violated that constitutes a violation of a High Crime, or Misdemeanor.
You can't so take your lying ass to back to Hell and tell Daddy Satan you failed....again.
They did not have to. The articles of Impeachment contain NO CRIME that can be charged / for which someone can be convicted! The Democrats did NOT 'charge' the President with Extortion'. By your argument, Trump's lawyers should have declared, 'The President did not steal any horses, did not engage in cattle rustling, did not illegally park in a handicap zone, did not cross the street illegally.....I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.
See my post 167They did not have to. The articles of Impeachment contain NO CRIME that can be charged / for which someone can be convicted! The Democrats did NOT 'charge' the President with Extortion'. By your argument, Trump's lawyers should have declared, 'The President did not steal any horses, did not engage in cattle rustling, did not illegally park in a handicap zone, did not cross the street illegally.....I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.
Disagreements in Foreign Policy is NOT an Impeachable offense.Impeachment is defined as Gross Violations of High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Separation of Powers is not a violation of a US Statute.
The House Impeachment Managers were OVBVIOUSLY UN-prepared for this legal onslaught......WHO KNEW THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE TO PRACTIVE ACTUAL, LEGITIMATE LAW DURING THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT HEARING?
That is their whole strategy to get enough idiots in The Senate to Fall for their Woe is Me, Trump Resisted US, & we want The Senate to give us a DO-OVER .....SCAMAnother House Dimwinger gets up to beg the Senate to do the job they failed to do in the House.
Is this their whole case? "We fucked up, please save us!"
In other words, I don't want to answer my question..LOLDisagreements in Foreign Policy is NOT an Impeachable offense.Impeachment is defined as Gross Violations of High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Separation of Powers is not a violation of a US Statute.
Extreme Butt-Hurt is NOT.
Losing an election is NOT
No, I do not think I will...because there is no need to. The President has not been charged with Bribery or Extortion. If you disagree show me where he is in the Articles of Impeachment, and provide the link,.Otherwise, thank you for playing.....See my post 167
I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Odd, I thought they weren't allowed to interrupt.
are you saying they are?
These lying assholes only pretend to not know what The Constitution Says.The House Impeachment Managers were OVBVIOUSLY UN-prepared for this legal onslaught......WHO KNEW THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE TO PRACTIVE ACTUAL, LEGITIMATE LAW DURING THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT HEARING?
It's a wonder to me how it seems that I know more about what the constitution
means and says than the idiot democommie dimwits in congress. Or maybe they just like to pretend that it doesn't say what it most clearly does. This dangerous bunch of
assholes belong in federal prison cells.
fleas and nats.That's the best ya got when getting called out for your lies?More lies by you.Don't see anything in there about the Senate conducting an investigation.Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 provides:
The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
The ignorance on this board is overwhelming. Here is the wording from the Constitution.
Oops!
By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.
OOOOOOPS
Feel free to bring where I said either of those things you claim I said, liar.
GO!
TYPICAL ANSWER FROM A TRUMP TURD POLISHER
You are no match, son. Run along.
Now that is funny coming from you.These lying assholes only pretend to not know what The Constitution Says.The House Impeachment Managers were OVBVIOUSLY UN-prepared for this legal onslaught......WHO KNEW THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE TO PRACTIVE ACTUAL, LEGITIMATE LAW DURING THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT HEARING?
It's a wonder to me how it seems that I know more about what the constitution
means and says than the idiot democommie dimwits in congress. Or maybe they just like to pretend that it doesn't say what it most clearly does. This dangerous bunch of
assholes belong in federal prison cells.
Let me ask you a question though I suspect I will just get an answer that is the equivalent of dead wood.They don't have to bother with that, since there is not one violation of US Code that appears in The Fake Articles.I am saying Trump's TV lawyers could have said "My client did nothing wrong in extorting the Ukraine!" or such some similar words. They did not do so.Schiff just said the same thing I posted to all you all. Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Not one word of denial by Trump's TV lawyers.
Odd, I thought they weren't allowed to interrupt.
are you saying they are?
How about you prove you aren't a little lying bitch and show us what US CODE was violated that constitutes a violation of a High Crime, or Misdemeanor.
You can't so take your lying ass to back to Hell and tell Daddy Satan you failed....again.
If a president of the USA gave our nuclear codes to Iran, would that be an impeachable offense?
