🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Shots fired at Ferguson market after CNN broadcasts fake news & edited GGTV footage

So let me try to understand the liberal mind. Brown was a Boy Scout because he was only selling drugs and assaulting an old man? Even though the clearly edited and highly manipulated video proves nothing other than Brown didn't pay for his goods, try to leave the store and assaulted an elderly store clerk on the way out.

Nevertheless it is meaningless. The store clerk called the police and made a robbery report. Wilson stopped the over sized animal and the animal attacked. Case closed!

But that was the point. The store clerk/owner didn't report the robbery.. because then it would come out they were dealing drugs.

Here's the more important question. Why did the Ferguson PD and the State's attorney hide this information for nearly two years?

Of course, Wilson wasn't responding to a "robbery", he was hassling two black kids walking on the street because in your America, that's okay.

He tried to exchange weed for tge cigarrelos, the clerk refused, later he attacked a cop, hands up don't shoot is a lie used to bolster the racist terrorist organization known as BLM, but black lies don't matter.
 
So let me try to understand the liberal mind. Brown was a Boy Scout because he was only selling drugs and assaulting an old man? Even though the clearly edited and highly manipulated video proves nothing other than Brown didn't pay for his goods, try to leave the store and assaulted an elderly store clerk on the way out.

Nevertheless it is meaningless. The store clerk called the police and made a robbery report. Wilson stopped the over sized animal and the animal attacked. Case closed!

But that was the point. The store clerk/owner didn't report the robbery.. because then it would come out they were dealing drugs.

Here's the more important question. Why did the Ferguson PD and the State's attorney hide this information for nearly two years?

Of course, Wilson wasn't responding to a "robbery", he was hassling two black kids walking on the street because in your America, that's okay.


Ever the thug apologist.
 
So in your version Dirt Nap was buying drugs from an old man who he then assaulted,then the so called drug dealer called the cops. Yeah...you run with that.

You're some kinda stupid.

Again, the old man didn't call the cops... and now we know why. The cops were called by someone else in the store who had no idea what was going on.

and Wilson wasn't responding to a robbery, he was hassling two black kids who were jaywalking. The whole "Robbery" story was something the Corrupt Ferguson PD made up later. That's becoming increasingly clear.

Oh no, joeb is a special kind of stupid. There's no "kinda" about it. The video is a farce. The producer is a loon. I watched an interview with him and he is truly a nut case.

So why did the police hide the earlier video if it wasn't relevant?
 
It doesn't do that in the slightest unless you are looking for an excuse. The fact is the deal failed because the unedited video shows the clerks putting the stuff back where it originated from on the shelves. Thus the deal failed, which demolishes the claim that he went back to pick up his stuff. However, it doesn't matter because the cop stopped him because he was acting like an asshole in the middle of the street. He had no clue that the idiot had strong armed a store.

A bunch of problems with that theory.

1) They put it back After he left.
2) They kept his weed
3) If the video shows what you claim it does, why did the Ferguson PD intentionally hide this and not show it to the jury.

So now that we've destroyed the 'Strong arm Robbery" narrative, we are back to Officer McShooty's word that he was just telling jaywalkers to get out of the street when they attacked him for no reason.

A narrative contradicted by several eyewitnesses.

You see, my problem is that you have Jason Van Dyke, who claimed that LaQuan McDonald Lunged at him and he only shot him once (When the video shows him moving away and he was shot 16 times, mostly when he was lying on the ground.)

Or Michael Slager, who claimed that Walter Scott was reaching for his taser, when video emerged showing him shooting the guy in the back.

Or Encino, who claimed Sandra Bland assaulted him, when the video shows him losing his shit and pinning this poor woman to the ground.

But we are supposed to take Darren Wilson's word for it, despite contraditions in the witness testimony, flaws in logic, and now pretty clear evidence the police department and DA suppressed evidence...
 
So in your version Dirt Nap was buying drugs from an old man who he then assaulted,then the so called drug dealer called the cops. Yeah...you run with that.

You're some kinda stupid.

Again, the old man didn't call the cops... and now we know why. The cops were called by someone else in the store who had no idea what was going on.

and Wilson wasn't responding to a robbery, he was hassling two black kids who were jaywalking. The whole "Robbery" story was something the Corrupt Ferguson PD made up later. That's becoming increasingly clear.

Oh no, joeb is a special kind of stupid. There's no "kinda" about it. The video is a farce. The producer is a loon. I watched an interview with him and he is truly a nut case.

So why did the police hide the earlier video if it wasn't relevant?

Nobody hid anything, how do you think the terrorist propagandist got his hands on the film to edit and manipulate?
 
He tried to exchange weed for tge cigarrelos, the clerk refused, later he attacked a cop, hands up don't shoot is a lie used to bolster the racist terrorist organization known as BLM, but black lies don't matter.

Guy, if BLM was terrorist, we'd all be in trouble.

The Clerk didn't refuse, he kept the weed.

Oh, yeah, and important point. If the video says what you claim it does, why did the PD and DA hide it for two years?
 
Nobody hid anything, how do you think the terrorist propagandist got his hands on the film to edit and manipulate?

They had the clips of "Strong arming" (actually someone reacting to someone laying hands on him) out in the public domain in days of the shooting. But hid this for two years.
 
It doesn't do that in the slightest unless you are looking for an excuse. The fact is the deal failed because the unedited video shows the clerks putting the stuff back where it originated from on the shelves. Thus the deal failed, which demolishes the claim that he went back to pick up his stuff. However, it doesn't matter because the cop stopped him because he was acting like an asshole in the middle of the street. He had no clue that the idiot had strong armed a store.

A bunch of problems with that theory.

1) They put it back After he left.
2) They kept his weed
3) If the video shows what you claim it does, why did the Ferguson PD intentionally hide this and not show it to the jury.

You are a lying piece of shit faggot, they did not keep the weed as the unedited footage proves, and nobody hid a fucking thing how else would the terrorist propagandist gotten his hands on the original footage to deceptively edit in order to convince stupid n!ggers like you? Fucking kill yourself bitch.
 
He tried to exchange weed for tge cigarrelos, the clerk refused, later he attacked a cop, hands up don't shoot is a lie used to bolster the racist terrorist organization known as BLM, but black lies don't matter.

Guy, if BLM was terrorist, we'd all be in trouble.

They have openly called for the murder of police officers and the looting and arson of white neighborhoods, actions which members have committed, so fuck you n!gger!

The Clerk didn't refuse, he kept the weed.

No you're a lying little faggot, they didn't keep it.

Oh, yeah, and important point. If the video says what you claim it does, why did the PD and DA hide it for two years?

Then how did Pollack get the tape you stupid fuck?
 
Nobody hid anything, how do you think the terrorist propagandist got his hands on the film to edit and manipulate?

They had the clips of "Strong arming" (actually someone reacting to someone laying hands on him) out in the public domain in days of the shooting. But hid this for two years.

If this was hidden then how did Pollack get his hands on it you stupid fuck?
 
You are a lying piece of shit faggot, they did not keep the weed as the unedited footage proves, and nobody hid a fucking thing how else would the terrorist propagandist gotten his hands on the original footage to deceptively edit in order to convince stupid n!ggers like you? Fucking kill yourself bitch.

So I'm taking it you didn't actually watch the video, given the fact you are spewing and no longer talking now.

They have openly called for the murder of police officers and the looting and arson of white neighborhoods, actions which members have committed, so fuck you n!gger!

Who are "they"?

Black Lives Matter Leader Condemns Violence at St. Paul Protest

The founder of St. Paul’s Black Lives Matter chapter denounced the violent protesters who blocked a major interstate and attacked police officers Saturday night in the Twin Cities, saying they did a disservice to the officers trying to maintain order and that their actions did nothing to further the group's goals.

moving right along.

If this was hidden then how did Pollack get his hands on it you stupid fuck?

You mean why did it take two years to get it?
 
.

So now that we've destroyed the 'Strong arm Robbery" narrative, we are back to Officer McShooty's word that he was just telling jaywalkers to get out of the street when they attacked him for no reason.

You didn't destroy a thing you lying fuck the store reported the strong arm robbery which occurred the next night. Furthermore; we are not relying on the word of the officer we are relying on the forensic investigation and the DOJ report you fucking propagandist.
 
You didn't destroy a thing you lying fuck the store reported the strong arm robbery which occurred the next night. Furthermore; we are not relying on the word of the officer we are relying on the forensic investigation and the DOJ report you fucking propagandist.

Except the Forensic investigation raises as many questions as it answers.

Such as, if Brown was "Charging" when he was shot at 12 times (8 of which hit) why is the space between blood spots on the pavement only 14 feet.

14 feet isn't even a leisurely stroll.

All the DOJ report said was that the DOJ couldn't make a civil rights charge. Quite right. It was up to the State to charge Wilson with murder and they failed to do so, because - again- suppressed evidence.
 
You are a lying piece of shit faggot, they did not keep the weed as the unedited footage proves, and nobody hid a fucking thing how else would the terrorist propagandist gotten his hands on the original footage to deceptively edit in order to convince stupid n!ggers like you? Fucking kill yourself bitch.

So I'm taking it you didn't actually watch the video, given the fact you are spewing and no longer talking now.

Shove your edited video up your lying ass, this has the real footage:

Ferguson protests: Shots fired, one officer with a broken nose, attempted arson of a police car - Hot Air

Who are "they"?

Black Lives Matter Leader Condemns Violence at St. Paul Protest

The founder of St. Paul’s Black Lives Matter chapter denounced the violent protesters who blocked a major interstate and attacked police officers Saturday night in the Twin Cities, saying they did a disservice to the officers trying to maintain order and that their actions did nothing to further the group's goals.

moving right along.

Start with Deray McKesson who has called for looting.

You mean why did it take two years to get it?

Prove that anyone was concealing the tape.
 
Shove your edited video up your lying ass, this has the real footage:

Except nowhere does it show Brown taking back his baggie.. And he puts the bag behind the counter for safekeeping.

That the store clerks decided to rip him off after the fact is irrelevent.

Prove that anyone was concealing the tape.

Was it entered into evidence with the Grand Jury?
 
You didn't destroy a thing you lying fuck the store reported the strong arm robbery which occurred the next night. Furthermore; we are not relying on the word of the officer we are relying on the forensic investigation and the DOJ report you fucking propagandist.

Except the Forensic investigation raises as many questions as it answers.

Such as, if Brown was "Charging" when he was shot at 12 times (8 of which hit) why is the space between blood spots on the pavement only 14 feet.

14 feet isn't even a leisurely stroll.

Does this make sense your fucking reptilian brain?

All the DOJ report said was that the DOJ couldn't make a civil rights charge.

No it said that Wilsons account was true you lying little bitch.

Quite right. It was up to the State to charge Wilson with murder and they failed to do so, because - again- suppressed evidence.

Civil rights charges are brought by the Feds in lieu of murder charges when the states refuse to bring murder charges you dumb fuck, there was no suppression of evidence.


The Department of Justice investigation into the shooting determined that witnesses who corroborated Wilson's account were credible while those who contradicted his account were not. The witnesses that claimed Brown was surrendering or did not move toward Wilson were not credible; the report stated that their claims were inconsistent with the physical evidence, other witness statements, and in some cases prior statements from the same witness. No witness statements that pointed to Wilson's guilt were determined to be credible. Twenty-four statements were determined to lack any credibility, while eight which were found credible corroborated Wilson's account. Nine did not completely contradict nor corroborate Wilson's account.[50] Several witnesses reported fear of reprisals from the community for providing evidence that corroborated Wilson's account.[50]


Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia

Now fucking kill yourself you lying little faggot.
 
So in your version Dirt Nap was buying drugs from an old man who he then assaulted,then the so called drug dealer called the cops. Yeah...you run with that.

You're some kinda stupid.

Again, the old man didn't call the cops... and now we know why. The cops were called by someone else in the store who had no idea what was going on.

and Wilson wasn't responding to a robbery, he was hassling two black kids who were jaywalking. The whole "Robbery" story was something the Corrupt Ferguson PD made up later. That's becoming increasingly clear.

Oh no, joeb is a special kind of stupid. There's no "kinda" about it. The video is a farce. The producer is a loon. I watched an interview with him and he is truly a nut case.

So why did the police hide the earlier video if it wasn't relevant?







They didn't dumbass. It has been available to anyone who wanted it for well over a year.
 
So let me try to understand the liberal mind. Brown was a Boy Scout because he was only selling drugs and assaulting an old man? Even though the clearly edited and highly manipulated video proves nothing other than Brown didn't pay for his goods, try to leave the store and assaulted an elderly store clerk on the way out.

Nevertheless it is meaningless. The store clerk called the police and made a robbery report. Wilson stopped the over sized animal and the animal attacked. Case closed!

But that was the point. The store clerk/owner didn't report the robbery.. because then it would come out they were dealing drugs.

Here's the more important question. Why did the Ferguson PD and the State's attorney hide this information for nearly two years?

Of course, Wilson wasn't responding to a "robbery", he was hassling two black kids walking on the street because in your America, that's okay.


Yeah...not what the grand jury testimony says ....
 
I saw both versions on Fox last night. Totally fake BS from that bully-boy movie maker.

How is it BS? Clearly, there was a relationship between Brown and the employees of that store that the police lied about and was not presented to the Grand Jury.

They released only the part with the altercation without the events that led up to the altercation.


So......did he take the cigars the next day? Yes...that too is on the video....did he shove the guy at the store? Yes......

Now.....with all of that....did he attack the police officer and fight him for his gun? Black witnesses at the scene said yes.....

End of story twit.
 
So in your version Dirt Nap was buying drugs from an old man who he then assaulted,then the so called drug dealer called the cops. Yeah...you run with that.

You're some kinda stupid.

Again, the old man didn't call the cops... and now we know why. The cops were called by someone else in the store who had no idea what was going on.

and Wilson wasn't responding to a robbery, he was hassling two black kids who were jaywalking. The whole "Robbery" story was something the Corrupt Ferguson PD made up later. That's becoming increasingly clear.

Oh no, joeb is a special kind of stupid. There's no "kinda" about it. The video is a farce. The producer is a loon. I watched an interview with him and he is truly a nut case.

So why did the police hide the earlier video if it wasn't relevant?


So.....you just said someone reported a robbery at the store.......moron. So the cop was responding to a robbery call...moron.......he saw two idiots matching the description in the robbery.....moron.....

And again......the kid attacked the cop...so whatever went before doesn't fucking matter.......
 

Forum List

Back
Top