JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
- Thread starter
- #21
I'm not a huge NFL fan, so I had to do a little more research.
Which explains your silly ass view of Tebow being a better tight end.
Do either of you think the 9 INTs he threw or the 14 fumbles (lost 6) had anything to do with any of this?
Tebow had among the fewest interceptions ranked 32nd highest number, got sacked 33 times to come in at 12th highest (due to porous line), and his 6 fumbles were typical of a QB avoiding the rush because of a weak line, and that tied him with Vick and was one more than Ryan Matthews.
In fact Tebow has been noted to not turn over the ball very often for a QB.
Vox Popoli: Mailvox: thinking Tebow through
The Broncos simply don't turn the ball over in the Tebow offense. In six games, he has one INT and one fumble lost. That is absolutely huge in the day of the frequent pick-six. Let's look at the three elite quarterbacks castricv mentioned. Drew Brees has 7 INT 0 FL in the last six games. Brady has 5 INT 1 FL in the same span. So, you have to factor in Tebow's turnover rate of .333 compared to 1.16 and 1.0. Part of Aaron Rodgers incredible value as a QB comes from his low turnover rate of 0.333, the same as Tebow's. I think this is an aspect of the position that analysts are leaving out of the equation and helps explain why the Broncos are winning despite everyone's expectations.
Found this on his Wiki page: "Despite on-field successes by the Broncos under Tebow, he finished the season with the lowest passing completion rate in the NFL which led many to question his potential as a quarterback at the professional level"
NFL Stats: by Player Category
There were 5 other QBs with lower completion percentages, and Tebow took the lead of a weak team that forced him to throw out of bounds and he had a bigger than average share of dropped balls.
Oh, and just an FYI, Jim, I am neither a "libtard" nor a "Christ-hater".
So you say.