So Hillary-Deranged Wingers, How'd You Do For Your Twenty Million Dollars?

That is what Hillary did when she lied to the families that was killed about it being a video.

Quiet nutter. Did you even bother watching? I figure you didn't because your response is simply insane.

I am guessing that you didn't.
Her e-mail sent the very next day to the Egyptian Prime Minister, where she said that Benghazi was not about the video but was an al-Qaeda affiliated attack.
She also said it was an al-Qaeda attack in an e-mail to her daughter.
What some in the nutnoodlery crowd are calling a "smoking gun:"

Clinton_ER_20151022131019.jpg


The email from Hillary Clinton to Chelsea:

“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda-like group,” and expresses sadness and what a hard day it was.

Mrs. Clinton’s 2012 statement : Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet...”

What was reported in the September 12th papers:

"Officials said the assault may have been carried out by an affiliate of al-Qaeda, perhaps seeking to avenge the death of a Libyan who had served as the terrorist group’s No. 2 operative until he was killed in Pakistan in June by a U.S. drone strike."
...
"Preliminary reports speculated that the violence grew spontaneously out of anger over the film. But U.S. and Libyan officials cast doubt on that theory, with some suggesting that the attackers took advantage of the diversion created by protesters."

Libya consulate attack came after militants joined protesters, say witnesses, officials - The Washington Post


You left out the one to the Egyptian Prime Minister where she said it was not about the video.
Rep. Jim Jordan vs. Hillary Clinton: Why Did You Tell Egyptians Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack But Not The American People?

An excellent set of questions (with appropriate pre-question premises and summaries) from the Congressman.

Your post, peach, sharing his contribution to the hearing, and Shrillary's responses, is a great contribution to this thread.

It will be ignored by the USMB liberals and most of America. But it is still very revealing.

you're the only one who thinks the questions were decent. and you shouldn't encourage idiot peachthing, she'll just continue to embarrass herself.

and you really shouldn't be calling me names. you used to be decent. pity you broke after president Obama was elected.
 
You spent twenty million dollars in our tax dollars to get what?

A great showcase for Hillary Clinton to kick your butts and solidify her presidential chances.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Now tell us how we can't afford to feed the hungry and subsidize medical care.

but.... BENGHAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIII!
Lol it cost 1 million not 20 million.

A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.
 
Many of us knew this long ago.

The day after
the 2012 attack, I went to the State Department page that listed every Embassy and Consulate in the world.

There was none listed for Benghazi.

Again, you poor simpleton hack. You MUST consider that the consular office was a temporary one and there is not a doubt that it was used on prior occasions by the now deceased Ambassador.

It was a consulate whether you like that fact or not.
You can keep saying it till the cows come home, and you'll still be wrong.

Even the ARB and Senate investigation noted it as such:

"First, some important context: Although the ambassador was killed, the Benghazi “consulate” was not a consulate at all but basically a secret CIA operation which included an effort to round up shoulder-launched missiles. In fact, only seven of the 30 Americans evacuated from Benghazi had any connection to the State Department; the rest were affiliated with the CIA.

The official reports, such as the one from the Accountability Review Board and the Senate Homeland Security Committee report, essentially dance around that uncomfortable fact:

“In December 2011, the Under Secretary for Management approved a one-year continuation of the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi, which was never a consulate and never formally notified to the Libyan government. (ARB)

“The attacks in Benghazi occurred at two different locations: a Department of State ‘Temporary Mission Facility’ and an Annex facility (‘Annex’) approximately a mile away used by another agency of the United States Government.” (Senate report)"

So, from the State Department perspective, this was an attack on a CIA operation, perhaps by the very people the CIA was battling, and the ambassador tragically was in the wrong place at the wrong time. But, for obvious reasons, the administration could not publicly admit that Benghazi was mostly a secret CIA effort.

An alternative explanation for the Benghazi talking points: Bureaucratic knife fight | Washington Post

You have my permission to keep denying reality. But a consulate is still a consulate even if the CIA used it primarily for those alternative purposes.

I realize that you are impervious to facts and so forth. So, feel free to continue baselessly denying that the Benghazi consulate WAS a consulate. Knock yourself out, paper.
Let see...who to believe. Who to believe. The State Dept. The CIA, the Accountability Review Board and the Senate Investigation that all said it was not a consulate -- or a chimp-faced, Cheetos-fingered welching blowhard on the internet?

Hmmm. Tough choice.

they get easily distracted by shiny objects.
 
You spent twenty million dollars in our tax dollars to get what?

A great showcase for Hillary Clinton to kick your butts and solidify her presidential chances.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Now tell us how we can't afford to feed the hungry and subsidize medical care.

but.... BENGHAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIII!
Lol it cost 1 million not 20 million.

A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.
 
Quiet nutter. Did you even bother watching? I figure you didn't because your response is simply insane.

I am guessing that you didn't.
Her e-mail sent the very next day to the Egyptian Prime Minister, where she said that Benghazi was not about the video but was an al-Qaeda affiliated attack.
She also said it was an al-Qaeda attack in an e-mail to her daughter.
What some in the nutnoodlery crowd are calling a "smoking gun:"

Clinton_ER_20151022131019.jpg


The email from Hillary Clinton to Chelsea:

“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda-like group,” and expresses sadness and what a hard day it was.

Mrs. Clinton’s 2012 statement : Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet...”

What was reported in the September 12th papers:

"Officials said the assault may have been carried out by an affiliate of al-Qaeda, perhaps seeking to avenge the death of a Libyan who had served as the terrorist group’s No. 2 operative until he was killed in Pakistan in June by a U.S. drone strike."
...
"Preliminary reports speculated that the violence grew spontaneously out of anger over the film. But U.S. and Libyan officials cast doubt on that theory, with some suggesting that the attackers took advantage of the diversion created by protesters."

Libya consulate attack came after militants joined protesters, say witnesses, officials - The Washington Post


You left out the one to the Egyptian Prime Minister where she said it was not about the video.
Rep. Jim Jordan vs. Hillary Clinton: Why Did You Tell Egyptians Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack But Not The American People?

An excellent set of questions (with appropriate pre-question premises and summaries) from the Congressman.

Your post, peach, sharing his contribution to the hearing, and Shrillary's responses, is a great contribution to this thread.

It will be ignored by the USMB liberals and most of America. But it is still very revealing.

you're the only one who thinks the questions were decent. and you shouldn't encourage idiot peachthing, she'll just continue to embarrass herself.

and you really shouldn't be calling me names. you used to be decent. pity you broke after president Obama was elected.

Wrong jilly. I didn't say the questions were "decent." They were in fact excellent. Can you see the difference in those two words? I just knew you could.

And obviously you are also flatly wrong in claiming that I am the "only one" who thinks so. In fact, I was just thanking the person who shared them! Even YOU ought to be able to see that this means I'm not the "only" one.

You have been decent in the past. Now, much like Bubba's alleged wife, you have become a bit shrill.

And of course I should be calling you names. When you say imbecilic bullshit things (as you are so prone to doing) you deserve to be heavily poked, prodded and called-out on them. Say somethings as massively stupid as many of your posts do, as often as you do, and sooner or later, you get the stink of that stupidity all over you.

<<sniff, sniff >>

Eeeeww.
 
You spent twenty million dollars in our tax dollars to get what?

A great showcase for Hillary Clinton to kick your butts and solidify her presidential chances.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Now tell us how we can't afford to feed the hungry and subsidize medical care.

but.... BENGHAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIII!

I'm not obsessed with Hillary but neither am I (nor the majority of Americans) impressed with her character. That she might gain politically from the hearings is more a function of American politics than anything she has done or said. Had our gov't not made this effort, a legit cry of preferential injustice would have been the result and the stench would have destroyed her politically.

The seed, however, has been planted in our collective mind and no more need be said to give most Americans pause.

Her fate now hinges on the Repub's ability (or inability) to field an acceptable alternative. A Rubio/Sanders or Rubio/Fiorina ticket could tip the scale.

From yesterday's Chicago Tribune:

"In the Quinnipiac poll, her honesty/trustworthy score (32 percent say she is, 63 percent say she is not) is worse than Donald Trump's (35 percent to 57 percent) among voters surveyed. Clinton is also in negative territory in terms of overall favorability (41 percent favorable, 55 percent unfavorable)."

Will Hillary Clinton implode?

no one who supports reproductive choice, social justice and decent judges will vote for a GOP candidate until you dump your right flank of shrieking loons.

true story.

and what's most amusing, and I find it odd, really, is that the right can't comprehend that normal people don't hate Hillary or this president the way they do. so don't get what they're insanely ranting about.

to me, baby bush's character, in lying us into war and being responsible for the murder of thousands of people shows far more moral weakness. but I guess it depends on your priorities.....
 
You spent twenty million dollars in our tax dollars to get what?

A great showcase for Hillary Clinton to kick your butts and solidify her presidential chances.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Now tell us how we can't afford to feed the hungry and subsidize medical care.

but.... BENGHAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIII!
Lol it cost 1 million not 20 million.

A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...
 
and you really shouldn't be calling me names. you used to be decent.


naah not really.. angrysockboi only ACTS decent when he wants something

Valeravi is all in a snit. :lol:

Is it PMS, bitch, or have you gone past the sold by date?

Also, shit head, I am not a "sock." Don't you realize even by THIS time that words have meaning, you mindless fucktard?
 
I am guessing that you didn't.
Her e-mail sent the very next day to the Egyptian Prime Minister, where she said that Benghazi was not about the video but was an al-Qaeda affiliated attack.
She also said it was an al-Qaeda attack in an e-mail to her daughter.
What some in the nutnoodlery crowd are calling a "smoking gun:"

Clinton_ER_20151022131019.jpg


The email from Hillary Clinton to Chelsea:

“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda-like group,” and expresses sadness and what a hard day it was.

Mrs. Clinton’s 2012 statement : Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet...”

What was reported in the September 12th papers:

"Officials said the assault may have been carried out by an affiliate of al-Qaeda, perhaps seeking to avenge the death of a Libyan who had served as the terrorist group’s No. 2 operative until he was killed in Pakistan in June by a U.S. drone strike."
...
"Preliminary reports speculated that the violence grew spontaneously out of anger over the film. But U.S. and Libyan officials cast doubt on that theory, with some suggesting that the attackers took advantage of the diversion created by protesters."

Libya consulate attack came after militants joined protesters, say witnesses, officials - The Washington Post


You left out the one to the Egyptian Prime Minister where she said it was not about the video.
Rep. Jim Jordan vs. Hillary Clinton: Why Did You Tell Egyptians Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack But Not The American People?

An excellent set of questions (with appropriate pre-question premises and summaries) from the Congressman.

Your post, peach, sharing his contribution to the hearing, and Shrillary's responses, is a great contribution to this thread.

It will be ignored by the USMB liberals and most of America. But it is still very revealing.

you're the only one who thinks the questions were decent. and you shouldn't encourage idiot peachthing, she'll just continue to embarrass herself.

and you really shouldn't be calling me names. you used to be decent. pity you broke after president Obama was elected.

Wrong jilly. I didn't say the questions were "decent." They were in fact excellent. Can you see the difference in those two words? I just knew you could.

And obviously you are also flatly wrong in claiming that I am the "only one" who thinks so. In fact, I was just thanking the person who shared them! Even YOU ought to be able to see that this means I'm not the "only" one.

You have been decent in the past. Now, much like Bubba's alleged wife, you have become a bit shrill.

And of course I should be calling you names. When you say imbecilic bullshit things (as you are so prone to doing) you deserve to be heavily poked, prodded and called-out on them. Say somethings as massively stupid as many of your posts do, as often as you do, and sooner or later, you get the stink of that stupidity all over you.

<<sniff, sniff >>

Eeeeww.

the questions were imbecilic. they proved nothing. made her look better than she looked prior and added nothing to previous hearings.

you should know better.

but you don't.

you've become a moron on top of being a welcher....

I feel sorry for you. you've become pathetic.
 
You spent twenty million dollars in our tax dollars to get what?

A great showcase for Hillary Clinton to kick your butts and solidify her presidential chances.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Now tell us how we can't afford to feed the hungry and subsidize medical care.

but.... BENGHAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIII!
Lol it cost 1 million not 20 million.

A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...

The troofer speaks the troof. You're full of shite. You should be ashamed of yourself licking Hillary Clinton boots.
 
Lol it cost 1 million not 20 million.

A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...

The troofer speaks the troof. You're full of shite. You should be ashamed of yourself licking Hillary Clinton boots.

ok, loony toon. :cuckoo:

I think you should keep stamping your widdle feet and drooling all over your keyboard.

also, be careful.... your tinfoil hat is too tight.
 
Many of us knew this long ago.

The day after
the 2012 attack, I went to the State Department page that listed every Embassy and Consulate in the world.

There was none listed for Benghazi.

Again, you poor simpleton hack. You MUST consider that the consular office was a temporary one and there is not a doubt that it was used on prior occasions by the now deceased Ambassador.

It was a consulate whether you like that fact or not.
You can keep saying it till the cows come home, and you'll still be wrong.

Even the ARB and Senate investigation noted it as such:

"First, some important context: Although the ambassador was killed, the Benghazi “consulate” was not a consulate at all but basically a secret CIA operation which included an effort to round up shoulder-launched missiles. In fact, only seven of the 30 Americans evacuated from Benghazi had any connection to the State Department; the rest were affiliated with the CIA.

The official reports, such as the one from the Accountability Review Board and the Senate Homeland Security Committee report, essentially dance around that uncomfortable fact:

“In December 2011, the Under Secretary for Management approved a one-year continuation of the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi, which was never a consulate and never formally notified to the Libyan government. (ARB)

“The attacks in Benghazi occurred at two different locations: a Department of State ‘Temporary Mission Facility’ and an Annex facility (‘Annex’) approximately a mile away used by another agency of the United States Government.” (Senate report)"

So, from the State Department perspective, this was an attack on a CIA operation, perhaps by the very people the CIA was battling, and the ambassador tragically was in the wrong place at the wrong time. But, for obvious reasons, the administration could not publicly admit that Benghazi was mostly a secret CIA effort.

An alternative explanation for the Benghazi talking points: Bureaucratic knife fight | Washington Post

You have my permission to keep denying reality. But a consulate is still a consulate even if the CIA used it primarily for those alternative purposes.

I realize that you are impervious to facts and so forth. So, feel free to continue baselessly denying that the Benghazi consulate WAS a consulate. Knock yourself out, paper.
Let see...who to believe. Who to believe. The State Dept. The CIA, the Accountability Review Board and the Senate Investigation that all said it was not a consulate -- or a chimp-faced, Cheetos-fingered welching blowhard on the internet?

Hmmm. Tough choice.

It seems very important to you that the consulate not be called a consulate.

Interesting.

But the very same government you make reference to ALSO did call it a consulate. Hm.

Whom to believe. The government when it agrees with me or the government when it contradicts itself and says the other thing?

Hm.

Worry about the bloviating "opinion" a nitwit like paper who makes claims devoid of truth or -- not?

Let's go with "not."
 
A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...

The troofer speaks the troof. You're full of shite. You should be ashamed of yourself licking Hillary Clinton boots.

ok, loony toon. :cuckoo:

I think you should keep stamping your widdle feet and drooling all over your keyboard.

also, be careful.... your tinfoil hat is too tight.

Ha, you Clinton Bootlickers are pretty pathetic. All you can do is defend the indefensible. Not an enviable position. But hey, good luck with that.
 
A Democrat wingnut complaining about Government spending? Wow! Come on? The OP is very disingenuous and hypocritical.

i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...

The troofer speaks the troof. You're full of shite. You should be ashamed of yourself licking Hillary Clinton boots.

ok, loony toon. :cuckoo:

I think you should keep stamping your widdle feet and drooling all over your keyboard.

also, be careful.... your tinfoil hat is too tight.
I challenge you to make one post without calling someone stupid.
 
Valeravi is all in a snit. :lol:

Is it PMS, bitch, or have you gone past the sold by date?

Also, shit head, I am not a "sock." Don't you realize even by THIS time that words have meaning, you mindless fucktard?


all that denial while falsely claiming that i am ravi's sock..

just when i thought you couldn't be any more of a fraud :itsok:
 
and you really shouldn't be calling me names. you used to be decent.


naah not really.. angrysockboi only ACTS decent when he wants something

are they still socks when everyone knows who they are?

he's become stupid... I think it's the brain rot that occurs with Obama derangement syndrome.

Sorry, jilly, but "sock" is a word that has an actual meaning (one that doesn't apply in this case) and you cannot alter the meaning just because it's kind of inconvenient for you.

valeravie is just a dishonest twat. No big deal. You lower yourself even further by taking up for her.

By the way, one doesn't become stupid by recognizing that Obumbler is a disaster as President. One can, in many cases, however, REMAIN stupid by continuing to defend his Presidency as something that warrants praise.
 
i'm for spending it on reasonable things.

lol being called a wingnut by a conspiracy theorist goon.

Yup, you're concerned with Government spending. And you care about the Rule of Law too, huh? Come on man! We know you wingnuts better than that. I mean, you're Hillary Clinton supporters for God's sake. Go away.

yah... the troofer speaks. lmao...

The troofer speaks the troof. You're full of shite. You should be ashamed of yourself licking Hillary Clinton boots.

ok, loony toon. :cuckoo:

I think you should keep stamping your widdle feet and drooling all over your keyboard.

also, be careful.... your tinfoil hat is too tight.
I challenge you to make one post without calling someone stupid.

Ha, she's getting desperate and shrill now. She knows she's defending the indefensible. Hillary Clinton is a very bad person who shouldn't be our President. And deep down, even her most loyal bootlickers know that. Hopefully, America will say no. I think they will.
 
Valeravi is all in a snit. :lol:

Is it PMS, bitch, or have you gone past the sold by date?

Also, shit head, I am not a "sock." Don't you realize even by THIS time that words have meaning, you mindless fucktard?


all that denial while falsely claiming that i am ravi's sock..

just when i thought you couldn't be any more of a fraud :itsok:

See? I SAID you were all in a snit. And you promptly confirmed it.

Sucks to be you. Of course, it has always sucked to be you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top