For those who don't know, here's what we're talking about.
![]()
As you can see, if you're on the left side, then a cut in tax rates would lead to less revenue and a raise in rates would lead to more revenue. So, it would stand to reason that if we cut rates and see a drop in revenue, we are on the left side of the curve, right?
From 2001 to 2003 Bush cut tax rates and in all three years revenue dropped. That had never happened in modern history prior to Bush.
We cut tax rates, revenue dropped, ergo, we're on the left side of the Laffer Curve.
Yes, and the tax cuts didn't go into effect until 2003. So there is that talking point you keep regurgitating blown up in your face. The revenue was down in 2000 also. It was called the NASDAQ bubble burst.
Jeebus, you're fuckin' stupid.
100% false.
The first round of cuts happened in 2001, retroactive to the beginning of that year.
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From your link:
Many of the tax reductions in EGTRRA were designed to be phased in over a period of up to 9 years. Many of these slow phase-ins were accelerated by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA), which removed the waiting periods for many of EGTRRA's changes.