rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 287,334
- 165,781
I/we are discussing the basis for the gun free zones existence. Not what happens when someone runs afoul of established law.Why am I so generous... Boredom I suppose... Here I'll play with you... Till your juvenile games bore me... Let's start with what you already know, so the board can see your failures in all their glory.I'm not dicussing children carrying guns; and you know it. Stay on course, or be ignored for the remainder of this thread. I don't fall for leftist attempts to change the topic. Nor do I tolerate it...I did read the post... I'm talking about gun free school zones and I mentioned how they were innocent citizens... so to your comment, please tell me how many kids are packing heat at schools.
I AM talking about children as innocent citizens... because I AM discussing gun free school zones. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Jesus Christ are you that dense? You think the point of gun free school zones is to protect grandpa and grandma who live at the nursing home?
Children are "gun free" as individuals. (by law) So "no";gun free zones do not protect children; or innocents as you like to refer to them as; from other children carrying guns into the zone...
That leaves adults in the equation. They too for the most part are innocents. Even the gun carriers. So you earlier stated desire to separate guns from the innocent shows itself. Those most likely to be "protected" in manner you suggest; are the law abiding gun carriers themselves.
Just one more inch, in the miles, the gun grabbers desire to save the innocent from themselves...
No.
A person who knowingly carries a gun into a gun free zone is not innocent. Do you not understand that?
The goal post is back there <<~~~~~~.
You can leave your gun at home when you visit little Jim Bobs teacher
.
Last edited: