So here's what I think happened between Kavanaugh & Ford

[Pogo]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

 

[Pogo]

YOU obviously did NOT watch, NOR listen to Senator Whitehouse, during that short, 3 minute video. He fully explians himself, and he ALSO states, "this COULD be."

He dose not state it as fact.

Next time; pay some fucking attention.

I'm done with your dumb ass.

Actually I did watch that little clown show, I thought his request the people listening to him suspend common sense and go along with his fantasy was classic propaganda. (I'm paraphrasing of course). Then he tried to explain away why there were no females listed, I thought that little fantasy was cute. Of course they weren't listed because none were there.

No females were listed because they weren't on his calendar, period. Nobody claimed what's on Brett Kavanaugh's calendar is the complete definitive list of the entire population of a party --- it's just "meet with X, Y and Z". That doesn't preclude A,.B, C, D, E and F from being there too.

So how did he post larger gatherings? Provide an example please.

Dafuck is so hard to understand about this?

Kavanaugh makes an entry that he's meeting (four?) friends at "Timmy's". THAT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY MEAN NOBODY ELSE WILL BE AT "TIMMY'S". It's a calendar of what he is doing ---- not what the entire world is doing.

Not what Kavanaugh said, he said he used it as a diary too, like his dad, so it would be more detailed than that. Since you deflected from my question I'm guess you don't know the answer.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

WHERE does Brett Kavanaugh get dubbed Lord God Decider of who gets to go to "Timmy's"? "Going to Timmy's" in no way means you're deciding WHO ELSE might be "going to Timmy's". Is "Timmy" somehow dependent on Brett Frickin' Kavanaugh to supply his entire guest list? Does Brett Goddam Kavanaugh get final veto power over who gets to "go to Timmy's"? Does "Timmy" have to come before Brett Whizzo Kavanaugh to beg for admission for whoever he lets into his house? Is Timmy so abjectly retarded that he needs Brett Ralph Kavanaugh to do his invitations for him?

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

Having spent four fairly boozy years in college, having been to my share of college parties, and just having a fundamental understanding of that environment, here's what I think happened.

I think he was drunk and he dry humped her for "fun". Stupid, sophomoric, thoughtless, "fun". The mix of booze, testosterone and adrenaline can make a young guy do some pretty stupid shit, and you can DOUBLE that when a buddy is there. He and his buddy laughed about it, and maybe she hid her horror by not acting like she had been attacked. Ask them about it a week later, and they may or may not have remembered it.

Different people (men and women) are sensitive to entirely different things. Clearly this really, profoundly hurt Ford, even though he was clowning around. It wasn't a rape, it wasn't an attempted rape, it was a short, stupid, ignorant act by a drunk kid who was showing off and should have fucking known better. Some women would have laughed it off, some would not, and there is no right or wrong response to it.

Should that disqualify any candidate, three decades later, nominated by a President from either party, for the Supreme Court? Not in my book, but it certainly provides a pretty good excuse for partisans of the opposite party nowadays.

My two cents. Yours?
.

Do you have any other published fictional novels or screenplays for that matter?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Missouri_Mike]

So mr nuthouse zoomed in on a date for no reason at all? How does he know he's even in the right month or year?

.

Senator Whitehouse is a former prosecutor; what fucking rock did you slime from under?

And that's supposed to impress me when he's pulling shit out of the air for no apparent reason, other than 4 guys got together? Were there other similar situations on the calendar that included female friends at the gathering? Nuthouse just pulled this crap out of his ass trying to force Kavanaugh to prove another negative.

.

YOU obviously did NOT watch, NOR listen to Senator Whitehouse, during that short, 3 minute video. He fully explians himself, and he ALSO states, "this COULD be."

He dose not state it as fact.

Next time; pay some fucking attention.

I'm done with your dumb ass.

Actually I did watch that little clown show, I thought his request the people listening to him suspend common sense and go along with his fantasy was classic propaganda. (I'm paraphrasing of course). Then he tried to explain away why there were no females listed, I thought that little fantasy was cute. Of course they weren't listed because none were there.

.

Go look at the successful case % for Senator Whitehouse as a prosecutor.

You people are so full of shit you don't even know when the prison door has been slammed & locked on your poor asses.

It actually makes me question the validity of his cases. This guy is retarded and borderline psycho. And he got to send people to prison? Really?

 

[Auld Phart]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

no

it's ONE day in the life of a teenager, obviously a popular one.

and has NOTHING to do with Ford.

No more than July 14th, July 23rd, August 11th, etc. does.

(But, keep focusing on July 1st, as tho it means something)

 

[Pogo]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

no

it's ONE day in the life of a teenager, obviously a popular one.

and has NOTHING to do with Ford.

No more than July 14th, July 23rd, August 11th, etc. does.

(But, keep focusing on July 1st, as tho it means something)

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

No, didn't think so.

You have any other dates besides July 1st that ALSO fit Ford's description?

Bring 'em on. Could be Rachel Mitchell missed some.

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

No, didn't think so.

 

[Auld Phart]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

 

[talksalot]

Having spent four fairly boozy years in college, having been to my share of college parties, and just having a fundamental understanding of that environment, here's what I think happened.

I think he was drunk and he dry humped her for "fun". Stupid, sophomoric, thoughtless, "fun". The mix of booze, testosterone and adrenaline can make a young guy do some pretty stupid shit, and you can DOUBLE that when a buddy is there. He and his buddy laughed about it, and maybe she hid her horror by not acting like she had been attacked. Ask them about it a week later, and they may or may not have remembered it.

Different people (men and women) are sensitive to entirely different things. Clearly this really, profoundly hurt Ford, even though he was clowning around. It wasn't a rape, it wasn't an attempted rape, it was a short, stupid, ignorant act by a drunk kid who was showing off and should have fucking known better. Some women would have laughed it off, some would not, and there is no right or wrong response to it.

Should that disqualify any candidate, three decades later, nominated by a President from either party, for the Supreme Court? Not in my book, but it certainly provides a pretty good excuse for partisans of the opposite party nowadays.

My two cents. Yours?
.

Ford was supposedly 15 and Kavanaugh 17 when this took place, so it was high school not college and a little young for "chronic boozing."

 

[AZGAL]

It is obvious that the reason that Dr. Ford and lawyers including Debra Katz were begging for Kavanaugh to go first was to trick Kavanaugh into supplying them with crucial information of who, when and where. The accusers only have the what and are missing some needed details to make a better story.

 

[OKTexas]

Actually I did watch that little clown show, I thought his request the people listening to him suspend common sense and go along with his fantasy was classic propaganda. (I'm paraphrasing of course). Then he tried to explain away why there were no females listed, I thought that little fantasy was cute. Of course they weren't listed because none were there.

No females were listed because they weren't on his calendar, period. Nobody claimed what's on Brett Kavanaugh's calendar is the complete definitive list of the entire population of a party --- it's just "meet with X, Y and Z". That doesn't preclude A,.B, C, D, E and F from being there too.

So how did he post larger gatherings? Provide an example please.

Dafuck is so hard to understand about this?

Kavanaugh makes an entry that he's meeting (four?) friends at "Timmy's". THAT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY MEAN NOBODY ELSE WILL BE AT "TIMMY'S". It's a calendar of what he is doing ---- not what the entire world is doing.

Not what Kavanaugh said, he said he used it as a diary too, like his dad, so it would be more detailed than that. Since you deflected from my question I'm guess you don't know the answer.

What the fuck is wrong with you?

WHERE does Brett Kavanaugh get dubbed Lord God Decider of who gets to go to "Timmy's"? "Going to Timmy's" in no way means you're deciding WHO ELSE might be "going to Timmy's". Is "Timmy" somehow dependent on Brett Frickin' Kavanaugh to supply his entire guest list? Does Brett Goddam Kavanaugh get final veto power over who gets to "go to Timmy's"? Does "Timmy" have to come before Brett Whizzo Kavanaugh to beg for admission for whoever he lets into his house? Is Timmy so abjectly retarded that he needs Brett Ralph Kavanaugh to do his invitations for him?

Wow, you might what to go take a cool shower and see if you can soak away your insistence on assuming facts not in evidence. I think I'll side with the only know contemporary record of that evening. BTW in the hearing video he mentioned a date, (Aug 7th I think), where he and some other folks were at Becky's house. He named the guys and girls. So pull your wittle self together and stop believing everything you hear on the commie news network or mslsd.

.

 

[Pogo]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

 

[OKTexas]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

no

it's ONE day in the life of a teenager, obviously a popular one.

and has NOTHING to do with Ford.

No more than July 14th, July 23rd, August 11th, etc. does.

(But, keep focusing on July 1st, as tho it means something)

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

No, didn't think so.

You have any other dates besides July 1st that ALSO fit Ford's description?

Bring 'em on. Could be Rachel Mitchell missed some.

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

No, didn't think so.

Mitchell spent less than 30 seconds on July 1.

.

 

[Pogo]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

no

it's ONE day in the life of a teenager, obviously a popular one.

and has NOTHING to do with Ford.

No more than July 14th, July 23rd, August 11th, etc. does.

(But, keep focusing on July 1st, as tho it means something)

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

No, didn't think so.

You have any other dates besides July 1st that ALSO fit Ford's description?

Bring 'em on. Could be Rachel Mitchell missed some.

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

No, didn't think so.

Mitchell spent less than 30 seconds on July 1.

I know, that's all she needed. Pretty impressive.

Note that in the same line of questioning she also got him to admit that all the entries were his, in his writing, that they had not been changed since 1982, and that he routinely documented such small : "gatherings" which would have included ones like Ford described. In his own words.

He walked right into it. She worked him like a spider.

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

I heard this new accuser is claiming Kavanaugh flashed his penis at her. If true, this is an outrage. Next thing you know, the kids will be drinking and smoking the reefer while listening to that rock music.

 

[OKTexas]

Then WHY are you bringing up that date?

it has NOTHING to do with Ford, unless you have some other proof.

Actually somebody else brought it up, after Sheldon Whitehouse brought it up, after Rachel Mitchell originally brought it up in the hearing on Thursday. That's the all-day video I linked with the time reference to 6h28m where she does bring it up. And it lists the same names that Ford did plus a couple of others.

It's the same exchange where Mitchell asks him if there is any entry on any day in that entire calendar from that summer that could even remotely fit Dr. Ford's description, at which point Kavanaugh responds "no" and bites his lip and looks off to the side. Yet there it is in his own handwriting. The same names --- on a Thursday, a weekday, the kind of day Kavanaugh intentionally tried to shift the focus away from with the premise of "weekends" that Ford never brought up.

THAT is why July 1st is brought up. Because Kavanaugh just got trapped by Rachel Mitchell, his legalistic superior. It's all right there in the video. And that's also the last questioning Rachel Mitchell got to do that day, the committee at that point, with the exposure of the July 1st dated, immediately turning to Lindsey Graham and his tantrum, drawing attention away from the matter of dates and calendars, and plummeting the circus into a grand exercise in Argument from Emotion.

THAT is why July 1st got brought up. Because it's a crucial turning point. And Grassley could see that, and took action to divert it.

no

it's ONE day in the life of a teenager, obviously a popular one.

and has NOTHING to do with Ford.

No more than July 14th, July 23rd, August 11th, etc. does.

(But, keep focusing on July 1st, as tho it means something)

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

No, didn't think so.

You have any other dates besides July 1st that ALSO fit Ford's description?

Bring 'em on. Could be Rachel Mitchell missed some.

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

No, didn't think so.

Mitchell spent less than 30 seconds on July 1.

I know, that's all she needed. Pretty impressive.

Note that in the same line of questioning she also got him to admit that all the entries were his, in his writing, that they had not been changed since 1982, and that he routinely documented such small : "gatherings" which would have included ones like Ford described. In his own words.

He walked right into it. She worked him like a spider.

Damn you're dreaming.

.

 

[Auld Phart]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".

Because it IS funny.

You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

Because Graham had had enough.

That seems pretty obvious.



Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st

(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)

 

[OKTexas]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".

Because it IS funny.

You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

Because Graham had had enough.

That seems pretty obvious.



Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st

(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)

The coward wouldn't even address post 530. Me thinks that yellow streak is showing.

.

 

[Pogo]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".

Because it IS funny.

You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.

As I said, do you have another day that includes the same people and the "skis" in the same setting that perfectly matches Ford's description? If you do, notify the FBI. Rachel Mitchell is a professional prosecutor and that's the date she found but if you have more ---- bring 'em on. I don't.

What the fuck, dood? You have a perfect match and you keep asking "what's the significance". You have a revealing document that immediately gets diverted from and you have no explanation for why it's diverted. Rachel Mitchell is literally never heard from again.

What the fuck dood? How long can you play dumb here?

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

Because Graham had had enough.

That seems pretty obvious.

Graham had been practicing that speech in the hallway during lunch break. Clumsy as it came out, it was scripted. I heard it paraphrased an hour before it got spewed. It was a calculated nuclear option. The only thing left to be decided was when it would be deployed, if it would be deployed at all since it was obviously a desperation maneuver. Once July 1st revealed the same names that Dr. Ford had already cited (remember, Kavanaugh did not watch Ford's testimony) --- the Chair had its "uh-oh" moment and pushed the button.

I'm happy to help you figure out the machinations of how this works but there's really nothing "funny" about it. This is stark, serious stuff.

Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st

(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)

FBI already knows, thanks to Rachel Mitchell. That cat has fled the proverbial bag.

What you need to do is alert the FBI to the dates you have.

 

[Pogo]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".

Because it IS funny.

You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

Because Graham had had enough.

That seems pretty obvious.



Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st

(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)

The coward wouldn't even address post 530. Me thinks that yellow streak is showing.

I tend not to waste my time on posts that contain no intelligent content. 530 is such a post. Have a good cry and then come back with something that actually has meaning.

 

[Auld Phart]

You have entries for July 14th, July 23rd or August 11th that include not only Judge and PJ but "skis"?

Don't need them, but no doubt they are on his calendar.

said meet at timmy's?

There ya go.

Now Ford has a place and time.

Just find timmy, and find out if Ford was there.​

I agree that's a clue as to the setting, and I believe in the video he gave Timmy's last name as well. If I'm the FBI that's on the top of my to-do list. There may be several leads to follow but that's in the forefront. Which is --- AGAIN --- the point of bringing up July 1st.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".
​

You have an explanation for why Rachel Mitchell was suddenly usurped after that point in favor of Graham and the Hissyfit Brigade?

Seems to me Graham got fed up with the total bullshit coming from the left, and decided to read them the riot act.

the rest followed, making Mitchells questions irrevelant

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

You don't have an answer. Actually you do, and it's the same answer I have. You just can't admit to it.

I keep explaining this to you and you keep clicking "funny".

Because it IS funny.

You're basing your entire argument on a date likely picked at random, because it was mid-summer, and listed the names of several of his friends, Mitchell picked it, and the senators parroted it, thinking, like you, something actually happened that day.

As I said, do you have another day that includes the same people and the "skis" in the same setting that perfectly matches Ford's description? If you do, notify the FBI. Rachel Mitchell is a professional prosecutor and that's the date she found but if you have more ---- bring 'em on. I don't.

What the fuck, dood? You have a perfect match and you keep asking "what's the significance". You have a revealing document that immediately gets diverted from and you have no explanation for why it's diverted. Rachel Mitchell is literally never heard from again.

What the fuck dood? How long can you play dumb here?

I just said that's what happened. The question I put to you is why it happened WHEN IT DID.

Because Graham had had enough.

That seems pretty obvious.

Graham had been practicing that speech in the hallway during lunch break. Clumsy as it came out, it was scripted. I heard it paraphrased an hour before it got spewed. It was a calculated nuclear option. The only thing left to be decided was when it would be deployed, if it would be deployed at all since it was obviously a desperation maneuver. Once July 1st revealed the same names that Dr. Ford had already cited (remember, Kavanaugh did not watch Ford's testimony) --- the Chair had its "uh-oh" moment and pushed the button.

I'm happy to help you figure out the machinations of how this works but there's really nothing "funny" about it. This is stark, serious stuff.

Now, send all your investigative work to the FBI, tell them to locate timmy and the boys, and find out if Ford was there July 1st

(you could get a Gold Star, instead of a funny)

FBI already knows, thanks to Rachel Mitchell. That cat has fled the proverbial bag.

What you need to do is alert the FBI to the dates you have.

What the fuck dood? How long can you play dumb here?

I've got all night, to answer your stupid assertions.

Odds are, Mitchell could have put the calendars on a wall, blindfolded herself, threw a dart over her shoulder, and hit a similar date, with similar information.

and you still wouldn't have any proof that is the date Ford is talking about.

How thick is the concrete between your ears.

Quick, get on the phone, and tell the FBI you've broken the case.