Should Trump be impeached?

Mueller didn't say anything in his report about Trump committing a crime. You can't have it both ways.
“The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Of course it doesn't exonerate him because he hasn't been charged. You can't exonerate innocent people. Mueller worded it that way on purpose so morons like you would have something to play with. Trump is innocent. Until Democrats PROVE he committed a crime, you're all just pissing on our shoes and telling us it's raining.
LOLOL

Nice spin, but Mueller actually said, the evidence did not conclusively rule out criminal conduct in terms of obstruction of justice.
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.

Ask Mr. Mueller. Better yet, let the House Committees ask him.
What's stopping them?
 
“The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Of course it doesn't exonerate him because he hasn't been charged. You can't exonerate innocent people. Mueller worded it that way on purpose so morons like you would have something to play with. Trump is innocent. Until Democrats PROVE he committed a crime, you're all just pissing on our shoes and telling us it's raining.
LOLOL

Nice spin, but Mueller actually said, the evidence did not conclusively rule out criminal conduct in terms of obstruction of justice.
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.

Ask Mr. Mueller. Better yet, let the House Committees ask him.

What's stopping them?

Trump tried - you ought to keep up. Mr. Mueller and the Committee chairs are negotiating.
 
This silly talk of impeachment by the Democrat assholes is nothing more than the filthy Moon Bats being scared shitless of the treason and corruption under the Obama administration being exposed.


Screen_Shot_2019-05-23_at_7_29_01_PM_png-955798.JPG
 
This silly talk of impeachment by the Democrat assholes is nothing more than the filthy Moon Bats being scared shitless of the treason and corruption under the Obama administration being exposed.


Screen_Shot_2019-05-23_at_7_29_01_PM_png-955798.JPG

Do you have any more conspiracy theories to share?


No crime, no coverup no Democrat wins election.

Obama and all that filth that worked in the Administration of Destruction and Treason go to jail.

God bless America.
 
“The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Of course it doesn't exonerate him because he hasn't been charged. You can't exonerate innocent people. Mueller worded it that way on purpose so morons like you would have something to play with. Trump is innocent. Until Democrats PROVE he committed a crime, you're all just pissing on our shoes and telling us it's raining.
LOLOL

Nice spin, but Mueller actually said, the evidence did not conclusively rule out criminal conduct in terms of obstruction of justice.
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.
Who knows what you're talking about? He did say what he found.

The 10 instances of possible obstruction in Mueller report
Pitiful little weak bitch.
LOLOL

Your concession is accepted.
 
Obama interfered in Israel's election.

Hamas runs Palestine. Obama sent them $221 million on Friday Jan. 20th before he left office.

And now we learn Power was spying on American citizens who opposed her Israel policy and unmasked their names.

Appalling!


Red Nation Rising (@RedNationRising) May 24, 2019
 

BREAKING: White House plans to declassify documents showing that Samantha Power was on a “one-woman crusade” for the Palestinians and against Israel in 2016. Repeated unmakings were used to ensure her effort did not fail - @OANN

— Jack Posobiec \uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDF8 (@JackPosobiec) May 24, 2019
 
Of course it doesn't exonerate him because he hasn't been charged. You can't exonerate innocent people. Mueller worded it that way on purpose so morons like you would have something to play with. Trump is innocent. Until Democrats PROVE he committed a crime, you're all just pissing on our shoes and telling us it's raining.
LOLOL

Nice spin, but Mueller actually said, the evidence did not conclusively rule out criminal conduct in terms of obstruction of justice.
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.
Who knows what you're talking about? He did say what he found.

The 10 instances of possible obstruction in Mueller report
Pitiful little weak bitch.
LOLOL

Your concession is accepted.
You don't like being falsely accused, do you. Sniveling little bitch. We're all wondering just how many children's lives you've ruined.
 
Perhaps the problem lies in our politician;s loyalty to their political party and not to the United States?
 
LOLOL

Nice spin, but Mueller actually said, the evidence did not conclusively rule out criminal conduct in terms of obstruction of justice.
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.
Who knows what you're talking about? He did say what he found.

The 10 instances of possible obstruction in Mueller report
Pitiful little weak bitch.
LOLOL

Your concession is accepted.
You don't like being falsely accused, do you. Sniveling little bitch. We're all wondering just how many children's lives you've ruined.
LOL

Who knows what you're rambling about now? You appear completely unhinged. :cuckoo:
 
So why didn't Mueller say what he had? You really can't see how this works, can you. It's called "smoke and mirrors". Lawyers do this to make people think there's something there when there isn't.
Who knows what you're talking about? He did say what he found.

The 10 instances of possible obstruction in Mueller report
Pitiful little weak bitch.
LOLOL

Your concession is accepted.
You don't like being falsely accused, do you. Sniveling little bitch. We're all wondering just how many children's lives you've ruined.
LOL

Who knows what you're rambling about now? You appear completely unhinged. :cuckoo:
Funny, a Democrat accusing someone of being unhinged.
 
I am fully aware of what happened today, what Trump did, what Trump said. Trump is begging to be impeached, which is exactly my point.

The worst mistake the Democrats could make is to impeach Trump!

In the first place, heading into the 2020 Presidential election, Democrats should not do exactly what their main rival wants them to do.

In the second place, what exactly would be accomplished by impeachment? Some naive congressmen and women think impeachment is an end onto itself. It is not. Impeachment is merely an indictment. The trial takes place in the Trump Republican held Senate where conviction will only happen when pigs can fly. Trump would become a martyr, a victim of Democratic overreach. Why do you think Trump wants to be impeached?

In the third place, these immature lawmakers who think Trump should be impeached should look back on 1998 and the failed impeachment of Bill Clinton which was led by the Republicans. After Clinton was vindicated he became more popular. The pending election was a disaster for the GOP. The Speaker, Newt Gingrich, first lost his post. Months later, he was booted out of the House. That is what impeachment accomplished for the Republicans, and Pelosi and others with more experience remember it well.

In the fourth place, a recent poll showed that only 37% want Trump impeached, probably mostly Republicans. It is Trump's only chance. 60% of Americans oppose impeachment. When asked should Trump be reelected, 60% said no, 37% said yes. Twice in the last two days, two different federal courts have ruled against Trump and in favor of the House Democrats.

What does this mean? It means the Democrats are already winning. Taking into consideration 1998, why risk throwing the election in favor of Trump?

OLC, Tlaib, Omar and others calling for impeachment say that it is a Constitutional duty for the House to impeach Trump. Consider this. The worst possible threat to our Constitution is another four years of the Trump Presidency.

This was illustrated in living color today.
It was so bad that less than two years after Clinton was impeached, Republicans won the presidency and both houses.
 
Who knows what you're rambling about now? You appear completely unhinged. :cuckoo:

The poster also talks in the third person using "we" as if he/she is talking for more than one. He or she may have gotten this idea from a Star Trek episode.
:)-
 

Forum List

Back
Top