Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateIt happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. SadThe part where they lie and spin and in some cases crash the stock market. That part. The real question is not what part is fake but why do so many fools believe it all?
"Lie and spin and in some cases crash the stock market"? When was the last time that the stock market took a dive because of the news spin?
Quick answer...............it hasn't. At least, not if you believe Trump saying that he's responsible for the stock markets continuous rise.
Link? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
No asshole. My point was the BULLSHIT actually hurt the stock market. It had to climb back up. If tax reform wasnt involved, it would have been worse.Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateIt happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. Sad"Lie and spin and in some cases crash the stock market"? When was the last time that the stock market took a dive because of the news spin?
Quick answer...............it hasn't. At least, not if you believe Trump saying that he's responsible for the stock markets continuous rise.
Link? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
I said it got "hurt" not crashed. More fake news
No asshole. My point was the BULLSHIT actually hurt the stock market. It had to climb back up. If tax reform wasnt involved, it would have been worse.Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateIt happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. Sad
Link? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
I said it got "hurt" not crashed. More fake news
The news definitely caused a severe drop.
You've proved your point
No asshole. My point was the BULLSHIT actually hurt the stock market. It had to climb back up. If tax reform wasnt involved, it would have been worse.Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateIt happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. Sad
Link? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
I said it got "hurt" not crashed. More fake news
I never said that you said it crashed. MikeTX is the one who said the market "crashed", and I asked when.
And no..................what the stock market does during the day isn't what matters. What matters is how it closes. 41 point drop isn't really "hurting" anything either.
No asshole. My point was the BULLSHIT actually hurt the stock market. It had to climb back up. If tax reform wasnt involved, it would have been worse.Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateIt happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. Sad
Link? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
I said it got "hurt" not crashed. More fake news
The news definitely caused a severe drop.
You've proved your point
Some, like you, are retards. But not that many. Note that the assholes that illegally occupied the Malhuer Reserve could not get a single local rancher to sign on to their bullshit propositions. And the majority of people in Harney County just wanted to see the miscreants gone.He actually didn't give that land back to the state.BREAKING NEWS :
President Trump decides to give more Federal land back to the state, where it should be. Ergo, he is building a planet size gas capturing device and plans on destroying the sun so only rich people will have daylight.
He just released it back to usfs and blm. Still federal. That's why this whole issue is so asinine. Nobody has a clue what's going on, except the people who live in rural areas.
And THOSE people are portrayed as retards.
Well there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BSCNN for all their faults beats the crap out of liars at FOXand my gawd man.... The MSM is a fucking disaster.
Trump JR and the wikileaks email
Flynn
deutsche bank
Trumps rally in florida
Then look at this bullshit
Trump’s 'fake news' mantra a hit with despots
‘Fake News,’ Trump’s Obsession, Is Now a Cudgel for Strongmen
SMH
Whats real bad is, CNN said their "fact checking team" found the wikileaks thing to be 100% accurate.. Why in the hell should we pay attention to them?
Fact is, they dont give a shit about fact checking.. They just want to rile up the trump haters.. I mean, is that not obvious? Or are they just that incompetent?
Sure, we can tell from the ratings...dumbass.
Cable News Ratings: Fox News Breaks Records, MSNBC Posts Significant Growth
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
No asshole. My point was the BULLSHIT actually hurt the stock market. It had to climb back up. If tax reform wasnt involved, it would have been worse.Wall Street rocked by Michael Flynn, tax debateLink? How much did it drop?
From your link......................
At one point the Dow plunged 350 points after ABC News reported that Flynn is prepared to testify that President Trump "as a candidate" directed him to make contact with Russians. ABC later clarified the report, saying that Trump did not tell Flynn to reach out to Russia during the campaign.
Stocks raced back on signs that Republicans may have enough votes to pass the tax bill. In the end, the Dow closed only 41 points lower.
You said the stock market crashed, but it only closed 41 points lower. That is statistically insignificant. Large drops during trading happen, sometimes they are even caused by a computer glitch. But, it's how the stock market closes that determines how it did for that day.
Try again.
I said it got "hurt" not crashed. More fake news
I never said that you said it crashed. MikeTX is the one who said the market "crashed", and I asked when.
And no..................what the stock market does during the day isn't what matters. What matters is how it closes. 41 point drop isn't really "hurting" anything either.
Of course it matters what happens during the day. Traders buy and sell on fluctuations
Good grief
Look thinker use your head Everyone knows that FOX wins prizes for the biggest bullshit on the air and sure, we know folks like you are attracted to itWell there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BSCNN for all their faults beats the crap out of liars at FOX
Sure, we can tell from the ratings...dumbass.
Cable News Ratings: Fox News Breaks Records, MSNBC Posts Significant Growth
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
So what would you like to do, add up the credibility of all networks.
Trolling again I see.It happened last week. ABC released that bullshit about flynn and the stock market got hurt. People actually lost money over it.. SadThe part where they lie and spin and in some cases crash the stock market. That part. The real question is not what part is fake but why do so many fools believe it all?and my gawd man.... The MSM is a fucking disaster.
Trump JR and the wikileaks email
Flynn
deutsche bank
...what about them? What part do you claim is "fake"?
"Lie and spin and in some cases crash the stock market"? When was the last time that the stock market took a dive because of the news spin?
Quick answer...............it hasn't. At least, not if you believe Trump saying that he's responsible for the stock markets continuous rise.
Link? How much did it drop?
Well there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BSCNN for all their faults beats the crap out of liars at FOX
Sure, we can tell from the ratings...dumbass.
Cable News Ratings: Fox News Breaks Records, MSNBC Posts Significant Growth
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
So what would you like to do, add up the credibility of all networks.
The forum grammar nazi. how kute and pridicktable. You must be very smrt.Well there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BSSure, we can tell from the ratings...dumbass.
Cable News Ratings: Fox News Breaks Records, MSNBC Posts Significant Growth
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
So what would you like to do, add up the credibility of all networks.
First thing I'd like to do is traffic in complete English sentences, which this isn't.
I simply defined what "ratings" means. It has nothing to do with any kind of "veracity". Never did, never will.
Well there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BSSure, we can tell from the ratings...dumbass.
Cable News Ratings: Fox News Breaks Records, MSNBC Posts Significant Growth
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
So what would you like to do, add up the credibility of all networks.
First thing I'd like to do is traffic in complete English sentences, which this isn't.
I simply defined what "ratings" means. It has nothing to do with any kind of "veracity". Never did, never will.
The OP thread evidences a low level HS education and almost no college.
The statement suggests that personal belief is objective reality.
When you say studies you mean polls. Polls are great anren't they?You know, American Idol and America's Got Talent have high ratings.
Stuff that shows up on things like the History Channel, Discovery, or Science Channel rarely gets high ratings.
But, the stuff on the learning channels has actual facts and history that I can learn. AI and AGT don't.
So what if FOX news has high ratings? There have been studies that show they are accurate only 60 percent of the time.
Got anything to say about all dictators using the trump BS FAKE NEWS?Well there's a reason for that moron Many stations for real news while only FOX and a couple more where idiots like you can go Add up CNN ratings and all other real news networks and then add FOX and the other dummies Tell us then about your ratings BS
Add up CNN ratings and all others...WTF, you cited CNN...dumbass.
"Ratings" have nothing to do with "credibility". If they did, WWE would not exist, now would it?
Ratings measure attention. Nothing else. They have one purpose and one purpose only, which is to set rates for commercial time. HOW they garner that attention is a wide open field.
So what would you like to do, add up the credibility of all networks.
First thing I'd like to do is traffic in complete English sentences, which this isn't.
I simply defined what "ratings" means. It has nothing to do with any kind of "veracity". Never did, never will.
You'd like to traffic in complete sentences....guess there's a first time for just about everything.
