SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
- 280
- Banned
- #21
What does your ad hominem have to do with the UK Guardian article?
Funny, I could ask you the same question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does your ad hominem have to do with the UK Guardian article?
The judge's research undoubtedly included this: Teenagers without parental role model are 67% less likely to get a job
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..
Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging
His order won't be overturned because this is a foster child and social services don't need a reason to remove a child. There is no rights to a foster child.
At the same time, there is a right to due process of the law. A judge must act consistent with the law. If there is not valid reason under law to prevent these two people from fostering the child, then they have a case for appeal.
Reality is heartless. Social workers will remove a child from a foster family and place them with another foster family to replace a child that has timed out. They will change the children around to prevent bonding too closely. They don't need a reason.Aren't you a compassionate Christian Conservative.His order won't be overturned because this is a foster child and social services don't need a reason to remove a child. There is no rights to a foster child.
The judge's research undoubtedly included this: Teenagers without parental role model are 67% less likely to get a job
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..
Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging
If this lesbian couple wanted the kid, adopt it. The reason why they are fostering is because they get paid. Adopt and the uncle sugar checks stop.
They want to adopt. An asshole Mormon Taliban judge doesn't want to let them.If this lesbian couple wanted the kid, adopt it. The reason why they are fostering is because they get paid. Adopt and the uncle sugar checks stop.
There IS no rights to a foster child?His order won't be overturned because this is a foster child and social services don't need a reason to remove a child. There is no rights to a foster child.
Agree. I was a foster parent. You don't do it for the money.If this lesbian couple wanted the kid, adopt it. The reason why they are fostering is because they get paid. Adopt and the uncle sugar checks stop.
Oh yeah , $400 a month to care for someones problem kid 24/7! Sign me up!!!
Agree. I was a foster parent. You don't do it for the money.If this lesbian couple wanted the kid, adopt it. The reason why they are fostering is because they get paid. Adopt and the uncle sugar checks stop.
Oh yeah , $400 a month to care for someones problem kid 24/7! Sign me up!!!
by two loving foster parents and some Mormon Taliban judge wants to take that child away because the two parents are women.
The child needs a "more traditional home" according to him.
This has no place in America.
The Christian Taliban claims we want to violate their rights ... yeah their rights to dictate their morality onto the rest of us. Well, that's not a right.
Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com
Fucker, why say something that never happened. That's slander and you are dirty.Nobody can prevent a lesbian couple from having a child... except freaking nature. You almost gotta laugh at the outrage when the same easily outraged left is defending Planned Parenthood for selling murdered human baby body parts.
You may not have done it for the money. You don't speak for all foster parents. Some do it as a business.Agree. I was a foster parent. You don't do it for the money.If this lesbian couple wanted the kid, adopt it. The reason why they are fostering is because they get paid. Adopt and the uncle sugar checks stop.
Oh yeah , $400 a month to care for someones problem kid 24/7! Sign me up!!!
Funny, if I were the emotional type, I'd bury him in a not-so shallow grave, while still alive. Since I am not, I will only point out why in a liberal and secular nation you do not allow men like him to have any control over even small parts of our society...by two loving foster parents and some Mormon Taliban judge wants to take that child away because the two parents are women.
The child needs a "more traditional home" according to him.
This has no place in America.
The Christian Taliban claims we want to violate their rights ... yeah their rights to dictate their morality onto the rest of us. Well, that's not a right.
Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com
No, I'm advocating for judges to know what they are required to base their judgments on, which isn't faith or tradition or homophobia.Funny, if I were the emotional type, I'd bury him in a not-so shallow grave, while still alive. Since I am not, I will only point out why in a liberal and secular nation you do not allow men like him to have any control over even small parts of our society...by two loving foster parents and some Mormon Taliban judge wants to take that child away because the two parents are women.
The child needs a "more traditional home" according to him.
This has no place in America.
The Christian Taliban claims we want to violate their rights ... yeah their rights to dictate their morality onto the rest of us. Well, that's not a right.
Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com
Sounds like you are advocating for the no religious test clause to be removed.
No, I'm advocating for judges to know what they are required to base their judgments on, which isn't faith or tradition or homophobia.Funny, if I were the emotional type, I'd bury him in a not-so shallow grave, while still alive. Since I am not, I will only point out why in a liberal and secular nation you do not allow men like him to have any control over even small parts of our society...by two loving foster parents and some Mormon Taliban judge wants to take that child away because the two parents are women.
The child needs a "more traditional home" according to him.
This has no place in America.
The Christian Taliban claims we want to violate their rights ... yeah their rights to dictate their morality onto the rest of us. Well, that's not a right.
Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com
Sounds like you are advocating for the no religious test clause to be removed.
I want what I said.No, I'm advocating for judges to know what they are required to base their judgments on, which isn't faith or tradition or homophobia.Funny, if I were the emotional type, I'd bury him in a not-so shallow grave, while still alive. Since I am not, I will only point out why in a liberal and secular nation you do not allow men like him to have any control over even small parts of our society...by two loving foster parents and some Mormon Taliban judge wants to take that child away because the two parents are women.
The child needs a "more traditional home" according to him.
This has no place in America.
The Christian Taliban claims we want to violate their rights ... yeah their rights to dictate their morality onto the rest of us. Well, that's not a right.
Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com
Sounds like you are advocating for the no religious test clause to be removed.
Ah. I get it. You want the religious test post election or appointment, for impeachment purposes.
Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..
Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging
Sil is so angsty.