So, lets review what 2 weeks of Trump have done for us....

I did read the post... I'm talking about gun free school zones and I mentioned how they were innocent citizens... so to your comment, please tell me how many kids are packing heat at schools.
I'm not dicussing children carrying guns; and you know it. Stay on course, or be ignored for the remainder of this thread. I don't fall for leftist attempts to change the topic. Nor do I tolerate it...

I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

You can leave your gun at home when you visit little Jim Bobs teacher





.
 
Last edited:
I'm not dicussing children carrying guns; and you know it. Stay on course, or be ignored for the remainder of this thread. I don't fall for leftist attempts to change the topic. Nor do I tolerate it...

I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

You can leave your gun at home when you visit little Jim Bobs teacher
I could also denounce my faith at the door; surrender all my assets to the government; and cooperatively subject myself to painful violent interrogation, before I head in... You first.
 
On domestic policies, we can all "rejoice" that:

1. Mexico is NOT paying for any "beautiful wall" and that even right wingers in congress can come up with the money for US taxpayers to build this campaign lie (fiasco.)

2. The ACA is such a hot potato that now, the term "replace" is being revised to the term "re-work" (which is fine by me.

3. Those poor, picked on banks and wall street investors can restart their cheating on mortgages and retirement plans.

4. Those coal mining outfits can now pollute river and streams to their heart content.

5. People wit mental health issues can "safely" buy assault weapons because.....well, because gun manufacturers and the NRA need the business and screw kids and others from massacres by "troubled" Americans

On the foreign front, our beloved Trump is goading Iran and telling our allies that if they didn't think that he was a childish bully before, he is here to put that doubt to rest.....

If right wingers think they're winners, they're dumber than we had previously thought.

ALWAYS REMEMBER RIGHT WINGERS ....don't label yourself the popular majority....you're not.
We're in charge. End of story...

You're in charge? I think not. An orange-faced national embarassment is in charge. He's is offending your friends and offering comfort to your enemies.

While Trump is provoking Iran, what do you think that's going to do for Iran's great friend, Vladimir Putin?

Not even in office for two weeks and already Donnie's flexing your muscle in the Middle East. Send in patrol boats, issuing sanctions, threatening Iran.

So much for peace and prosperity.
 
Hysterical "comedy" as we "watch the left" melt down "in" massive butt hurt

You forgot to include,"snowflake" "dimocrap" and "communist".....Hannity will be pissed at you. LOL
 
I did read the post... I'm talking about gun free school zones and I mentioned how they were innocent citizens... so to your comment, please tell me how many kids are packing heat at schools.
I'm not dicussing children carrying guns; and you know it. Stay on course, or be ignored for the remainder of this thread. I don't fall for leftist attempts to change the topic. Nor do I tolerate it...

I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

Ok let me ask you a simple yes or no question... if there are no people carrying guns in a gun free zone around a school, do the chances of an innocent child getting shot by a gun by a criminal or a law abiding citizen using a gun against a criminal go down?
 
I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

You can leave your gun at home when you visit little Jim Bobs teacher
I could also denounce my faith at the door; surrender all my assets to the government; and cooperatively subject myself to painful violent interrogation, before I head in... You first.

Shit yea

You need your gun in case that teacher tries to smack your knuckles with a ruler. Gotta keep her in her place
 
So, lets review what 2 weeks of Trump have done for us....

Hysterical "comedy" as we "watch the left" melt down "in" massive butt hurt

"Hysterical comendy" as Angle Merkel takes over as the leader of the free world, TrumpleThinkSkin allienates your friends and allies, and makes a total fool of himself in front of the rest of the world.

He's only been in power for two weeks and already the US has been relegated to a second class power as it withdraws from the rest of the civilized world and sinks further into racism and zenophobia. The United States of America is no longer the voice of moral authority in the world, and has to be reminded that it has an obligation to take in refugees under the Geneva Convention, and the UN Charter.

As the US cancels trade partnerships, China stands at the ready to fill the vacuum in world power being created by the US, and Russia is expanding its incursion into the Ukraine. Since the Ukraine is in no position to pay for its defense, they're on their own and Russia can continue to build its empire.
 
Trump is merely acting as an extension of the will of the people who put him there. And no. Its not the Russians. It millions of Americans just like me who've had as much, as we're willing to take of the leftists bullshit. So yeah by extention, I am in charge. Along with millions of others much like myself, who you will not like any better...
 
On domestic policies, we can all "rejoice" that:

1. Mexico is NOT paying for any "beautiful wall" and that even right wingers in congress can come up with the money for US taxpayers to build this campaign lie (fiasco.)

2. The ACA is such a hot potato that now, the term "replace" is being revised to the term "re-work" (which is fine by me.

3. Those poor, picked on banks and wall street investors can restart their cheating on mortgages and retirement plans.

4. Those coal mining outfits can now pollute river and streams to their heart content.

5. People wit mental health issues can "safely" buy assault weapons because.....well, because gun manufacturers and the NRA need the business and screw kids and others from massacres by "troubled" Americans

On the foreign front, our beloved Trump is goading Iran and telling our allies that if they didn't think that he was a childish bully before, he is here to put that doubt to rest.....

If right wingers think they're winners, they're dumber than we had previously thought.

ALWAYS REMEMBER RIGHT WINGERS ....don't label yourself the popular majority....you're not.
We're in charge. End of story...

You're in charge? I think not. An orange-faced national embarassment is in charge. He's is offending your friends and offering comfort to your enemies.

While Trump is provoking Iran, what do you think that's going to do for Iran's great friend, Vladimir Putin?

Not even in office for two weeks and already Donnie's flexing your muscle in the Middle East. Send in patrol boats, issuing sanctions, threatening Iran.

So much for peace and prosperity.


The fact that you think you are in charge because you voted Trump and he is making decisions right now is extremely scary, and makes me question whether you are mentally stable enough to carry a gun. Honestly.
 
I'm not dicussing children carrying guns; and you know it. Stay on course, or be ignored for the remainder of this thread. I don't fall for leftist attempts to change the topic. Nor do I tolerate it...

I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

Ok let me ask you a simple yes or no question... if there are no people carrying guns in a gun free zone around a school, do the chances of an innocent child getting shot by a gun by a criminal or a law abiding citizen using a gun against a criminal go down?
If we outlaw public schooling; do the odds of a child being shot at public school go down?
 
On domestic policies, we can all "rejoice" that:

1. Mexico is NOT paying for any "beautiful wall" and that even right wingers in congress can come up with the money for US taxpayers to build this campaign lie (fiasco.)

2. The ACA is such a hot potato that now, the term "replace" is being revised to the term "re-work" (which is fine by me.

3. Those poor, picked on banks and wall street investors can restart their cheating on mortgages and retirement plans.

4. Those coal mining outfits can now pollute river and streams to their heart content.

5. People wit mental health issues can "safely" buy assault weapons because.....well, because gun manufacturers and the NRA need the business and screw kids and others from massacres by "troubled" Americans

On the foreign front, our beloved Trump is goading Iran and telling our allies that if they didn't think that he was a childish bully before, he is here to put that doubt to rest.....

If right wingers think they're winners, they're dumber than we had previously thought.

ALWAYS REMEMBER RIGHT WINGERS ....don't label yourself the popular majority....you're not.
We're in charge. End of story...

You're in charge? I think not. An orange-faced national embarassment is in charge. He's is offending your friends and offering comfort to your enemies.

While Trump is provoking Iran, what do you think that's going to do for Iran's great friend, Vladimir Putin?

Not even in office for two weeks and already Donnie's flexing your muscle in the Middle East. Send in patrol boats, issuing sanctions, threatening Iran.

So much for peace and prosperity.


The fact that you think you are in charge because you voted Trump and he is making decisions right now is extremely scary, and makes me question whether you are mentally stable enough to carry a gun. Honestly.
Honestly... Your opinion on the matter means nothing... Nothing at all..
 
So, lets review what 2 weeks of Trump have done for us....

Hysterical "comedy" as we "watch the left" melt down "in" massive butt hurt

"Hysterical comendy" as Angle Merkel takes over as the leader of the free world, TrumpleThinkSkin allienates your friends and allies, and makes a total fool of himself in front of the rest of the world.

He's only been in power for two weeks and already the US has been relegated to a second class power as it withdraws from the rest of the civilized world and sinks further into racism and zenophobia. The United States of America is no longer the voice of moral authority in the world, and has to be reminded that it has an obligation to take in refugees under the Geneva Convention, and the UN Charter.

As the US cancels trade partnerships, China stands at the ready to fill the vacuum in world power being created by the US, and Russia is expanding its incursion into the Ukraine. Since the Ukraine is in no position to pay for its defense, they're on their own and Russia can continue to build its empire.

This is all just stupid. You're brainwashed by the left
 
I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

Ok let me ask you a simple yes or no question... if there are no people carrying guns in a gun free zone around a school, do the chances of an innocent child getting shot by a gun by a criminal or a law abiding citizen using a gun against a criminal go down?
If we outlaw public schooling; do the odds of a child being shot at public school go down?

So you avoided my question and asked an absurd question in return. Congrats for being ignorant.
 
On domestic policies, we can all "rejoice" that:

1. Mexico is NOT paying for any "beautiful wall" and that even right wingers in congress can come up with the money for US taxpayers to build this campaign lie (fiasco.)

2. The ACA is such a hot potato that now, the term "replace" is being revised to the term "re-work" (which is fine by me.

3. Those poor, picked on banks and wall street investors can restart their cheating on mortgages and retirement plans.

4. Those coal mining outfits can now pollute river and streams to their heart content.

5. People wit mental health issues can "safely" buy assault weapons because.....well, because gun manufacturers and the NRA need the business and screw kids and others from massacres by "troubled" Americans

On the foreign front, our beloved Trump is goading Iran and telling our allies that if they didn't think that he was a childish bully before, he is here to put that doubt to rest.....

If right wingers think they're winners, they're dumber than we had previously thought.

ALWAYS REMEMBER RIGHT WINGERS ....don't label yourself the popular majority....you're not.
We're in charge. End of story...

You're in charge? I think not. An orange-faced national embarassment is in charge. He's is offending your friends and offering comfort to your enemies.

While Trump is provoking Iran, what do you think that's going to do for Iran's great friend, Vladimir Putin?

Not even in office for two weeks and already Donnie's flexing your muscle in the Middle East. Send in patrol boats, issuing sanctions, threatening Iran.

So much for peace and prosperity.


The fact that you think you are in charge because you voted Trump and he is making decisions right now is extremely scary, and makes me question whether you are mentally stable enough to carry a gun. Honestly.
Honestly... Your opinion on the matter means nothing... Nothing at all..

I'm pretty sure many others on this forum would agree with me. If you are suffering from illusions of grandeur you don't need to be allowed to possess a firearm.
 
Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.

A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

Ok let me ask you a simple yes or no question... if there are no people carrying guns in a gun free zone around a school, do the chances of an innocent child getting shot by a gun by a criminal or a law abiding citizen using a gun against a criminal go down?
If we outlaw public schooling; do the odds of a child being shot at public school go down?

So you avoided my question and asked an absurd question in return. Congrats for being ignorant.

The answer to your question is the odds of the child getting shot go up.

And seriously, you actually think it's safer for a child to have only the criminal have a gun? That's stupid
 
So, lets review what 2 weeks of Trump have done for us....

Hysterical "comedy" as we "watch the left" melt down "in" massive butt hurt

"Hysterical comendy" as Angle Merkel takes over as the leader of the free world, TrumpleThinkSkin allienates your friends and allies, and makes a total fool of himself in front of the rest of the world.

He's only been in power for two weeks and already the US has been relegated to a second class power as it withdraws from the rest of the civilized world and sinks further into racism and zenophobia. The United States of America is no longer the voice of moral authority in the world, and has to be reminded that it has an obligation to take in refugees under the Geneva Convention, and the UN Charter.

As the US cancels trade partnerships, China stands at the ready to fill the vacuum in world power being created by the US, and Russia is expanding its incursion into the Ukraine. Since the Ukraine is in no position to pay for its defense, they're on their own and Russia can continue to build its empire.

This is all just stupid. You're brainwashed by the left


Coming from someone that started a thread about how they would divide the United States to separate Conservatives from Liberals...
 
A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.

Ok let me ask you a simple yes or no question... if there are no people carrying guns in a gun free zone around a school, do the chances of an innocent child getting shot by a gun by a criminal or a law abiding citizen using a gun against a criminal go down?
If we outlaw public schooling; do the odds of a child being shot at public school go down?

So you avoided my question and asked an absurd question in return. Congrats for being ignorant.

The answer to your question is the odds of the child getting shot go up.

And seriously, you actually think it's safer for a child to have only the criminal have a gun? That's stupid


You failed the Philosophy and Logic course I see...
 
We're in charge. End of story...

You're in charge? I think not. An orange-faced national embarassment is in charge. He's is offending your friends and offering comfort to your enemies.

While Trump is provoking Iran, what do you think that's going to do for Iran's great friend, Vladimir Putin?

Not even in office for two weeks and already Donnie's flexing your muscle in the Middle East. Send in patrol boats, issuing sanctions, threatening Iran.

So much for peace and prosperity.


The fact that you think you are in charge because you voted Trump and he is making decisions right now is extremely scary, and makes me question whether you are mentally stable enough to carry a gun. Honestly.
Honestly... Your opinion on the matter means nothing... Nothing at all..

I'm pretty sure many others on this forum would agree with me. If you are suffering from illusions of grandeur you don't need to be allowed to possess a firearm.

Funny how criminals don't follow gun laws and don't respect gun free zones. In fact shooters have been repeatedly attracted to them. Why do you suppose that is?
 

Forum List

Back
Top