Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just to remind the board...
We're still waiting on a response to this:
So you haven't been even the slightest bit curious, even as YOU DEFLECT FROM THE SUBJECT OF THE QUERY YOURSELF?
The issue was NOT 'the distinction' the issue was IF THEY REJECT IT OR NOT AND ON WHAT BASIS THEY REST THEIR ADVOCACY?
But... since you've offered up the obscurant response, we should clear up your position on the Adult pursuit of Children for Sexual Gratification... Are you FOR IT OR AGAINST IT?
AND WHY?
have you ever had anal sex with a woman?
oral?
tied one up?
had a 3some?
Yep... I got the hat-trick.
Those are abnormal sexual behaviors Keys, are you the same as a pedophile?
Are they? How so?
well, since you defined homosexual as abnormal to begin with, why don't you explain why it is, then we'll discuss mine.
Anyone noticein' a trend here?
Do ya see the fatal flaw in her reasonin'?
I'm a man bro.
have you ever had anal sex with a woman?
oral?
tied one up?
had a 3some?
Yep... I got the hat-trick.
Those are abnormal sexual behaviors Keys, are you the same as a pedophile?
Are they? How so?
well, since you defined homosexual as abnormal to begin with, why don't you explain why it is, then we'll discuss mine.
I didn't define homosexuality as abnormal... Nature designed the species, establishing the standard from which homosexuality deviates, thus establishing itself as abnormal.
Yep... I got the hat-trick.
Those are abnormal sexual behaviors Keys, are you the same as a pedophile?
Are they? How so?
well, since you defined homosexual as abnormal to begin with, why don't you explain why it is, then we'll discuss mine.
I didn't define homosexuality as abnormal... Nature designed the species, establishing the standard from which homosexuality deviates, thus establishing itself as abnormal.
What a load of shit.
Here , let me help you
1ab·nor·mal
adjective \(ˌ)ab-ˈnȯr-məl, əb-\
: different from what is normal or average : unusual especially in a way that causes problems
The average person does not have anal sex with women, nor have oral sex, nor have threesomes.
So, doing ANY of them is abnormal. Doing ALL of them is truly abnorma
abnormal =/= criminal.
nah, i'm done, you just want to be an idiot. Enjoy
This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.
Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?
No, I think all these so called religions should accept their brothers and sisters like they are supposed to and if they do not it merely highlights their hypocrisy.
What religions are failing to accept their bros and sissies? And please... be specific; at least as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.
.
.
.
Now... just to help ya through this... I am asking for examples where Churches are refusing acceptance of people who despite the sin common to the abomination that is the sexual perversion of homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, which are all irrelevant variations on the same perverse theme..., but who recognize the error of their ways, have admitted that their sexual abnormality is wrong, to both themselves and to God, and have taken action to turn from that sinful behavior and, have openly sought to live a life free from Left-think and the debauchery common to such which threatens to destroy them and by extension, their community. And DESPITE THEIR CONTRITION: THE CHURCH REJECTS THEM.
I ask it that way because THAT is the responsibility of the Christian... to accept the sinner (as are we all) but reject the Left-think (Irrational Ideas which separate us from good, OKA: God.)
This question can apply to all places of worship, so mosques, synagogues, hindu temples etc.
Should places or worship be forced to accommodate for gay weddings?
No, I think all these so called religions should accept their brothers and sisters like they are supposed to and if they do not it merely highlights their hypocrisy.
What religions are failing to accept their bros and sissies? And please... be specific; at least as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.
.
.
.
Now... just to help ya through this... I am asking for examples where Churches are refusing acceptance of people who despite the sin common to the abomination that is the sexual perversion of homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, which are all irrelevant variations on the same perverse theme..., but who recognize the error of their ways, have admitted that their sexual abnormality is wrong, to both themselves and to God, and have taken action to turn from that sinful behavior and, have openly sought to live a life free from Left-think and the debauchery common to such which threatens to destroy them and by extension, their community. And DESPITE THEIR CONTRITION: THE CHURCH REJECTS THEM.
I ask it that way because THAT is the responsibility of the Christian... to accept the sinner (as are we all) but reject the Left-think (Irrational Ideas which separate us from good, OKA: God.)
Personally I can't imagine that a same sex couple would even want a church wedding given the bigoted history. However I have not heard of any churches that flung their arms open to welcome same sex couples and there is this one Christian church that I drive by in the Muskego, WI area that had the message out front that said "just because the government says something is legal it doesn't make it right".....gee, I wonder what they were talking about just two days after the supreme court ruling.
Personally I can't imagine that a same sex couple would even want a church wedding given the bigoted history. However I have not heard of any churches that flung their arms open to welcome same sex couples and there is this one Christian church that I drive by in the Muskego, WI area that had the message out front that said "just because the government says something is legal it doesn't make it right".....gee, I wonder what they were talking about just two days after the supreme court ruling.
So.....you just confirmed again that you think NAMBLA is going to convince everyone it's ok to bugger children, simultaneously confirming that you're besotted with irrational paranoia and need help...and possibly some strong medication.
The voices in your head are not real.
North American Man/Boy Love Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
North American Man/Boy Love Association
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States. It works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors,[1][2] and campaigns for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion.[1][3] Some reports state that the group no longer has regular national meetings, and that as of the late 1990s, to avoid local police infiltration, the organization discouraged the formation of local chapters.[3][4] Around 1995, an undercover detective discovered that there were 1,100 people on the rolls.[3] As of 2005, a newspaper report stated that NAMBLA was based in New York and San Francisco.[3][TBODY] [/TBODY]
A NAMBLA logo. The capital M and lowercase b symbolize a man and a boy.Founded 1978 Founder David Thorstad Type Unincorporated association Focus Pedophile, pederasty activism and education Location Area served US Members N/A Mission Removing age of consent laws
Amazing how you good folks lie about a Judge's ruling. Incest is illegal in the criminal code. Gays falling in love together of legal age is not. Dumbasses.
So.....you just confirmed again that you think NAMBLA is going to convince everyone it's ok to bugger children, simultaneously confirming that you're besotted with irrational paranoia and need help...and possibly some strong medication.
The voices in your head are not real.
No the wiki does that .................
Well that is what the wiki says, looks like advocacy to "bugger childrern"
Once again, do you fucking morons actually think any of this through or are even capable of connecting the dots??
Not only does it look like it, it is plainly stated it is an advocacy group fort just that ...............
"Gays in the military will disrupt unit cohesion" = "Gay marriage will force churches to perform gay marriage"
Only a dumb ass believes either one. And the anti gay marriage team do not believe either themselves. They lie and make shit up to mask their prejudices. Not all of them but most.
Amazing how you good folks lie about a Judge's ruling. Incest is illegal in the criminal code. Gays falling in love together of legal age is not. Dumbasses.
Matters not about the numbers of instances or acts that are being found in the numbers, but what does matter is the right and wrong that is being found in any of these things, and then admitting to that fact alone regardless of the numbers involved. Some problems are more than others as the numbers would suggest, but it only means that there is more work to do in one case verses the other, and that work is to make people realize the wrong that is in each case that is being presented. You do know that there are plenty of spaces here in order to start up a thread on any case that is being crossed or mentioned don't you ? This crossing over of cases or incidents with another is all in hopes to drown a specific case in which is being brought to the surface for discussion of such things in which are wrong in the eyes of most individuals, and for whom are individuals that participate in the reviews of a specific case that is then being brought to light within the context or within the facts that are known about in a specific case. All can be cases that which are considered to be under review at any given time, but they should have their own thread in order to discuss them separately, and this is in order to hold them to be reviewed upon the circumstances that make up the case specifically or in it's uniqueness there of. The wrong may be acquired in which is gauged by a moral code or standard that is lived by, in which could be the same code or standard that could be applied to the other cases as well all depending.Molested children are overwhelmingly attacked by HETERO fascists.
Young girls are overwhelmingly attacked by men.
That's an "inconvenient truth" for those who want to blame gays for child molestations. Remember Chris Hansen's "To Catch A Predator" series on MSNBC Dateline? Heterosexual men drove from sometimes hundreds of miles away to have sex with what they thought was a 13 year old girl (or sometimes a boy) that they chatted up online. They ran the gamut from teachers to cops to Bible youth group leaders. Some had daughters the same age as the girl they attempted to molest.
Now juxtapose this against the claim that hordes of homosexuals are out there molesting children. It's why when I said I don't believe that homosexuals are more likely to molest children it's because that claim doesn't fit with reality as I understand it.
I don't agree with gays, but I don't hate them either. Maybe that's why I see them as human whereas a lot of others see them as malevolent monsters.
Each of those 'men' were sexually abnormal... this the result of long term exposure to... resultant in the inevitable subsequent the obsession with... pornography, the result of crippled cultural standards, brought on in large measure by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.
Long term exposure to pornography normalizes sexual stimulation through redundant exposure to stimuli... such exposure drives the individual to craving farther and farther down the stimulus rabbit hole, wherein 'normal' sexual visuals no longer provides stimulation and the subject craves material of a more forbidden nature... left unchecked, by an individual who is incapable of objective reason, finds their behavior 'NORMAL', the subject will crave action of a forbidden nature to satisfy more and more obsessive, compulsive cravings.
All of which could readily be resolved by a modicum of humility and the means to reason objectively.
Now which of those 'men' would you like to recommend for adopting a child?
You now need to have a neutral third party examine your computer for evidence of lesbian pornography.
Why? Because you need to project that 'everybody does it'?
Lemme ask ya... does 'everyone doin' it', somehow make it right?
If so, why?
If not, why not?
Explain, as simply as possible, why the overwhelming number of perps are heterosexual men preying on young girls?
