Againsheila
Gold Member
- Nov 1, 2008
- 17,201
- 3,817
Ah, againsheila again standing up for people who make pisspoor decisions that hurt (and in this case, kill) other people, and demanding that the people be responsible for taking care of them.
He isn't in trouble for punching. He's in trouble for KILLING.
Geez, why are Republican/conservatives so full of anger? We don't know if the punch was the direct cause of the ref's death. Yes, the kid punched him, and he died, but many people get punched, more than once even, and don't die, so until we find out what caused his death, you can't be saying that he killed the ref.
And nobody is saying that the kid should get away with hitting the ref, but you all are already convicting him of "murder" and the results of the autopsy haven't even been released.
Hey, kc, you still think that everyone that comes to you for help in your job is lying?
You are the last person in the world that should be a social worker.
So you think the kid intended to kill the ref? I mean, if that was his intention, shouldn't he have gotten a gun instead of using his fist? You said he's not in trouble for punching the ref so, exactly what is he in trouble for? Do you think if he punched the ref and the ref didn't die that there should be no punishment?
Nevermind, if people didn't quote you I wouldn't have to look at your stupid posts.