Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s the point I just made. Because it’s all political. Unless the bring an actual violation of an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?this case wouldn’t even go to a legitimate courtroom.
It is not a legal proceeding, it is a political one.
Are you really this uneducated or is it just an act?
That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
That’s the point I just made. Because it’s all political. Unless the bring an actual violation of an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?this case wouldn’t even go to a legitimate courtroom.
It is not a legal proceeding, it is a political one.
Are you really this uneducated or is it just an act?
Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment.
Why do you people keep bringing this up?
There is no such requirement.
From the GOP...
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment.
Why do you people keep bringing this up?
There is no such requirement.
From the GOP...
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
So it admitted it is political. Very good. Now sell that bullshit to US voters?That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.
So it admitted it is political. Very good. Now sell that bullshit to US voters?That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.
It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment.
Why do you people keep bringing this up?
There is no such requirement.
From the GOP...
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?
It’s a trial. The Chief Justice will decide.Relevance. Why are you people not bringing relevant, legal, charges?McConnell sets stage for impeachment trial launch, warns 'both sides' could call witnesses
Not a single violation of federal law in any of the Articles of Impeachment.
Why do you people keep bringing this up?
There is no such requirement.
From the GOP...
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
Because no legal charges are necessary...why can you not read?
Here is my understanding...
They have to sit quietly and listen to opening statements from both sides...after that it only takes 1 senator to motion to dismiss and 1 senator to second the motion.
At that point they HAVE TO vote on it.
51 ayes and the case is dismissed.
But I would be good with putting all the democrat filth under oath...GO FOR IT !
Don’t you think in 2020 Democrats should have the responsibility to make it so?That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.
Really? They designed a trial... even though 55 of them in 1787 were lawyers...so it could be politically motivated crap? Not seeing it?So it admitted it is political. Very good. Now sell that bullshit to US voters?That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.
Of course it is political, that is the way our Founding Fathers designed it. There is no other way for it to be.
Never going to happen. Takes 2/3rds of Senate to remove ...Just makes him more popular with public and the people.Here is my understanding...
They have to sit quietly and listen to opening statements from both sides...after that it only takes 1 senator to motion to dismiss and 1 senator to second the motion.
At that point they HAVE TO vote on it.
51 ayes and the case is dismissed.
But I would be good with putting all the democrat filth under oath...GO FOR IT !
Derp....
A day late and a dollar short per usual with the Trumpers.
GOP leadership: There aren't 51 votes to dismiss Trump articles of impeachment
Should just be gaveled out. Charges so pathetically weak.It's going to last more than 5 minutes, because both sides have to do opening statements before they even vote on whether to call witnesses. And the opening statements are estimated to take approximately two weeks.
Why is it calmed “a trial?” Not political...legal.So it admitted it is political. Very good. Now sell that bullshit to US voters?That’s the point I just made. P? It’s all political. Unless the bring ‘p(the leftist, Marx, Democrats) an actual law by this President...then I gues the laws wasn’t violated?
It was designed to be political, that is the way the Constitution sets it up, it was never meant to be a legal proceeding.
Of course it is political, that is the way our Founding Fathers designed it. There is no other way for it to be.
Your mental illness is that you believe Dems are more honest than Pubs.Might as well last five minutes
The fix is in
Are you going to get in the way of their lulus?Should just be gaveled out. Charges so pathetically weak.It's going to last more than 5 minutes, because both sides have to do opening statements before they even vote on whether to call witnesses. And the opening statements are estimated to take approximately two weeks.