So a foster child is being provided a home

[Eaglewings]

Perhaps the judge should look into these people who have the max foster children just for the paychecks and then go sit on their ass. <<<-------Happens all of the time.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Perhaps the judge should look into these people who have the max foster children just for the paychecks and then go sit on their ass. <<<-------Happens all of the time.

Yeah, that sounds like a judge's job.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Judge orders baby taken away from lesbian foster parents

Good for him.
Safe zone marriages doesn't entitle you corrupt others.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Just wait... the jury is still out on the problems created by raising children in gay households.... I think there's a reason 2 men/women can't conceive children.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Good call imo but I suspect we're headed up the ladder now.

 

[Silhouette]

From the link in this OP: So a foster child is being provided a home | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The original source: Utah judge rules lesbians can't foster a child - CNN.com

The judge I guess is being very tight-lipped about where he got his research from. But I think I can take a stab at it. From the UK Guardian citing the 2010 Prince's Trust Youth Index Survey, the largest of its kind that measures the wellbeing of youth from year to year and seeks to pinpoint issues that are causing unrest in them as they grow from teens to adults:

The judge's research undoubtedly included this: Teenagers without parental role model are 67% less likely to get a job

Young men with no male role models in their lives and women without a mother figure struggle to keep their lives on track, a hard-hitting report warns today. The Prince’s Trust youth index, the largest survey of its kind, found that....67 per cent more likely to be unemployed than their counterparts. They are also significantly more likely to stay unemployed for longer than their peers, the report suggests....It found that young men with no male role model are 50 per cent more likely to abuse drugs and young females in the corresponding position are significantly more likely to drink to excess..

Young men with no male role model to look up to were twice as likely to turn or consider turning to crime as a result of being unemployed...The report, which was based on interviews with 2,170 16 to 25-year-olds...These young men are also three times more likely to feel down or depressed all of the time and significantly more likely to admit that they cannot remember the last time they felt proud...They are also significantly less likely to feel happy and confident than those with male role models, according to the figures....The Prince’s Trust report, which was carried out by YouGov, suggests young people without male role models are more than twice as likely to lack a sense of belonging

In Utah people living together must be married in order to adopt. But this judge has found that even if they are married, what type of marriage it is weighs on how a child will fare under the home.

The problem started when the USSC made the mistake of finding that a behavior = a static race of people. And based on that false premise, awarded just their favorite type of deviant sex practitioners the "right" to marry. Besides that act adding new legislative content and language to the US Constitituion without the approval of the actual legislative Body: Congress, it also set up a situation where the other de facto party to the marriage contract suddenly found themselves in the lurch: children.

Never before had the contract they implicitly and undeniably shared in said "you are now institutionally-deprived of either a mother or father".. Neither children nor their attorneys had a seat at the table this last Spring when the USSC decided for the first time to deprive them of either a mother or father without their, or the consent of their states as guardians' consent. This radical contract revision was missing one of the main parties to the contract. And because it was, a premature and extinguishable decision was made to their detriment.

This judge must also have read the CAPTA laws wherein no state may engage in child abuse or child negligence. In Utah, their state has determined that depriving a child in marriage of either a father or mother is a negligent deprivation. As such, this judge removed a foster daughter from a lesbian home. There will be an appeal of course, and those appeals will make their way up to the USSC to ask them why they did not invite one of the parties to the marriage contract to the revision table. The 5 Justices on the USSC will have to explain to society in their own words why they felt the power to revise such a contract without one of the parties present; and to their researched-detriment.

Perhaps the 5 Justices on the USSC should have done their own research on depriving children of either a mother or father and not made this judge in Utah do it for them.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Judge is wrong, and so are you, of course. Two homophobes in a pod.

 

[boilermaker55]

Care to take the child in fool!
But this is all you have is mindless drivel which permeates from your empty head always.

Good judge.

 

[Disir]

No, he made a reference to research but has failed to cite his source.

OTH, your source has already had the snot kicked out of it every time you post it.

 

[SwimExpert]

Perhaps the judge should look into these people who have the max foster children just for the paychecks and then go sit on their ass. <<<-------Happens all of the time.

The whole thing is a cat-and-mouse affair. There are too many kids who need to be put somewhere. So while you have all these people who foster kids just for the money, you don't have alternatives available.

 

[Pete7469]

Sexual deviants should not have access to children.

Period.

That's how their sickness spreads.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The Judge is wrong, and so are you, of course. Two homophobes in a pod.

The decision is about the child's emotional well being not the judges. A male role model is essential for children.

 

[Silhouette]

The Judge is wrong, and so are you, of course. Two homophobes in a pod.

If it is shown that children experience a negligent situation where they are deprived of either a father or mother, the judge is of course RIGHT. And so am I. The only way you could argue otherwise is to argue that negligence of children's needs is "OK".

Your mistake is you give importance and emphasis to adults' whims and put children's needs below that. I assure you that the way laws are written in all 50 states and federally (CAPTA) it is exactly the opposite. And as this case makes it's way UP, you will see exactly that this is so.

Children aren't pawns. They aren't "going to adapt" to a situation that harms them as a favor to your cult.

 

[boilermaker55]

What is your thoughts about foster parents of opposite sexes that abuse and use children. Such a noble connection. But ones like you don't understand that jury and their verdict. Good one.

Just wait... the jury is still out on the problems created by raising children in gay households.... I think there's a reason 2 men/women can't conceive children.

 

[Disir]

Sexual deviants should not have access to children.

Period.

That's how their sickness spreads.

Except these two women are not sexual deviants.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Judge is wrong, and so are you, of course. Two homophobes in a pod.

The decision is about the child's emotional well being not the judges. A male role model is essential for children.

Nope, but if you want a child raped just put a man in the house, especially if they are unrelated to the child, Happens all the damn time. Nothing would be safer for a little girl than being raised only by women.

 

[rdean]

The Left hates anyone who tries to protect children from a fate worse than death.

Hate what is evil,
Cling to what is good.
Romans 12:9

In other words, you.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Judge is wrong, and so are you, of course. Two homophobes in a pod.

If it is shown that children experience a negligent situation where they are deprived of either a father or mother, the judge is of course RIGHT. And so am I. The only way you could argue otherwise is to argue that negligence of children's needs is "OK".

Your mistake is you give importance and emphasis to adults' whims and put children's needs below that. I assure you that the way laws are written in all 50 states and federally (CAPTA) it is exactly the opposite. And as this case makes it's way UP, you will see exactly that this is so.

Children aren't pawns. They aren't "going to adapt" to a situation that harms them as a favor to your cult.

This country doesn't do what's best for children, and never has. Were that true most people wouldn't be raising children, they are unfit to be parents. Just because you can make a baby doesn't mean you know how or are worthy of raising it...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I think three threads on this is more than enough eh?

 

[Silhouette]

Paint, you know the judge was right.