JusticeHammer
Platinum Member
- Apr 20, 2017
- 7,091
- 4,279
What a waste of time.
Yes, Bernie is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What a waste of time.
i love this guy!
Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
i love this guy!
Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.Of course you do. Anything that disrupts a discussion you cream your jeans, doncha.
Does it not even occur to you that the statement in your title doesn't even appear in the video? Or are you just too stupid to check it?
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.Not much of a disruption. Looks like handled well, he said his piece and life went on. Not like the far right shouting Don jr. and the FOX chick off stage in California, which wasn't handled well. Either way, I don't think Bernie will be in the November election.
What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Where are those people?
I don't see right leaning people doing that.
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
"socialism eventually fails"
sigh.....
the happiest countries in the world are SOCIAL democracies;
Norway, Finland, Denmark,
In fact....here are the top 20 (note the US position)
1Finland 7.769 1.340 1.587 0.986 0.596 0.153 0.393
2Denmark 7.600 1.383 1.573 0.996 0.592 0.252 0.410
3Norway 7.554 1.488 1.582 1.028 0.603 0.271 0.341
4Iceland 7.494 1.380 1.624 1.026 0.591 0.354 0.118
5Netherlands 7.488 1.396 1.522 0.999 0.557 0.322 0.298
6Switzerland 7.480 1.452 1.526 1.052 0.572 0.263 0.343
7Sweden 7.343 1.387 1.487 1.009 0.574 0.267 0.373
8New Zealand 7.307 1.303 1.557 1.026 0.585 0.330 0.380
9Canada 7.278 1.365 1.505 1.039 0.584 0.285 0.308
10Austria 7.246 1.376 1.475 1.016 0.532 0.244 0.226
11Australia 7.228 1.372 1.548 1.036 0.557 0.332 0.290
12Costa Rica 7.167 1.034 1.441 0.963 0.558 0.144 0.093
13Israel 7.139 1.276 1.455 1.029 0.371 0.261 0.082
14Luxembourg 7.090 1.609 1.479 1.012 0.526 0.194 0.316
15United Kingdom 7.054 1.333 1.538 0.996 0.450 0.348 0.278
16Ireland 7.021 1.499 1.553 0.999 0.516 0.298 0.310
17Germany 6.985 1.373 1.454 0.987 0.495 0.261 0.265
18Belgium 6.923 1.356 1.504 0.986 0.473 0.160 0.210
19United States 6.892 1.433 1.457 0.874 0.454 0.280 0.128
20Czech Republic
YOU keep FORCING US to discuss Venezuala and Cuba....
but we don't want to be like those countries....
we don't want COMMUNIST socialism
We want everything we have NOW that YOU DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT (police, military, fire dept , roads, social security)
plus we'd like AFFORDABLE (not FREE not FREE not FREE NOT FKN FREE) AFFORDABLE Healthcare and Education.
like Norway
and Finland
NOT like Venezuela
Why can't you understand that?
what the fuk is wrong with you that you can't talk about Norway or Finland but MUST ONLY DISCUSS the evils of Venezuela?
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.What happens in November is moot. The point here was that the OP likes disruption of discourse. It's all he does in this joint.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Where are those people?
I don't see right leaning people doing that.
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
"socialism eventually fails"
sigh.....
the happiest countries in the world are SOCIAL democracies;
Norway, Finland, Denmark,
In fact....here are the top 20 (note the US position)
1Finland 7.769 1.340 1.587 0.986 0.596 0.153 0.393
2Denmark 7.600 1.383 1.573 0.996 0.592 0.252 0.410
3Norway 7.554 1.488 1.582 1.028 0.603 0.271 0.341
4Iceland 7.494 1.380 1.624 1.026 0.591 0.354 0.118
5Netherlands 7.488 1.396 1.522 0.999 0.557 0.322 0.298
6Switzerland 7.480 1.452 1.526 1.052 0.572 0.263 0.343
7Sweden 7.343 1.387 1.487 1.009 0.574 0.267 0.373
8New Zealand 7.307 1.303 1.557 1.026 0.585 0.330 0.380
9Canada 7.278 1.365 1.505 1.039 0.584 0.285 0.308
10Austria 7.246 1.376 1.475 1.016 0.532 0.244 0.226
11Australia 7.228 1.372 1.548 1.036 0.557 0.332 0.290
12Costa Rica 7.167 1.034 1.441 0.963 0.558 0.144 0.093
13Israel 7.139 1.276 1.455 1.029 0.371 0.261 0.082
14Luxembourg 7.090 1.609 1.479 1.012 0.526 0.194 0.316
15United Kingdom 7.054 1.333 1.538 0.996 0.450 0.348 0.278
16Ireland 7.021 1.499 1.553 0.999 0.516 0.298 0.310
17Germany 6.985 1.373 1.454 0.987 0.495 0.261 0.265
18Belgium 6.923 1.356 1.504 0.986 0.473 0.160 0.210
19United States 6.892 1.433 1.457 0.874 0.454 0.280 0.128
20Czech Republic
YOU keep FORCING US to discuss Venezuala and Cuba....
but we don't want to be like those countries....
we don't want COMMUNIST socialism
We want everything we have NOW that YOU DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT (police, military, fire dept , roads, social security)
plus we'd like AFFORDABLE (not FREE not FREE not FREE NOT FKN FREE) AFFORDABLE Healthcare and Education.
like Norway
and Finland
NOT like Venezuela
Why can't you understand that?
what the fuk is wrong with you that you can't talk about Norway or Finland but MUST ONLY DISCUSS the evils of Venezuela?
Countries with dictators always fail.
If Bernie really wants us to be more like the Scandinavian countries then we might end up with stronger capitalism. They have much less cronyism.
Yes and ours is very distorted. The Scandinavians seem to have much less corruption, and that is what we really need.If Bernie really wants us to be more like the Scandinavian countries then we might end up with stronger capitalism. They have much less cronyism.
I like capitalism.
Capitalism can be a real good idea!
but ANY "ism" can be taken to any extreme.....
Check your own hypocrisy.I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.
"I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd.
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Where are those people?
I don't see right leaning people doing that.
The Radical right shouted and harassed Don jr and that washed of FOX chick right off the stage in California (maybe Berkley?) about a month ago. There is Too much of "shout the SOB down" on both sides. When the right wing does it, it doesn't make FOX news most of the time. If right wing sources are all you see and listen to, you've probably missed.
Check your own hypocrisy."I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Where are those people?
I don't see right leaning people doing that.
The Radical right shouted and harassed Don jr and that washed of FOX chick right off the stage in California (maybe Berkley?) about a month ago. There is Too much of "shout the SOB down" on both sides. When the right wing does it, it doesn't make FOX news most of the time. If right wing sources are all you see and listen to, you've probably missed.
I've never watched Fox News.
So there is a nut case named Nick Fuentes, and his group is targeting conservatives.
Antifa, and the left-wing radicals are targeting conservatives.
When I say I don't see right-leaning people do that, I mean as a group.
Yes, there are individual nut cases that engage in disruption. Sure.
But from what I've read about this Nick Fuentes, is that he is just insane. If half of what I've read that he has said, is accurate, then he's a just a flat out nut job.
I don't see his views reflected in Conservatism anywhere... which is why some of his posts are all about how conservatives are fake. Because conservatives don't believe 90% of what he's said.
When I say I don't see right-wing people doing this, I mean from a mainstream point of view.
I see mainstream people who have openly supported the actions of Antifa to engage in violence, the opposite of this Nick Fuentes who is a fringe and marginalized right-wing person.
I don't see Ann Coulter supporting Nick Fuentes. I don't see Tucker Carlson supporting Nick either.
I do see professors at universities, openly support violence.
Prof wanted to fight Ben Shapiro; students want him promoted
The left-wing in this country, is openly directly supporting censorship of conservative views. Openly supporting violence.
Even in Charlottesville.... no matter how you cut it... there have been numerous protests pushing to remove confederate statues, and you don't see mass right-wing protests attacking them.
But when the right-wing has a protest to protect their history, the left-wing comes and does not just have a counter protest, but is violently attacking them.
And even when some far-right nutters respond to this instigation, by running people over... did you see right-wing conservatives supporting this? Did you see them with posts saying this was good, the way you see left-wingers promoting "punch a fascist"
View attachment 294990
What kind of pro-violence, anti-debate rhetoric is being promoted, by which side?
Left-wing. You don't see this being promoted by conservative professors, or by conservative churches anywhere.
Check your own hypocrisy."I'll bet you don't take that stance if a Republican is on stage and being interrupted by the crowd"
if hypocrisy is a bad thing then perhaps you should check your own.
when a conservative interrupts a democrat conservatives think it's funny and constitutional.
when a lib interrupts a republican those same cons want to beat the shit out him.
and then....YOU.....get to hypocritically call liberals "hypocrites!"
you get to denounce THEM for the same crime you applaud in your own kind!
which is JUST WHAT YOU DID!
I have always been of the mindset that a candidate on the stump is trying to convey his or her beliefs and values so that the people can make a choice. You sit and listen, you do NOT debate their beliefs. You accept them or reject them.
A politician in a town hall meeting is a different animal. The Politician is there to listen to the people and when the politician tries to quibble or spin his or her position, the audience has every right to confront, challenge and even shout down the politician.
It all comes down to setting and purpose. So take your hypocrisy and shove it up your ass.
Far too many left leaning people think they have a right to silence anyone who is speaking they disagree with, in any situation.
Agreed. Far too many right leaning people also.
Where are those people?
I don't see right leaning people doing that.
The Radical right shouted and harassed Don jr and that washed of FOX chick right off the stage in California (maybe Berkley?) about a month ago. There is Too much of "shout the SOB down" on both sides. When the right wing does it, it doesn't make FOX news most of the time. If right wing sources are all you see and listen to, you've probably missed.
I've never watched Fox News.
So there is a nut case named Nick Fuentes, and his group is targeting conservatives.
Antifa, and the left-wing radicals are targeting conservatives.
When I say I don't see right-leaning people do that, I mean as a group.
Yes, there are individual nut cases that engage in disruption. Sure.
But from what I've read about this Nick Fuentes, is that he is just insane. If half of what I've read that he has said, is accurate, then he's a just a flat out nut job.
I don't see his views reflected in Conservatism anywhere... which is why some of his posts are all about how conservatives are fake. Because conservatives don't believe 90% of what he's said.
When I say I don't see right-wing people doing this, I mean from a mainstream point of view.
I see mainstream people who have openly supported the actions of Antifa to engage in violence, the opposite of this Nick Fuentes who is a fringe and marginalized right-wing person.
I don't see Ann Coulter supporting Nick Fuentes. I don't see Tucker Carlson supporting Nick either.
I do see professors at universities, openly support violence.
Prof wanted to fight Ben Shapiro; students want him promoted
The left-wing in this country, is openly directly supporting censorship of conservative views. Openly supporting violence.
Even in Charlottesville.... no matter how you cut it... there have been numerous protests pushing to remove confederate statues, and you don't see mass right-wing protests attacking them.
But when the right-wing has a protest to protect their history, the left-wing comes and does not just have a counter protest, but is violently attacking them.
And even when some far-right nutters respond to this instigation, by running people over... did you see right-wing conservatives supporting this? Did you see them with posts saying this was good, the way you see left-wingers promoting "punch a fascist"
View attachment 294990
What kind of pro-violence, anti-debate rhetoric is being promoted, by which side?
Left-wing. You don't see this being promoted by conservative professors, or by conservative churches anywhere.
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
"socialism eventually fails"
sigh.....
the happiest countries in the world are SOCIAL democracies;
Norway, Finland, Denmark,
In fact....here are the top 20 (note the US position)
1Finland 7.769 1.340 1.587 0.986 0.596 0.153 0.393
2Denmark 7.600 1.383 1.573 0.996 0.592 0.252 0.410
3Norway 7.554 1.488 1.582 1.028 0.603 0.271 0.341
4Iceland 7.494 1.380 1.624 1.026 0.591 0.354 0.118
5Netherlands 7.488 1.396 1.522 0.999 0.557 0.322 0.298
6Switzerland 7.480 1.452 1.526 1.052 0.572 0.263 0.343
7Sweden 7.343 1.387 1.487 1.009 0.574 0.267 0.373
8New Zealand 7.307 1.303 1.557 1.026 0.585 0.330 0.380
9Canada 7.278 1.365 1.505 1.039 0.584 0.285 0.308
10Austria 7.246 1.376 1.475 1.016 0.532 0.244 0.226
11Australia 7.228 1.372 1.548 1.036 0.557 0.332 0.290
12Costa Rica 7.167 1.034 1.441 0.963 0.558 0.144 0.093
13Israel 7.139 1.276 1.455 1.029 0.371 0.261 0.082
14Luxembourg 7.090 1.609 1.479 1.012 0.526 0.194 0.316
15United Kingdom 7.054 1.333 1.538 0.996 0.450 0.348 0.278
16Ireland 7.021 1.499 1.553 0.999 0.516 0.298 0.310
17Germany 6.985 1.373 1.454 0.987 0.495 0.261 0.265
18Belgium 6.923 1.356 1.504 0.986 0.473 0.160 0.210
19United States 6.892 1.433 1.457 0.874 0.454 0.280 0.128
20Czech Republic
YOU keep FORCING US to discuss Venezuala and Cuba....
but we don't want to be like those countries....
we don't want COMMUNIST socialism
We want everything we have NOW that YOU DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT (police, military, fire dept , roads, social security)
plus we'd like AFFORDABLE (not FREE not FREE not FREE NOT FKN FREE) AFFORDABLE Healthcare and Education.
like Norway
and Finland
NOT like Venezuela
Why can't you understand that?
what the fuk is wrong with you that you can't talk about Norway or Finland but MUST ONLY DISCUSS the evils of Venezuela?
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
"socialism eventually fails"
sigh.....
the happiest countries in the world are SOCIAL democracies;
Norway, Finland, Denmark,
In fact....here are the top 20 (note the US position)
1Finland 7.769 1.340 1.587 0.986 0.596 0.153 0.393
2Denmark 7.600 1.383 1.573 0.996 0.592 0.252 0.410
3Norway 7.554 1.488 1.582 1.028 0.603 0.271 0.341
4Iceland 7.494 1.380 1.624 1.026 0.591 0.354 0.118
5Netherlands 7.488 1.396 1.522 0.999 0.557 0.322 0.298
6Switzerland 7.480 1.452 1.526 1.052 0.572 0.263 0.343
7Sweden 7.343 1.387 1.487 1.009 0.574 0.267 0.373
8New Zealand 7.307 1.303 1.557 1.026 0.585 0.330 0.380
9Canada 7.278 1.365 1.505 1.039 0.584 0.285 0.308
10Austria 7.246 1.376 1.475 1.016 0.532 0.244 0.226
11Australia 7.228 1.372 1.548 1.036 0.557 0.332 0.290
12Costa Rica 7.167 1.034 1.441 0.963 0.558 0.144 0.093
13Israel 7.139 1.276 1.455 1.029 0.371 0.261 0.082
14Luxembourg 7.090 1.609 1.479 1.012 0.526 0.194 0.316
15United Kingdom 7.054 1.333 1.538 0.996 0.450 0.348 0.278
16Ireland 7.021 1.499 1.553 0.999 0.516 0.298 0.310
17Germany 6.985 1.373 1.454 0.987 0.495 0.261 0.265
18Belgium 6.923 1.356 1.504 0.986 0.473 0.160 0.210
19United States 6.892 1.433 1.457 0.874 0.454 0.280 0.128
20Czech Republic
YOU keep FORCING US to discuss Venezuala and Cuba....
but we don't want to be like those countries....
we don't want COMMUNIST socialism
We want everything we have NOW that YOU DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT (police, military, fire dept , roads, social security)
plus we'd like AFFORDABLE (not FREE not FREE not FREE NOT FKN FREE) AFFORDABLE Healthcare and Education.
like Norway
and Finland
NOT like Venezuela
Why can't you understand that?
what the fuk is wrong with you that you can't talk about Norway or Finland but MUST ONLY DISCUSS the evils of Venezuela?
Why do you keep claiming that those countries are socialist, when even those country deny they are socialist?
So...I'm sure he will nobly turn down Social Security and Medicare since they are socialism.
I've never understood this comment from left-wingers.
If you give me money to live on.... why would I not take it? Sure you paying for my life, will eventually cause you to go bankrupt, but until that happens, I'll take every dollar you give me. That's your fault for offering to pay for my life. Has nothing to do with me. I'm simply accepting the money you are willing to give out.
Again, Venezuela... they did all this, and the result was the country imploded, and people are eating their pet dog and cat to survive a little longer.
Millions of people already left the country almost a decade ago. Them leaving... and not taking the socialist hand outs, didn't change the fact that socialism eventually fails. So whether we take every dollar from Social Security and Medicare until they go broke, or we don't... doesn't change that both will go broke. So there is no reason we shouldn't take whatever we can get, until the system fails.
It's going to fail no matter what we do, because socials has always failed, is failing, and will fail in the future.
I'll take every dollar you are willing to give me, until you are impoverished like those in France.
"socialism eventually fails"
sigh.....
the happiest countries in the world are SOCIAL democracies;
Norway, Finland, Denmark,
In fact....here are the top 20 (note the US position)
1Finland 7.769 1.340 1.587 0.986 0.596 0.153 0.393
2Denmark 7.600 1.383 1.573 0.996 0.592 0.252 0.410
3Norway 7.554 1.488 1.582 1.028 0.603 0.271 0.341
4Iceland 7.494 1.380 1.624 1.026 0.591 0.354 0.118
5Netherlands 7.488 1.396 1.522 0.999 0.557 0.322 0.298
6Switzerland 7.480 1.452 1.526 1.052 0.572 0.263 0.343
7Sweden 7.343 1.387 1.487 1.009 0.574 0.267 0.373
8New Zealand 7.307 1.303 1.557 1.026 0.585 0.330 0.380
9Canada 7.278 1.365 1.505 1.039 0.584 0.285 0.308
10Austria 7.246 1.376 1.475 1.016 0.532 0.244 0.226
11Australia 7.228 1.372 1.548 1.036 0.557 0.332 0.290
12Costa Rica 7.167 1.034 1.441 0.963 0.558 0.144 0.093
13Israel 7.139 1.276 1.455 1.029 0.371 0.261 0.082
14Luxembourg 7.090 1.609 1.479 1.012 0.526 0.194 0.316
15United Kingdom 7.054 1.333 1.538 0.996 0.450 0.348 0.278
16Ireland 7.021 1.499 1.553 0.999 0.516 0.298 0.310
17Germany 6.985 1.373 1.454 0.987 0.495 0.261 0.265
18Belgium 6.923 1.356 1.504 0.986 0.473 0.160 0.210
19United States 6.892 1.433 1.457 0.874 0.454 0.280 0.128
20Czech Republic
YOU keep FORCING US to discuss Venezuala and Cuba....
but we don't want to be like those countries....
we don't want COMMUNIST socialism
We want everything we have NOW that YOU DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT (police, military, fire dept , roads, social security)
plus we'd like AFFORDABLE (not FREE not FREE not FREE NOT FKN FREE) AFFORDABLE Healthcare and Education.
like Norway
and Finland
NOT like Venezuela
Why can't you understand that?
what the fuk is wrong with you that you can't talk about Norway or Finland but MUST ONLY DISCUSS the evils of Venezuela?
Why do you keep claiming that those countries are socialist, when even those country deny they are socialist?
Why do your fellow travellers and the OP keep claiming that Bernie Sanders is a "socialist" when he self-describes as a Democratic Socialist?
See how that works?
Having it both ways: Priceless.