So Polygamists must also be protected by this new SCOTUS ruling, right?

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It's worth reading this whole article for anyone who really want to learn something and not just blather and bloviate for the purpose of fear mongering....

Polygamy Is Not the Next 'Gay Marriage'

Polygamy Is Not the Next Gay Marriage James Peron


The Christian Post -- not exactly a site for intellectuals -- has just such an article: "Why Two? The Question Gay Activists Can Not Answer." The author, Michael Brown, wrote a book on how Christians will reverse the course of the "gay revolution." No doubt he believes the Second Coming is just around the corner as well. Good luck waiting for either.


We have a massive number of laws -- federal and state -- that take marital status into account for various reasons. ALL those laws are written on the assumption of two members to a marriage.

It makes no difference to those thousands of laws whether the two spouses are of the same gender or different genders, nor does it matter whether they are of the same race, different races, of the same religion or different religions, same political beliefs or different beliefs. In other words, as long as there are two individuals it makes no difference to these thousands of laws. You can simply slot them in and it works.

The moment you change it to three, the entire legal structure ceases to work for that relationship. Instead of limiting legal disputes, it exacerbates them.

 

[Syriusly]

It's worth reading this whole article for anyone who really want to learn something and not just blather and bloviate for the purpose of fear mongering....

Polygamy Is Not the Next 'Gay Marriage'

Polygamy Is Not the Next Gay Marriage James Peron


The Christian Post -- not exactly a site for intellectuals -- has just such an article: "Why Two? The Question Gay Activists Can Not Answer." The author, Michael Brown, wrote a book on how Christians will reverse the course of the "gay revolution." No doubt he believes the Second Coming is just around the corner as well. Good luck waiting for either.


We have a massive number of laws -- federal and state -- that take marital status into account for various reasons. ALL those laws are written on the assumption of two members to a marriage.

It makes no difference to those thousands of laws whether the two spouses are of the same gender or different genders, nor does it matter whether they are of the same race, different races, of the same religion or different religions, same political beliefs or different beliefs. In other words, as long as there are two individuals it makes no difference to these thousands of laws. You can simply slot them in and it works.

The moment you change it to three, the entire legal structure ceases to work for that relationship. Instead of limiting legal disputes, it exacerbates them.

You know that won't happen.